Ensayo clínico fase III para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del uso de plasma rico en plaquetas frente a ácido hialurónico en coxartrosis / Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, phase III, to evaluate the use of platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in hip coxarthrosis

OBJETIVOS: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de la infiltración de plasma rico en plaquetas preparado respecto a ácido hialurónico en pacientes con coxartrosis refractaria a tratamiento conservador. Así como correlacionar el impacto clínico entre las diferentes concentraciones celulares. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Ensayo clínico fase III, doble-ciego, controlado, en el que se aleatorizaron a los pacientes en dos grupos de tratamiento (PRP o AH) con una única infiltración de cadera ecoguiada. El seguimiento fue de 12 meses, registrando escala de dolor (EVA) y escalas funcionales (HHS y WOMAC), analgesia consumida, respondedores (criterios OARSI) y efectos adversos. Se analizaron, en el grupo experimental, las concentraciones celulares en sangre periférica y en el PRP infiltrado. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 74 pacientes. Ambos grupos de tratamiento presentaron mejoría en las escalas EVA, WOMAC, HHS y reducción del consumo de analgesia en el tiempo (p < 0,05). Únicamente encontramos diferencias significativas entre grupos al año de tratamiento en los valores de HHS (Grupo PRP 70,9 [3,7-58] grupo AH 60,2[43-74,2] p < 0,05). No se registraton efectos adversos en ninguno de los grupos. Encontramos correlación entre la concentración de plaquetas en pacientes respondedores (un mes postratamiento; no respondedores 449[438-578] x103 plaquetas/μl, respondedores 565 [481-666] x103 plaquetas/μl, p < 0,044). Se correlaciona la concentración de leucocitos con las escalas clínico-funcionales (EVA 6 meses, r=0,748, p < 0,013, subescala rigidez WOMAC 6 meses, r=0,748, p < 0,013). Los pacientes con estadios de coxartrosis iniciales (KL 1 y 2) tienen mayor probabilidad de responder al tratamiento con plasma rico en plaquetas (11,51 OR, IC 95% 2,34-50,65, p < 0,03). CONCLUSIONES: La infiltración única de PRP es eficaz en términos de mejoría funcional, reducción del dolor y disminución del consumo de analgesia en coxartrosis. Los sistemas de preparación abiertos, son un procedimiento seguro para la obtención de PRP. Se deben indicar las infiltraciones de cadera en estadios evolutivos iniciales. Se debe tener en cuenta la composición celular para garantizar una repuesta clínica positiva

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To compare efficacy and safety of a home-made platelet-rich plasma (PRP) solution versus hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis not responding to conservative treatment and to correlate cellular composition of PRP to clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a phase III clinical trial, double-blinded, controlled and randomised into two treatment groups (PRP and hyaluronic acid). Patients received one hip ultrasound-guided injection. Follow up was 12 months. Pain was assessed using VAS score, HHS and WOMAC were used as functional scores, analgesia, adverse events, cellular components (PRP group) in peripheral blood and in PRP were recorded. Clinical response was assessed using OARSI criteria. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Both groups improved in VAS, WOMAC and HHS score and reduced the amount of analgesia (p<.05). Significant differences were seen at 1 year post-treatment in HHS score (PRP 70.9 [3.7-58], hyaluronic acid 60.2[43-74.2] p<.05). No adverse events were observed in none of the groups. Platelet concentration was different between responders and non-responders (at 1 month, non-responders 449[438-578] x103 platelets/μl versus responders 565 [481-666] x103 platelets/μl, p<.044). There was a correlation between leukocytes concentration and clinical scores (VAS at six months, r=0.748, p<.013, WOMAC at 6 months r=0.748, p <.013). Patients with early stage hip OA showed higher response rate to PRP compared with late stage (11.51 OR, 95%CI 2.34-50.65, p<.03). CONCLUSIONS: Platelet-rich plasma injection improved hip function, reduced pain and the use of analgesia. It is important to bear in mind the cellular composition in order to achieve a better clinical response

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, phase III, to evaluate the use of platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in hip coxarthrosis. / Ensayo clínico fase III para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del uso de plasma rico en plaquetas frente a ácido hialurónico en coxartrosis.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To compare efficacy and safety of a home-made platelet-rich plasma (PRP) solution versus hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis not responding to conservative treatment and to correlate cellular composition of PRP to clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a phase III clinical trial, double-blinded, controlled and randomised into two treatment groups (PRP and hyaluronic acid). Patients received one hip ultrasound-guided injection. Follow up was 12 months. Pain was assessed using VAS score, HHS and WOMAC were used as functional scores, analgesia, adverse events, cellular components (PRP group) in peripheral blood and in PRP were recorded. Clinical response was assessed using OARSI criteria. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Both groups improved in VAS, WOMAC and HHS score and reduced the amount of analgesia (p<.05). Significant differences were seen at 1 year post-treatment in HHS score (PRP 70.9 [3.7-58], hyaluronic acid 60.2[43-74.2] p<.05). No adverse events were observed in none of the groups. Platelet concentration was different between responders and non-responders (at 1 month, non-responders 449[438-578] x103 platelets/µl versus responders 565 [481-666] x103 platelets/µl, p<.044). There was a correlation between leukocytes concentration and clinical scores (VAS at six months, r=0.748, p<.013, WOMAC at 6 months r=0.748, p <.013). Patients with early stage hip OA showed higher response rate to PRP compared with late stage (11.51 OR, 95%CI 2.34-50.65, p<.03). CONCLUSIONS: Platelet-rich plasma injection improved hip function, reduced pain and the use of analgesia. It is important to bear in mind the cellular composition in order to achieve a better clinical response.

Physicochemical and microbiological stability of two news oral liquid formulations of clonidine hydrochloride for pediatric patients.

Pediatric patients present changing physiological features. Because of the lack of land suitable for commercial management, pediatric specialties very often need to prepare extemporaneous formulations to improve the dosage and administration of drugs for children. Oral liquid formulations are the most suitable for pediatric patients. Clonidine is widely used in the pediatric population for opioid withdrawal, hypertensive crisis, attention deficit disorders and hyperactivity syndrome, and as an analgesic in neuropathic cancer pain. The objective was to study the physicochemical and microbiological stability and determine the shelf life of an oral solution containing 20 µg/mL clonidine hydrochloride in different storage conditions (5 ± 3 °C, 25 ± 3 °C, and 40 ± 2 °C). Using raw material with excipients safe for all pediatric age groups, two oral liquid formulations of clonidine hydrochloride were designed (with and without preservatives). Solutions stored at 5 ± 3 °C (with and without preservatives) were physically and microbiologically stable for at least 90 days in closed containers and for 42 days after opening. Two oral solutions of clonidine hydrochloride 20 µg/mL were developed for pediatric use from raw materials that are readily available and easy to process, containing safe excipients that are stable over a long period of time.

[Erythropoietin: a study of its use in oncohematology]. / Eritropoyetina: estudio de utilización en oncohematología.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of erythropoietin (EPO) in a Clinical Oncohematology Unit within a general hospital, and to propose a therapeutic algorithm with EPO based on recommendations by ASCO. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out on patients who required support treatment with EPO while in the Oncohematology Unit during the year 2001. Data were collected by reviewing patient medical records. An effective treatment was defined as an increase in baseline hemoglobin (Hb) equal to or higher than 2 g/dL over 4-8 weeks, with no transfusion requirements or decreased transfusion needs. Baseline Hb values, their distribution per diagnosis, and the involvement of platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 353 patients in chemotherapy, 87% corresponded to oncologic diagnoses while the rest had hematological neoplasms. A total of 54 patients were assessed, with 83% of these corresponding to the oncologic area. Oncologic diagnoses that most required the use of EPO included: head-neck 53%, genitourinary 39%, and lung 39%. Overall effectiveness was 57% (60% in oncology and 44% in hematology). The Hb value leading to initial prescription (baseline Hb) was always below 10 g/dL for the hematology area, whereas most oncology patients exhibited higher levels at therapy onset. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Its percentage of failure: 40% for oncology and 56% for hematology patients, together with its high cost, shows that a further search for predictive factors is warranted in order to more precisely select individuals who may benefit from this therapy. 2. The percentage of oncology patients with baseline Hb <10 is only 29%. Baseline Hb values for treatment onset and peak Hb values for therapy discontinuation should be agreed upon. Treatment initiation when Hb values fall below 10 g/dL would be a reasonable option, and a decision to use EPO above 10 g/dL should be made in patients with less severe anemia (10-12 g/dL) only if clinical circumstances render it advisable. 3. Use protocols must include clear concept definitions for treatment, and for primary and secondary prophylaxis, which will help in the establishment of therapeutic algorithms.