Investigating the Relationship between Bleeding, Clotting, and Coagulopathy During Automated Partial REBOA Strategies in a Highly Lethal Porcine Hemorrhage Model.

BACKGROUND: Death due to hemorrhagic shock, particularly, non-compressible truncal hemorrhage (NCTH), remains one of the leading causes of potentially preventable deaths. Automated partial and intermittent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (i.e., pREBOA and iREBOA, respectively) are lifesaving endovascular strategies aimed to achieve quick hemostatic control while mitigating distal ischemia. In iREBOA, the balloon is titrated from full occlusion to no occlusion intermittently whereas in pREBOA, a partial occlusion is maintained. Therefore, these two interventions impose different hemodynamic conditions, which may impact coagulation and the endothelial glycocalyx layer (EGL). In this study, we aimed to characterize the clotting kinetics and coagulopathy associated with iREBOA and pREBOA, using thromboelastography (TEG). We hypothesized that iREBOA would be associated with a more hypercoagulopathic response compared to pREBOA due to more oscillatory flow. METHODS: Yorkshire swine (n = 8/group) were subjected to an uncontrolled hemorrhage by liver transection, followed by 90 minutes of automated partial REBOA (pREBOA), intermittent REBOA (iREBOA), or no balloon support (Control). Hemodynamic parameters were continuously recorded, and blood samples were serially collected during the experiment (i.e., 8 key time points: baseline (BL), T0, T10, T30, T60, T90, T120, T210 minutes). Citrated kaolin heparinase (CKH) assays were run on a TEG 5000 (Haemonetics, Niles, IL). General linear mixed models were employed to compare differences in TEG parameters between groups and over time using STATA (v17; College Station, TX), while adjusting for sex and weight. RESULTS: As expected, iREBOA was associated with more oscillations in proximal pressure (and greater magnitudes of peak pressure) because of the intermittent periods of full aortic occlusion and complete balloon deflation, compared to pREBOA. Despite these differences in acute hemodynamics, there were no significant differences in any of the TEG parameters between iREBOA and pREBOA groups. However, animals in both groups experienced a significant reduction in clotting times (R-time: p < 0.001; K-time: p < 0.001) and clot strength (MA: p = 0.01; G: p = 0.02) over the duration of the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite observing acute differences in peak proximal pressures between iREBOA and pREBOA groups, we did not observe any significant differences in TEG parameters between iREBOA and pREBOA. The changes in TEG profiles were significant over time, indicating that a severe hemorrhage followed by both pREBOA and iREBOA can result in faster clotting reaction times (i.e., R-times). Nevertheless, when considering the significant reduction in transfusion requirements and more stable hemodynamic response in the pREBOA group, there may be some evidence favoring pREBOA usage over iREBOA.

Delayed management of acute type A aortic dissection with concomitant coronary artery bypass graft.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative coronary angiography and concomitant, planned coronary artery bypass are infrequently performed with type A aortic dissection repair. We present a case in which pre-operative coronary computed tomography angiography was appropriate, and subsequent dissection repair and concomitant coronary artery bypass were successfully performed. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is a 58-year-old male with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, renal insufficiency, hypertension, obesity, and smoking history, who presented with a three-to-four-day history of persistent back pain, worsening exertional dyspnea, and orthopnea, as well as a two-to-three month history of dyspnea, lower extremity edema, and intermittent angina. He was diagnosed with an acute type A aortic dissection and anti-impulse control was initiated. However, repair was delayed in order to allow apixaban to metabolize and decrease the risk of bleeding, as the patient was approximately six days post-dissection, without malperfusion, with a well-controlled blood pressure on anti-impulse therapy, and had received five days of anticoagulation. During this time, coronary computed tomography angiography was performed to assess the need for concomitant revascularization and showed coronary artery disease. Ascending aorta hemiarch replacement with aortic valve resuspension, two-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting, and left atrial appendage clipping were performed successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative imaging can be considered in a select group of acute type A aortic dissections that present without malperfusion, and with well-controlled blood pressure on anti-impulse/negative inotropic therapy.

A Comparative Analysis of "Surgery First" vs. "Endoscopy First" for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis Presenting at the End of the Week.

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis in children is commonly managed with an "endoscopy first" (EF) strategy (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under a separate anesthetic). Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography is limited at the end of the week (EoW). We hypothesize that a "surgery first" (SF) approach with LC, intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), and possible laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) can decrease length of stay (LOS) and time to definitive intervention (TTDI). METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2023 in pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Work week (WW) presentation included admission between Monday and Thursday. Time to definitive intervention was defined as time to LC. RESULTS: 88 pediatric patients were identified, 61 managed with SF (33 WW and 28 EoW) and 27 managed with EF (18 WW and 9 EoW). Both SF groups had shorter mean LOS for WW and EoW presentation (64.5 h, 92.4 h, 112.9 h, and 113.0 h; P < .05). There was a downtreading TTDI in the SF groups (SF: WW 24.7 h and EoW 21.7 h; EF: WW 31.7 h and EoW 35.9 h; P = .11). 44 patients underwent LCBDE with similar success rates (91.6% WW and 85% EoW; P = 1.0). All EF patients received 2 procedures; 69% of SF patients were definitively managed with one. CONCLUSION: Children with choledocholithiasis at the EoW have a longer LOS and TTDI. These findings are amplified when children enter an EF treatment pathway. An SF approach results in shorter LOS with fewer procedures, regardless of the time of presentation.

MAN VERSUS MACHINE: PROVIDER DIRECTED VERSUS PRECISION AUTOMATED CRITICAL CARE MANAGEMENT IN A PORCINE MODEL OF DISTRIBUTIVE SHOCK.

ABSTRACT: Background: Critical care management of shock is a labor-intensive process. Precision Automated Critical Care Management (PACC-MAN) is an automated closed-loop system incorporating physiologic and hemodynamic inputs to deliver interventions while avoiding excessive fluid or vasopressor administration. To understand PACC-MAN efficacy, we compared PACC-MAN to provider-directed management (PDM). We hypothesized that PACC-MAN would achieve equivalent resuscitation outcomes to PDM while maintaining normotension with lower fluid and vasopressor requirements. Methods : Twelve swine underwent 30% controlled hemorrhage over 30 min, followed by 45 min of aortic occlusion to generate a vasoplegic shock state, transfusion to euvolemia, and randomization to PACC-MAN or PDM for 4.25 h. Primary outcomes were total crystalloid volume, vasopressor administration, total time spent at hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure <60 mm Hg), and total number of interventions. Results : Weight-based fluid volumes were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM; median and IQR are reported (73.1 mL/kg [59.0-78.7] vs. 87.1 mL/kg [79.4-91.8], P = 0.07). There was no statistical difference in cumulative norepinephrine (PACC-MAN: 33.4 µg/kg [27.1-44.6] vs. PDM: 7.5 [3.3-24.2] µg/kg, P = 0.09). The median percentage of time spent at hypotension was equivalent (PACC-MAN: 6.2% [3.6-7.4] and PDM: 3.1% [1.3-6.6], P = 0.23). Urine outputs were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM (14.0 mL/kg vs. 21.5 mL/kg, P = 0.13). Conclusion : Automated resuscitation achieves equivalent resuscitation outcomes to direct human intervention in this shock model. This study provides the first translational experience with the PACC-MAN system versus PDM.

Spare the Needle, Discharge the Child: Trending Post-Op Labs After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Pediatric Patients Is Not Helpful.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) utility in management of choledocholithiasis may decrease length of stay and patient cost, but postoperative management remains widely debated. We examined periprocedural LFTs for patients undergoing LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) speculating for trend existence after successful LCBDE. We hypothesized that postoperative LCBDE LFTs would not downtrend even after successful ductal clearance. We identified 99 patients under 18 who underwent ERCP or LCBDE with at least one pre- and post-procedural LFT. Periprocedural LFTs between groups were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The 22 ERCP patients demonstrated a significant downtrend across Tbili (P < .001), AST (P = .001), ALT (P = .002), and ALP (P < .001). The 27 LCBDE patients demonstrated a significant downtrend in Tbili (P = .002) only, while AST (P > .05), ALT (P > .05), and ALP (P > .05) were nonsignificant. Lack of consistent downtrend in the LCBDE group raises doubt regarding the utility of postoperative LFTs for post-procedural management.

Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Pediatric Patients with Choledocholithiasis: A Multi-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with choledocholithiasis are often treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Upfront LC, intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), and possible transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) could potentially avoid the need for ERCP. We hypothesized that upfront LC + IOC ± LCBDE will decrease length of stay (LOS) and the total number of interventions for children with suspected choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric patients (<18 years) between 2018 and 2022 with suspected choledocholithiasis. Demographic and clinical data were compared for upfront LC + IOC ± LCBDE and possible postoperative ERCP (OR1st) versus preoperative ERCP prior to LC (OR2nd). Complications were defined as postoperative pancreatitis, recurrent choledocholithiasis, bleeding, or abscess. RESULTS: Across four centers, 252 children with suspected choledocholithiasis were treated with OR1st (n = 156) or OR2nd (n = 96). There were no differences in age, gender, or body mass index. Of the LCBDE patients (72/156), 86% had definitive intraoperative management with the remaining 14% requiring postoperative ERCP. Complications were fewer and LOS was shorter with OR1st (3/156 vs. 15/96; 2.39 vs 3.84 days, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Upfront LC + IOC ± LCBDE for children with choledocholithiasis is associated with fewer ERCPs, lower LOS, and decreased complications. Postoperative ERCP remains an essential adjunct for patients who fail LCBDE. Further educational efforts are needed to increase the skill level for IOC and LCBDE in pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reclaiming the management of common duct stones in acute care surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) is well positioned to manage choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but barriers to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) include experience and the perceived need for specialized equipment. The technical complexity of this pathway is generally seen as challenging. As such, LCBDE is historically relegated to the "enthusiast." However, a simplified, effective LCBDE technique as part of a "surgery first" strategy could drive wider adoption in the specialty most often managing these patients. To determine efficacy and safety, we sought to compare our initial ACS-driven experience with a simple, fluoroscopy-guided, catheter-based LCBDE approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We reviewed ACS patients who underwent LCBDE or LC + ERCP (pre-/postoperative) at a tertiary care center in the 4 years since starting this surgery first approach. Demographics, outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) were compared on an intention to treat basis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via using wire/catheter Seldinger techniques under fluoroscopic guidance with flushing or balloon dilation of the sphincter as needed. Our primary outcomes were LOS and successful duct clearance. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were treated for choledocholithiasis with 71 undergoing LCBDE. The success rate of catheter-based LCBDE was 70.4%. Length of stay was significantly reduced for the LCBDE group compared with the LC + ERCP group (48.8 vs. 84.3 hours, p < 0.01). Of note, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in the LCBDE group. CONCLUSION: A simplified catheter-based approach to LCBDE is safe and associated with decreased LOS when compared with LC + ERCP. This simplified step-up approach may help facilitate wider LCBDE utilization by ACS providers who are well positioned for a timely surgery first approach in the management of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Automated partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta reduces blood loss and hypotension in a highly lethal porcine liver injury model.

BACKGROUND: Partial and intermittent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (pREBOA and iREBOA, respectively) are lifesaving techniques designed to extend therapeutic duration, mitigate ischemia, and bridge patients to definitive hemorrhage control. We hypothesized that automated pREBOA balloon titration compared with automated iREBOA would reduce blood loss and hypotensive episodes over a 90-minute intervention phase compared with iREBOA in an uncontrolled liver hemorrhage swine model. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs underwent an uncontrolled hemorrhage by liver transection and were randomized to automated pREBOA (n = 8), iREBOA (n = 8), or control (n = 8). Once hemorrhagic shock criteria were met, controls had the REBOA catheter removed and received transfusions only for hypotension. The REBOA groups received 90 minutes of either iREBOA or pREBOA therapy. Surgical hemostasis was obtained, hemorrhage volume was quantified, and animals were transfused to euvolemia and then underwent 1.5 hours of automated critical care. RESULTS: The control group had significantly higher mortality rate (5 of 8) compared with no deaths in both REBOA groups, demonstrating that the liver injury is highly lethal ( p = 0.03). During the intervention phase, animals in the iREBOA group spent a greater proportion of time in hypotension than the pREBOA group (20.7% [16.2-24.8%] vs. 0.76% [0.43-1.14%]; p < 0.001). The iREBOA group required significantly more transfusions than pREBOA (21.0 [20.0-24.9] mL/kg vs. 12.1 [9.5-13.9] mL/kg; p = 0.01). At surgical hemostasis, iREBOA had significantly higher hemorrhage volumes compared with pREBOA (39.2 [29.7-44.95] mL/kg vs. 24.7 [21.6-30.8] mL/kg; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Partial REBOA animals spent significantly less time at hypotension and had decreased transfusions and blood loss. Both pREBOA and iREBOA prevented immediate death compared with controls. Further refinement of automated pREBOA is necessary, and controller algorithms may serve as vital control inputs for automated transfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Simulation in Surgical Resident Education: A Porcine Hemostasis and Laparoscopic Model.

The steep learning curve associated with learning laparoscopic techniques and limited training opportunities represents a challenge to general surgery resident training. The objective of this study was to use a live porcine model to improve surgical training in laparoscopic technique and management of bleeding. Nineteen general surgery residents (ranging from PGY 3 to 5) completed the porcine simulation and completed pre-lab and post-lab questionnaires. The institution's industry partner served as sponsors and educators on hemostatic agents and energy devices. Residents had a significant increase in confidence with laparoscopic techniques and the management of hemostasis (P = .01 and P = .008, respectively). Residents agreed and then strongly agreed that a porcine model was suitable to simulate laparoscopic and hemostatic techniques, but there was no significant change between pre- and post-lab opinions. This study demonstrates that a porcine lab is an effective model for surgical resident education and increases resident confidence.

Resolution of Liver Function Tests After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is gaining traction for the management of choledocholithiasis. Liver function tests (LFTs) are often used to determine the success of ductal clearance, yet the impact of differing therapeutic interventions, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or LCBDE, have on postprocedure LFT is insufficiently described. We hypothesize that these interventions have different postoperative LFT profiles. The preprocedural and postprocedural total bilirubin (Tbili), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were analyzed of 167 patients who had successful ERCPs (117) or LCBDEs (50). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients demonstrated a significant decrease in all LFTs postprocedure (n = 117; P = <0.001 for all) with a continued downtrend when a second set of LFTs was obtained (n = 102; P = <0.001 for all). For successful LC+LCBDEs, there was no significant change between preoperative and 1st postoperative Tbili, AST, ALT, and ALP and the 2nd postoperative labs.