Budesonide enema in pouchitis--a double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis has been suggested to be a recurrence of ulcerative colitis in a colon-like mucosa. Topical steroids are a valid therapeutic alternative for distal forms of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide enema in the treatment of pouchitis compared with oral metronidazole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with an active episode of pouchitis (defined as a pouchitis disease activity index score >or= 7) and no treatment during the previous month were randomized to receive either budesonide enema (2 mg/100 mL at bedtime) plus placebo tablets or oral metronidazole (0.5 g b.d.) plus placebo enema in a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, 6-week, controlled trial. RESULTS: Based on the intention-to-treat principle, we detected a significant improvement in disease activity at the end of the first week with both drugs (P < 0.01). After that, improvement was moderated until stabilization at 4 weeks in both treatments. The per protocol analysis showed that both drugs had similar efficacy in terms of disease activity, clinical and endoscopic findings. Fifty-eight per cent and 50% of patients improved (decrease in pouchitis disease activity index >or= 3) with budesonide enema and metronidazole, respectively (odds ratio, 1.4; confidence interval, 0.2-8.9). Adverse effects were observed in 57% of patients given metronidazole and in 25% of patients given budesonide. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide enemas are an alternative treatment for active pouchitis, with similar efficacy but better tolerability than oral metronidazole.

Serum transforming growth factor-beta1 levels increase in response to successful anti-inflammatory therapy in ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate serum levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 and interferon-gamma in active ulcerative colitis and to assess changes during treatment. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated serum from 25 patients with untreated active ulcerative colitis and 19 healthy controls. Disease activity score (DAI), serum transforming growth factor-beta1 and interferon-gamma levels were measured at baseline and after 7 days of conventional treatment. Disease activity score and transforming growth factor-beta1 were also assessed at 42 days. RESULTS: Baseline transforming growth factor-beta1 levels were significantly higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.02). On the 7th day, transforming growth factor-beta1 levels increased only in patients who responded (P < 0. 01); variations in transforming growth factor-beta1 levels and disease activity score were inversely correlated (r=- 0.72, P < 0. 001). At day 42, serum transforming growth factor-beta1 decreased significantly compared with the 7th day (P < 0.05). While in controls, interferon-gamma was undetectable; untreated patients had higher, widely variable, levels. At day 7, responders had higher interferon-gamma values than unresponsive cases. Variations in interferon-gamma correlated moderately with changes in transforming growth factor-beta1 (r=0.53, P < 0.05). Cytokine response did not depend upon the type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both transforming growth factor-beta1 and interferon-gamma may play a role in the injury-repair process in active ulcerative colitis. Variations in circulating transforming growth factor-beta1 levels in the first week of treatment seem to be related to the therapeutic response.