A ‘joint’ approach: design, implementation and preliminary outcomes of an early conservative knee and hip osteoarthritis service in northern New South Wales, Australia.

Australia is facing a growing burden of knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA). To address this demand in northern New South Wales, a community health-based conservative OA joint management service was established in the Tweed Valley. This paper describes the design, implementation and initial evaluation of the service. Following the principles of clinical redesign, a diagnostic phase involving consultation with key stakeholders revealed several issues. OA patients could wait up to 9 months for review by orthopaedic specialist following GP referral and received limited information on how to conservatively manage their conditions. GPs were constrained by short consultations and had limited knowledge of the latest recommendations for the conservative treatment of OA. GPs also highlighted the limitations of outdated fax systems for communication, noting their preference for secure electronic messaging. Based on these findings, the Tweed Knee and Hip Arthritis Service was established. For patients not on a waiting list for surgery, the service provides evidence-based conservative management for knee or hip OA involving standardised assessment, education, exercise, self-management strategies and regular review. An analysis of a foundational cohort of patients demonstrated improvements in a suite of validated and standardised measures for pain and function, with improvements seen as early as 1 month and sustained for 6 months. The study findings support the introduction of integrated conservative OA management models of care directly available to primary healthcare providers.

Knowledge and predictors of dysplasia surveillance performance in inflammatory bowel diseases in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Dysplasia surveillance is recognized as an integral component in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The adherence to surveillance guidelines is variable, and understanding of quality indicators and predictors of behavior is currently limited. OBJECTIVE: To perform a nationwide evaluation of the quality of IBD surveillance practiced by Australian endoscopists and to determine the predictors of quality practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional nationwide survey. SETTING: Survey distributed through the gastroenterology and colorectal surgery societies covering knowledge and practice of IBD surveillance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Adherence to indicators of high-quality surveillance and median score of IBD surveillance guideline knowledge. RESULTS: A total of 264 responses were received, comprising 240 respondents who perform surveillance screening (218 gastroenterologists, 46 colorectal surgeons). Gastroenterologists were significantly more likely to undertake surveillance (P < .001), adhere to guidelines (P = .02), use advanced imaging modalities (P = .04), and have greater surveillance knowledge than colorectal surgeons (P < .001). Knowledge score and gastroenterologists were independent predictors of dysplasia screening (odds ratio [OR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-1.96 and OR 11.2; 95% CI, 4.53-27.87), guideline adherence (OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31 and OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.11-5.30), and advanced endoscopic imaging technique use (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35 and OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.02-4.74). LIMITATIONS: Potential responder bias results appear, however, aligned with those of previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: IBD dysplasia surveillance in Australia is being performed at a high standard. Gastroenterology specialization and knowledge score have been demonstrated to be strong predictors of high-quality surveillance practice. This is the first study to determine predictors of screening behavior and quantify surveillance quality. These results further emphasize that gastroenterologists should play a key role in IBD surveillance.