The effect of an exertional field-test on sport concussion assessment tool 5 subcomponents in University rugby and wrestling athletes: A pilot prospective case series.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how an exertional field-test impacts the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5) subcomponents in uninjured athletes. DESIGN: Prospective case-series. SETTING: Sports medicine setting. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 37 rugby and wrestling athletes (76% female) with a median age of 19 years (range: 18-23). Twenty-one (57%) had a history of concussion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The SCAT5 was administered prior-to and following a volitionally fatiguing, field-based 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test. The primary outcome measures included: total symptom scores and severity, standardized assessment of concussion, neurological screening, and balance errors during the modified balance error scoring system. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests examined differences in ordinal data between pre- and post-exertion with Bonferroni corrections (alpha = 0.006). Data were also stratified into time to SCAT5 administration post-exertion and compared via Cliff's Delta (d). RESULTS: The SCAT5 was administered a median of 20-min (interquartile range: 14-26-min) following exertion. No differences were found pre- and post-exertion across all SCAT5 metrics (p > 0.048). Within the post-exertion 0-10-min stratification, total symptoms and severity scores appeared to be elevated with a large effect size (d ≥ 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: While SCAT5 metrics were not statistically altered when quantified a median of 20-min following high-intensity exertion; greater symptom reporting may occur 10-min following exertion.

One-year stability of preseason Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5) values in university level collision and combative sport athletes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the stability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) 5 between consecutive seasons in uninjured collision and combative varsity athletes. METHODS: Thirty-six athletes (19 females) were recruited to participate (wrestling [n = 12], rugby [n = 14], and hockey [n = 10]). The SCAT5 was administration at the start of the 2017 and 2018 seasons. Median baseline demographics for 2017 were as follows: age (19 years [range: 17-24 years]), height (174 cm [range: 149-195 cm]), and weight (76 kg [range: 57-118 kg]). Outcome metrics included subcomponents of the SCAT5: symptom reporting, standardized assessment of concussion (SAC), neurological screening, and balance performance measured with the modified balance error scoring system (mBESS). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Cronbach's alpha (α) values were calculated to determine the stability between consecutive years for the SCAT5 variables in the same cohort of athletes. Bonferroni corrections were applied for Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, where alpha = 0.006 (0.05/9). RESULTS: Between the 2017 and 2018 seasons, no differences were noted in symptom reporting (p = 0.14), SAC (p = 0.32), neurological screening (p = 0.98), and balance performance on the mBESS (p = 0.01). The Cronbach's alpha displayed unacceptable to questionable levels of within-subject stability (range: α = 0.34-0.70) for all subcomponents, except months in reverse order (α = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: While no statistical differences were present for all SCAT5 subcomponent metrics between 2017 and 2018 baselines, all but one displayed unacceptable to questionable stability (α ≤ 0.70) when retested one year later. Further research is needed to understand the appropriate time duration baseline SCAT5 values can reliably be utilized within longitudinal studies; as well as the normal variation of SCAT5 reporting/scoring.

The effect of high-intensity physical exertion on measures of cervical spine, vestibular/ocular-motor screening, and vestibulo-ocular reflex function in university level collision and combative sport athletes.

OBJECTIVES: To examine how high-intensity physical exertion affects clinical measures of cervical spine (CSp), vestibular/ocular motor screen (VOMS), and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Sports Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 37 athletes consented to participate (22 rugby, 15 wrestling; 9 men, 28 women; median age = 19 years [range 17-23 years]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included tests of CSp (cervical flexor endurance, head perturbation test, cervical flexion rotation test and anterolateral strength), VOR (head thrust test and dynamic visual acuity [DVA]), and a quantified version of the VOMS. These metrics were assessed prior to and after completing the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test. Bland-Altman plots and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were utilized to analyze the data using an alpha of p < 0.004. RESULTS: Cervical anterolateral strength (kg) was reduced post-exertion on the left (z = 3.87; p < 0.001), but not on the right between conditions (z = -1.49; p = 0.14). Athletes reported increased dizziness (z = -3.55; p = 0.004) and had reduced DVA following exertion (z = -2.78; p < 0.001). All other metrics were not significantly different following exertion (p > 0.011). CONCLUSION: Reduced performance on DVA, decreased left-anterolateral strength, and increased dizziness occurred following high-intensity exertion in varsity collision and combative athletes, which has implications for sideline screening for sport-related concussion.

Increasing access to CBT for psychosis patients: a feasibility, randomised controlled trial evaluating brief, targeted CBT for distressing voices delivered by assistant psychologists (GiVE2).

BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is offered to all patients with a psychosis diagnosis. However, only a minority of psychosis patients in England and Wales are offered CBTp. This is attributable, in part, to the resource-intensive nature of CBTp. One response to this problem has been the development of CBTp in brief formats that are targeted at a single symptom and the mechanisms that maintain distress. We have developed a brief form of CBTp for distressing voices and reported preliminary evidence for its effectiveness when delivered by highly trained therapists (clinical psychologists). This study will investigate the delivery of this intervention by a cost-effective workforce of assistant psychologists following a brief training and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a future, definitive, randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: This is a feasibility study for a pragmatic, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority 1:1:1 RCT comparing a Guided self-help CBT intervention for voices and treatment as usual (GiVE) to Supportive Counselling and treatment as usual (SC) to treatment as usual alone (TAU), recruiting across two sites, with blinded post-treatment and follow-up assessments. A process evaluation will quantitatively and qualitatively explore stakeholder experience. DISCUSSION: Expected outcomes will include an assessment of the feasibility of conducting a definitive RCT, and data to inform the calculation of its sample size. If evidence from a subsequent, fully powered RCT suggests that GiVE is clinically and cost-effective when delivered by briefly trained assistant psychologists, CBTp offered in these less resource-intensive forms has the potential to generate benefits for individual patients (reduced distress, enhanced recovery and enhanced quality of life), service-level patient benefit (increased access to evidence-based psychological therapies) and economic benefits to the NHS (in terms of the reduced use of mental health inpatient services). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN registration number: 16166070. Registered on 5 February 2019.