Anatomo-radiological study supporting the use of ipsilateral nasoseptal flap for the transpterygoid management of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles. A review of 21 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical treatment of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles involves the reduction of the meningocele, watertight closure and defect coverage with a nasoseptal flap (NSF). It can be performed contralaterally or ipsilaterally: in the latter situation, the pedicle of the flap must be dissected into the pterygopalatine fossa. The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefit of using an ipsilateral NSF in transpterygoid approaches for the management of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles, compared to a contralateral NSF, based on a radiological study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective monocentric study of 21 cases, between 2002 and 2018. Measurement of the NSF lengths, and lengths needed to cover the defect were evaluated on the preoperative scanner. Early and later failure and complication rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen cases of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles with available CT scan were identified. The mean duration of follow up was 27.9 months [1-147]. Theoretical lengths of the ipsi and contralateral NSF were comparable: 71.4±7.8mm vs. 78.8±8mm, P=0.729. In 8 cases/18 (42%), the theoretical length of the contralateral NSF was not long enough to cover the defect beyond the V2 (mean lack of 8.87±6.6mm). In all cases, the theoretical length of the ipsilateral NSF was sufficient to cover the defect. In the case series, failure and complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION: The use of an ipsilateral NSF for the transpterygoid management of temporo-sphenoidal meningoceles, although more complex, allows a better coverage of the defect, compared to the contralateral NSF, which is not long enough in 42% of cases.

Local extension staging of sinonasal tumours: retrospective comparison between CT/MRI assessment and pathological findings.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of clinical staging with CT and MRI in sinonasal cancers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for a sinonasal cancer. The 7th edition of the TNM classification was used to establish tumour staging. Standardised preoperative CT/MRI staging was compared with the pathological staging based on specimens obtained during surgery from each subsite within and around the tumour. RESULTS: We analysed data from 68 patients between January 2010 and December 2014. A comparison of cT and pT stages was established for 49 naso-ethmoidal and 16 maxillary tumours. Clinical staging for naso-ethmoidal cT1 and maxillary cT2 was consistent with pathological results. Clinical staging for naso-ethmoidal cT2, cT3 and cT4b was overstated in comparison with pT findings. The positive predictive value of imaging was <65% for the lamina papyracea, the cribriform plate, the dura, and the frontal and sphenoid sinuses. Sensitivity was over 75% for each anatomical site except for the cribriform plate (73.3%) and the sphenoid sinus (57.2%). CONCLUSION: Systematic pathologic analysis of the anatomical areas around the sinonasal cancer has to be applied in further studies to improve our therapeutic management. CT/MRI mapping cannot replace accurate assessment of tumour extension during surgery.