Cytochrome P-450-mediated herb and food-drug interactions can be identified in cancer patients through patient self-reporting with a tablet application: results of a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Consumption of herbs, food used as medicine and dietary supplements (HFDSs) is common in cancer patients. Herbs and food-drug interactions (HFDIs) can lead to serious adverse effects and can be prevented. We previously reviewed cytochrome P-450 (CYP)-mediated HFDI for 261 HFDSs and we classified the risk of CYP inhibition and induction on a level of evidence scale from 1 (high evidence, supported by several clinical studies) to 5 (low evidence, only limited preclinical data). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, non-interventional study (NCT04128865) to assess whether self-assessment of patients could detect HFDI classified as 'probable' (i.e. level 1, 2 or 3 of the scale) in a population of cancer patients. Patients were invited through a tablet application to report their consumption of herbs, regular CYP-interacting food consumption and dietary supplements, as well as some clinical data and cancer treatments. The patient's completion of the survey could be supervised by a health care professional or not. A prespecified threshold of 5% of HFDIs classified as 'probable' detected with the application was deemed relevant. RESULTS: Between 29 March 2018 and 22 June 2018, 143 patients completed the survey. Ninety-five patients (66%) reported at least one current systemic cancer treatment and were included in the analyses. Seventy-four patients reported an intake of at least one HFDS (77.9%), while 21 patients reported no HFDS (22.1%). Twenty-two HFDIs classified as 'probable' were found in 16 patients (16.8%) with the application, which was significantly superior to the prespecified threshold (P = 0.02). The interactions were reported with food (n = 19, 86%) more frequently than with herbs (n = 3, 14%) or with dietary supplements (no interaction reported). CONCLUSIONS: Self-assessment of HFDS interaction with cancer treatment with an application is feasible and should be considered in daily routine. Prospective interventional studies should be conducted to better assess the clinical benefits of this approach.

[Prognostic value of PD-1/PD-L1 expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Intérêt pronostique de l'expression de PD-1/PD-L1 dans les tumeurs de la voie excrétrice urinaire supérieure.

Current literature supports the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of urothelial carcinomas. While the prognostic value of PD-1 and PD-L1 levels has been comprehensively analyzed for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, less is known for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. In addition, available data on the prognostic value of PD-1 and/or PD-L1 level in the tumor and/or peritumoral microenvironment are heterogeneous and even sometimes contradictory. In this article, we compared the methodologies of the various available studies in order to highlight the factors that can explain these discordant results.