Health literacy in female patients affected by anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a cross-sectional study with pair-matched controls.

PURPOSE: Health Literacy (HL) consists in all the skills and knowledges used by people to understand and seek health-related information. Inadequate levels of HL substantially affect many different aspects of health. The primary aim of the present study was to assess levels of HL in female patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), compared with matched control subjects. METHODS: A consecutive series of 64 female patients with AN and BN (mean age 23.1 ± 7.0) was enrolled, matched with 64 female control subjects (mean age 23.7 ± 7.1). Both groups completed the Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), which evaluate subjective and objective HL level respectively. RESULTS: Patients with AN and BN showed lower levels of subjective HL (10.0 ± 3.5 vs. 11.3 ± 3.0) and higher levels of objective HL (5.0 ± 1.3 vs. 3.6 ± 1.6) when compared with controls. No difference between AN and BN was found. No correlation between HLS-EU-Q16 Total Score and duration of illness was found. A negative correlation was found between EDE-Q Eating Concerns and subjective HL levels. HLS-EU-Q16 Total Score was predicted by educational level in control subjects only, while NVS Total Score was not predicted by educational level in control subjects nor in patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with AN and BN had lower levels of subjective HL. NVS scores could overestimate objective HL in female patients with AN and BN. The promotion of HL in areas differing from those that concern nutritional characteristics of food, could be a therapeutic target for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.

Orthorexia nervosa and type 1 diabetes: results of a cross-sectional study.

AIM: Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a condition characterized by an excessive importance attributed to the intake of healthy foods. This study was aimed at investigating the prevalence of ON in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared to control subjects. METHODS: Patient with T1D using either flash glucose monitoring or continuous glucose monitoring were enrolled. For the selection of control group, each patient was asked to indicate one non-diabetic subject of their same sex and approximate age among colleagues at work and school. Patients and controls completed the following questionnaires: ORTO-15, Dusseldorf Orthorexie Scale (DOS), Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The principal outcome was the prevalence of ON among T1D and control subjects. RESULTS: We enrolled 44 patients with T1D aged 39.7 ± 15.7 years, with BMI 24.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2, and mean HbA1c 53.5 [49-57] mmol/mol. Control subjects were similar to T1D with respect to sex, age and BMI. Thirty-two [72%] and 29 [65%] subjects among patients and controls, respectively, had ORTO15 < 40 (between-group p = 0.48). Two (4.5%) and zero subjects among patients and controls, respectively, had DOS ≥ 30 (p = 0.29). Median scores of DOS, but not of ORTO-15, were significantly higher in patients than in controls. None of the metabolic variables showed a correlation with psychometric tests in T1D. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of ON was not significantly higher in T1D than in controls, patients with T1D showed higher scores of some, but not all, tests assessing orthorexia, without any significant correlation with metabolic parameters.

Orthorexia among patients with eating disorders, student dietitians and general population: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Orthorexia is a recent construct describing an unhealthy and extreme concern for healthy food. To date, its relationship with other eating disorders (EDs) remains unclear, and little is known about the development of this condition. Current literature suggests that a thorough knowledge about nutrition and alimentation, as in the case of experts in the field of dietetics, could foster the development of orthorexic tendencies. The aim of this study was to compare orthorexia between ED patients, student dietitians and general population. METHODS: A total of 90 female participants (age: 18-29 years) were recruited: 30 ED patients, 30 student dietitians and 30 control subjects, matched for age and sex. Orthorexia, ED-specific and general psychopathology were evaluated using self-report questionnaires (ORTO-15, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Symptom Checklist-90-Revised). RESULTS: Eating disorder patients had significantly higher orthorexic tendencies than other groups (p < 0.001), while student dietitians and general population showed no difference between each other (p = 0.96). Moreover, orthorexia positively correlated to ED psychopathology in ED patients (p = 0.004), but not in control groups. CONCLUSION: Our data do not confirm previous suggestions that experts in the field of dietetics may display a higher level of orthorexia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cross-sectional observational study (case series).