Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
7.
Rev. colomb. reumatol ; 23(1): 44-46, enero-marzo.2016. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-836083

RESUMO

(AU) Describimos el caso de un varón joven, con un fracaso renal agudo anúrico severo e hiperpotasemia tóxica, relacionados con una rabdomiólisis tras una agresión física y que había pasado desapercibida en 2 visitas previas a Urgencias y, posteriormente, agravada por consumo de anfetaminas. Este caso ilustra la necesidad de considerar la posibilidad de una rabdomiólisis ante paciente con cualquier grado de daño muscular


Assuntos
Humanos , Hiperpotassemia , Rabdomiólise
8.
Nefrologia ; 32(1): 108-13, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22294009

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Proper hydration is one of the major aims in haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Bioimpedance spectroscopy appears to be a promising method for the evaluation and follow up of the hydration status in dialysis patients (P). OBJECTIVES: We compared body composition between stable patients on HD and PD after six months. PATIENTS AND METHOD: An observational study with 62 P on HD and 19 P on PD was performed. Clinical, biochemical and bioimpedance parameters were analysed. RESULTS: In the comparative study, PD P were younger (50 ± 10 vs 57 ± 14 years, P=.031). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.8 ± 3 vs 7.5 ± 3, P<.001), time on dialysis (16.9 ± 18.01 vs 51.88 ± 68.79 months, P=.020) and C-Reactive Protein [3 (3-9.3) vs 5.25 (1-76.4)] were lower. Total protein levels (7.46 ± 0.44 vs 7.04 ± 0.55 g/dl, P=.005) and transferrin levels (205 ± 41 vs 185 ± 29 mg/dl, P=.024) were higher. BIS: Intracellular water (19.67 ± 3.61 vs 16.51 ± 3.36 litres, P=.010), lean tissue mass (LTM) (37.20 ± 8.65 vs 32.57 ± 8.72 kg, P=.029), total cellular mass (TCM) (20.53 ± 5.65 vs 17.56 ± 5.91 kg, P=.033), and bioelectrical impedance phase angle (Phi 50) (5.81 ± 0.86 vs 4.74 ± 0.98, P=.000) were higher than in HD P. Overhydration: 22% in HD y 10% in PD, in conditions referred to in methods. Six months later, PD P increased in weight (73.75 ± 12.27 vs 75.22 ± 11.87 kg, P=.027), total fat (FAT) (26.88 ± 10 vs 30.02 ± 10 kg, P=.011) and relative fat (Rel FAT) (35.75 ± 9.87 vs 39.34 ± 9.12, P=.010); and decreased in ICW (18.56 ± 3.45 vs 17.65 ± 3.69 l, P=.009), LTM (36.95 ± 8.88 vs 34 ± 9.70 kg, P=.008) and relative LTM (Rel LTM) (50.85 ± 12.33 vs 45.40 ± 11.95%, P=.012). In the multivariate analysis, weight variation (∆) was related to ∆ FAT (P < .001). We found a correlation between fat increase and lean tissue mass decrease. Six months later, in HD P, we observed a reduction in ECW (15.11 ± 2.45 vs 14.00 ± 2.45, P.001), without changes in other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Bioelectrical impedance analysis facilitates the assessment of changes in body composition so as to correct dry weight and to introduce changes in treatment schedule..


Assuntos
Composição Corporal , Diálise Renal , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal , Fatores de Tempo
9.
Nefrología (Madr.) ; 32(1): 108-113, ene.-feb. 2012. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-103313

RESUMO

Introducción: La normohidratación es uno de los mayores objetivos en hemodiálisis (HD) y diálisis peritoneal (DP). La bioimpedancia por espectroscopia (BIS) se postula como el método más prometedor para la evaluación y seguimiento del estado de hidratación en pacientes en diálisis. Objetivo: Comparar la composición corporal de pacientes prevalentes en HD y DP en un intervalo de seis meses. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional de 62 pacientes en HD y 19 en DP comparando los parámetros clínicos, bioquímicos y de bioimpedancia. Resultados: En el estudio comparativo, los pacientes en DP fueron más jóvenes (50 ± 10 vs. 57 ± 14 años, p = 0,031). El índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (4,8 ± 3 vs. 7,5 ± 3, p < 0,001), tiempo en diálisis (16,9 ± 18,01 vs. 51,88 ± 68,79 meses, p = 0,020) y proteína C reactiva [3 (3-9,3) vs. 5,25 (1-76,4)] fueron menores. Los niveles de proteínas totales (7,46 ± 0,44 vs. 7,04 ± 0,55 g/dl, p = 0,005), y transferrina (205 ± 41 vs. 185 ± 29 mg/dl, p = 0,024) fueron más elevados. BIS: agua intracelular (AIC) (19,67 ± 3,61 vs. 16,51 ± 3,36 litros, p = 0,010), masa muscular total (MM) (37,20 ± 8,65 vs. 32,57 ± 8,72 kg, p = 0,029), masa celular total (MCT) (20,53 ± 5,65 vs. 17,56 ± 5,91 kg, p = 0,033) y ángulo de fase (Phi 50) (5,81 ± 0,86 vs. 4,74 ± 0,98, p = 0,000) fueron más elevados que en HD. Sobrehidratados 22% en HD y 10% en DP, en las condiciones referidas en métodos. A los seis meses en DP observamos aumento de peso (73,75 ± 12,27 vs. 75,22 ± 11,87 kg, p = 0,027), grasa total (MG) (26,88 ± 10 vs. 30,02 ± 10 kg, p = 0,011) y relativa (MG %) (35,75 ± 9,87 vs. 39,34 ± 9,12, p = 0,010); disminución de AIC (18,56 ± 3,45 vs. 17,65 ± 3,69 l, p = 0,009), MM (36,95 ± 8,88 vs. 34 ± 9,70 kg, p = 0,008) y MM relativa (MM %) (50,85 ± 12,33 vs. 45,40 ± 11,95%, p = 0,012). En el análisis multivariante, la variación (DELTA) de peso guarda relación con el DELTA de grasa (p < 0,001). Encontramos correlación entre el incremento de grasa y el decremento de masa muscular (p = 0,01). A los seis meses en HD no se observaron cambios en estos parámetros, salvo una reducción en el agua extracelular (15,11± 2,45 vs. 14,00 ± 2,45, p = 0,001). Conclusiones: BIS permite valorar los cambios en la composición corporal y ayuda a establecer el peso seco e introducir cambios en las pautas de tratamiento (AU)


Introduction: Proper hydration is one of the major aims in haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Bioimpedance spectroscopy appears to be a promising method for the evaluation and follow up of the hydration status in dialysis patients (P). Objectives: We compared body composition between stable patients on HD and PD after six months. Patients and method: An observational study with 62 P on HD and 19 P on PD was performed. Clinical, biochemical and bioimpedance parameters were analysed. Results: In the comparative study, PD P were younger (50±10 vs 57±14 years, P=.031). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (4.8±3 vs 7.5±3, P<.001), time on dialysis (16.9±18.01 vs 51.88±68.79 months, P=.020) and C-Reactive Protein [3 (3-9.3) vs 5.25 (1-76.4)] were lower. Total protein levels (7.46±0.44 vs 7.04±0.55 g/dl, P=.005) and transferrin levels (205±41 vs 185±29 mg/dl, P=.024) were higher. BIS: Intracellular water (19.67±3.61 vs 16.51±3.36 litres, P=.010), lean tissue mass (LTM) (37.20±8.65 vs 32.57±8.72 kg, P=.029), total cellular mass (TCM) (20.53±5.65 vs 17.56±5.91 kg, P=.033), and bioelectrical impedance phase angle (Phi 50) (5.81±0.86 vs 4.74±0.98, P=.000) were higher than in HD P. Overhydration: 22% in HD y 10% in PD, in conditions referred to in methods. Six months later, PD P increased in weight (73.75±12.27 vs 75.22±11.87 kg, P=.027), total fat (FAT) (26.88±10 vs 30.02±10 kg, P=.011) and relative fat (Rel FAT) (35.75±9.87 vs 39.34±9.12, P=.010); and decreased in ICW (18.56±3.45 vs 17.65±3.69 l, P=.009), LTM (36.95±8.88 vs 34±9.70 kg, P=.008) and relative LTM (Rel LTM) (50.85±12.33 vs 45.40±11.95%, P=.012). In the multivariate analysis, weight variation (DELTA) was related to DELTA FAT (P<.001). We found a correlation between fat increase and lean tissue mass decrease. Six months later, in HD P, we observed a reduction in ECW (15.11±2.45 vs 14.00±2.45, P.001), without changes in other parameters. Conclusions: Bioelectrical impedance analysis facilitates the assessment of changes in body composition so as to correct dry weight and to introduce changes in treatment schedule (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Peritoneal/estatística & dados numéricos , Composição Corporal , Fatores de Risco , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/epidemiologia , Impedância Elétrica
10.
Nephron Extra ; 1(1): 283-91, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22470402

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) have been associated with increased mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We hypothesize that elevated ALP could be partly explained by subclinical liver congestion related to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: Doppler echocardiography was performed in 68 patients with advanced CKD followed up for a median of 2.1 years. Time-averaged levels of ALP and γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) were compared between patients with and without diastolic dysfunction. We also evaluated the effect of intensifying diuretic treatment on ALP levels in a small group of 16 patients with high ALP and signs of volume overload. RESULTS: ALP correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with GGT but not with parathyroid hormone (p = 0.09). Patients with diastolic dysfunction showed higher ALP (p = 0.01), higher GGT (p = 0.03) and lower albumin (p = 0.04). The highest values of ALP were observed in patients with diastolic dysfunction plus pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.01). Intensifying diuretic therapy in a subgroup of patients with signs of fluid overload induced a significant reduction in body weight, GGT (p < 0.001) and ALP levels (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated ALP in patients with advanced CKD could be partly explained by subclinical liver congestion related to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, hypervolemia or both. The worse prognosis of these patients could be explained by their myocardial damage.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA