Glycometabolic control in acromegalic patients with diabetes: a study of the effects of different treatments for growth hormone excess and for hyperglycemia.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is frequently observed in patients with acromegaly. Current therapies for acromegaly may impact glucose regulation, influencing insulin sensitivity and secretion. The question whether these therapies modify control and progression of diabetes once present is still open. AIM: Aim of our study is to analyze glucose control in acromegalic patients with diabetes, evaluating the relation with treatments for GH excess and for diabetes. METHODS: Seventy patients with acromegaly and diabetes were studied. Duration and treatments of acromegaly and diabetes were recorded, together with clinical and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: Most patients (92.8%) were treated with somatostatin analogs (SSA), either alone or in combination with dopamine-agonists (20%) or pegvisomant (15.7%); 7.1% of patients had been treated by surgery alone. Metformin (65.7%), alone or in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs, was the most frequent treatment for diabetes, followed by insulin (21.5%). Only 15.7% were treated with diet alone. The whole cohort showed a very good control of diabetes and acromegaly. Median glycated hemoglobin was 6.4% (5.9-7). IGF-I was within normal range for age in most patients. No relation was observed between duration of acromegaly or diabetes and metabolic control. SSA had a negative effect on insulin secretion, but these effects did not influence glucose control. Finally, we observed a low prevalence of nephropathy (6%) and retinopathy (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a good control of hyperglycemia can be obtained with success in the majority of acromegalic patients with diabetes, independently of the type of treatment for GH excess.

Prevalence of Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies (GAD and IA2) in Sardinian children and adolescents with autoimmune thyroiditis.

AIMS: Type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroiditis are common autoimmune diseases characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against tissue-specific components. Non-thyroid-specific autoantibodies are frequent in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis. The prevalence of Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis is unknown. METHODS: The prevalence of Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies (GAD and IA2) was analysed in 236 Sardinian children and adolescents with autoimmune thyroiditis. GAD and IA2 antibodies were measured at the time of the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroiditis and re-evaluated after 1 year in the children who were shown to be positive. Autoantibody prevalence was evaluated in 949 healthy age-matched controls. RESULTS: The prevalence of GAD and/or IA2 antibodies was 8% in the children and adolescents with autoimmune thyroiditis and 4.1% in control subjects (P = 0.017). When Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies were separately analysed, the difference remained significant for IA2 (3.39% in autoimmune thyroiditis vs. 1.16% in control subjects, P = 0.012), but not for GAD (5.1% in autoimmune thyroiditis vs. 3.79% in control subjects, P = 0.367). Seven of 10 children with autoimmune thyroiditis and detectable Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies at the diagnosis remained positive after 1 year. In the course of 2 years of follow-up, two patients who were positive for Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies at the time of diagnosis of autoimmune thyroiditis developed diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting the prevalence of Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies in a selected cohort of genetically homogeneous children and adolescents with autoimmune thyroiditis. The main finding was that the prevalence of Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies and of newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis was significantly higher than that observed in the general paediatric population, suggesting that children with autoimmune thyroiditis are at increased risk of developing Type 1 diabetes.

Serum adiponectin is decreased in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia and normolipaemic relatives and is influenced by lipid-lowering treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypoadiponectinemia has been reported in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) presenting increased waist circumference and insulin resistance. However, no studies have evaluated this association in non-obese FCHL patients. Moreover, it is unclear whether correction of lipoprotein abnormalities may influence adiponectin levels in FCHL. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have compared serum levels of adiponectin in 199 non-obese FCHL patients (BMI 25.96+/-3.7), 116 normolipaemic (NL) non-affected relatives (BMI 24.4+/-4.0) and 192 controls (BMI 28.0+/-7.4). In a subgroup of FCHL patients, changes in adiponectin levels after treatment with atorvastatin (n=22) or fenofibrate (n=26) were also evaluated. FCHL patients as well as their NL relatives showed lower serum adiponectin levels compared to controls (9.7+/-5.4 microg/mL, 10.7+/-5.3 microg/mL and 17.3+/-13.7microg/mL, respectively; p<0.0001 for all comparisons). After controlling for confounders, the strongest association with hypoadiponectinemia was observed with family history of FCHL, followed by HDL-C (negatively) and age (positively). These variables jointly explained 15% of the total variance of serum adiponectin levels. After 24-week of treatment, adiponectin was increased by 12.5% (p<0.05) by atorvastatin and was reduced by 10% by fenofibrate, resulting in a treatment difference of 22.5% in favor of atorvastatin (p<0.017). CONCLUSIONS: FCHL patients showed lower serum adiponectin levels compared to controls. Also normolipaemic relatives of FCHL patients presented decreased levels of adiponectin, suggesting a possible common background in the determination of this abnormality. Overall, these observations indicate that hypoadiponectinemia may be an inherent characteristic of the FCHL phenotype. In FCHL patients hypoadiponectinemia may be partially corrected by atorvastatin but not by fenofibrate treatment.