Calcifediol Treatment and COVID-19-Related Outcomes.

CONTEXT: COVID-19 is a major health problem because of saturation of intensive care units (ICU) and mortality. Vitamin D has emerged as a potential treatment able to reduce the disease severity. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to elucidate the effect of 25(OH)D3 (calcifediol) treatment on COVID-19-related outcomes. METHODS: This observational cohort study was conducted from March to May 2020, among patients admitted to COVID-19 wards of Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. A total of 930 patients with COVID-19 were included; 92 were excluded because of previous calcifediol intake. Of the remaining 838, a total of 447 received calcifediol (532 µg on day 1 plus 266 µg on days 3, 7, 15, and 30), whereas 391 were not treated at the time of hospital admission (intention-to-treat). Of the latter, 53 patients were treated later during ICU admission and were allocated in the treated group in a second analysis. In healthy individuals, calcifediol is about 3.2-fold more potent on a weight basis than cholecalciferol. Main outcome measures were ICU admission and mortality. RESULTS: ICU assistance was required by 102 (12.2%) participants. Out of 447 patients treated with calcifediol at admission, 20 (4.5%) required the ICU, compared to 82 (21%) out of 391 nontreated (P < .001). Logistic regression of calcifediol treatment on ICU admission, adjusted by age, sex, linearized 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at baseline, and comorbidities showed that treated patients had a reduced risk of requiring the ICU (odds ratio [OR] 0.13; 95% CI 0.07-0.23). Overall mortality was 10%. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 21 (4.7%) out of 447 patients treated with calcifediol at admission died compared to 62 patients (15.9%) out of 391 nontreated (P = .001). Adjusted results showed a reduced mortality risk with an OR of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.10-0.43). In the second analysis, the obtained OR was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27-0.99). CONCLUSION: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, calcifediol treatment significantly reduced ICU admission and mortality.

Assessment of early therapy discontinuation and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors: B-ABLE cohort study.

PURPOSE: The most frequent adverse effects of aromatase inhibitors (AI) are arthralgia and bone loss induction. These reduce the quality of life of patients and their adherence to the treatment. This study evaluates the early AI cessation caused by AI intolerance, and the evolution of joint pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during AI treatment until 1-year after AI completion. METHODS: Data of 910 women diagnosed with early breast cancer and candidates for AI were recruited in B-ABLE cohort. AI discontinuation was analyzed by survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression. Patients were distributed in three groups of the study according to previous tamoxifen (TAM) exposure and length of AI treatment: TAM-2yAI, TAM-3yAI, and 5yAI. Evolution of joint pain and HRQoL in osteoporosis was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and ECOS-16 tests, respectively, from baseline to 1-year after AI completion through repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Risk of AI discontinuation was increased in patients previously exposed to tamoxifen compared to non-exposed (adjusted HR 5.30 [95% CI 2.23 to 12.57]). VAS and ECOS-16 scores of TAM-2yAI and TAM-3yAI groups increased during AI treatment, mainly during the first 3-12 months. After 1-year from AI completion, values tend to decrease to baseline levels. In 5yAI group, VAS and ECOS-16 levels increased at three months, and VAS remained significantly higher at 1-year post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AI therapy increased joint pain and reduced HRQoL, mainly during the first year of treatment. Patients previously treated with tamoxifen experienced greater pain when they switched to AI therapy and had an excess risk of discontinuation during the first 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03811509. Registered 28 January 2018-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03811509 .

Safety and efficacy of the 0 h/3 h protocol for rapid rule out of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The early and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an important medical and economic challenge. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the performance of the new European Society of Cardiology rapid 0-hour/3-hour (0 h/3 h) rule out protocol for AMI. METHODS: We enrolled 2,727 consecutive patients presenting with suspected AMI without persistent ST-segment elevation to the emergency department in a prospective international multicenter study. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. The performance of the 0 h/3 h rule out protocol was evaluated using 4 high-sensitivity (primary analysis) and 3 sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays. RESULTS: Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 473 patients (17.3%). Using the 4 high-sensitivity cTn assays, the 0-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.8% (95% [confidence interval] CI, 98.7%-100%), 99.6% (95% CI, 98.5%-99.9%), 100% (95% CI, 97.9%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 98.0%-100%) of late presenters (>6 h from chest pain onset). The 3-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.9% (95% CI, 99.1%-100%), 99.5% (95% CI, 98.3%-99.9%), 100% (95% CI, 98.1%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 98.2%-100%) of early presenters (<6 h from chest pain onset). Using the 3 sensitive cTn assays, the 0-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.6% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.9%), 99.0% (95% CI, 96.9%-99.7%), and 99.1% (95% CI, 97.2%-99.8%) of late presenters; and the 3-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.4% (95% CI, 98.3%-99.8%), 99.2% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.8%), and 99.0% (95% CI, 97.2%-99.7%) of early presenters. Overall, the 0 h/3 h rule out protocol assigned 40% to 60% of patients to rule out. None of the patients assigned rule out died during 3-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The 0 h/3 h rule out protocol seems to allow the accurate rule out of AMI using both high-sensitivity and sensitive cTn measurements in conjunction with clinical assessment. Additional studies are warranted for external validation.

Impact of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin on use of coronary angiography, cardiac stress testing, and time to discharge in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays provide higher diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when compared with conventional assays, but may result in increased use of unnecessary coronary angiographies due to their increased detection of cardiomyocyte injury in conditions other than AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the impact of the clinical introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) on the use of coronary angiography, stress testing, and time to discharge in 2544 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI to the emergency department (ED) within a multicentre study either before (1455 patients) or after (1089 patients) hs-cTnT introduction. Acute myocardial infarction was more often the clinical discharge diagnosis after hs-cTnT introduction (10 vs. 14%, P < 0.001), while unstable angina less often the clinical discharge diagnosis (14 vs. 9%, P = 0.007). The rate of coronary angiography was similar before and after the introduction of hs-cTnT (23 vs. 23%, P = 0.092), as was the percentage of coronary angiographies showing no stenosis (11 vs. 7%, P = 0.361). In contrast, the use of stress testing was substantially reduced from 29 to 19% (P < 0.001). In outpatients, median time to discharge from the ED decreased by 79 min (P < 0.001). Mean total costs decreased by 20% in outpatients after the introduction of hs-cTnT (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The clinical introduction of hs-cTn does not lead to an increased or inappropriate use of coronary angiography. Introduction of hs-cTn is associated with an improved rule-out process and thereby reduces the need for stress testing and time to discharge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier, NCT00470587.

Optimal Cutoff Levels of More Sensitive Cardiac Troponin Assays for the Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Renal Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether more sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays maintain their clinical utility in patients with renal dysfunction. Moreover, their optimal cutoff levels in this vulnerable patient population have not previously been defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter study, we examined the clinical utility of 7 more sensitive cTn assays (3 sensitive and 4 high-sensitivity cTn assays) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. Among 2813 unselected patients, 447 (16%) had renal dysfunction (defined as Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)). The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including coronary angiography and serial levels of high-sensitivity cTnT. Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 36% of all patients with renal dysfunction. Among patients with renal dysfunction and elevated baseline cTn levels (≥99th percentile), acute myocardial infarction was the most common diagnosis for all assays (range, 45%-80%). In patients with renal dysfunction, diagnostic accuracy at presentation, quantified by the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve, was 0.87 to 0.89 with no significant differences between the 7 more sensitive cTn assays and further increased to 0.91 to 0.95 at 3 hours. Overall, the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve in patients with renal dysfunction was only slightly lower than in patients with normal renal function. The optimal receiver-operator characteristic curve-derived cTn cutoff levels in patients with renal dysfunction were significantly higher compared with those in patients with normal renal function (factor, 1.9-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: More sensitive cTn assays maintain high diagnostic accuracy in patients with renal dysfunction. To ensure the best possible clinical use, assay-specific optimal cutoff levels, which are higher in patients with renal dysfunction, should be considered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

Incremental value of copeptin to highly sensitive cardiac Troponin I for rapid rule-out of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The incremental value of copeptin, a novel marker of endogenous stress, for rapid rule-out of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is unclear when sensitive or even high-sensitivity cardiac troponin cTn (hs-cTn) assays are used. METHODS: In an international multicenter study we evaluated 1929 consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Measurements of copeptin, three sensitive and three hs-cTn assays were performed at presentation in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all clinical information including coronary angiography and levels of hs-cTnT. The incremental value in the diagnosis of NSTEMI was quantified using four outcome measures: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV). Early presenters (< 4h since chest pain onset) were a pre-defined subgroup. RESULTS: NSTEMI was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 358 (18.6%) patients. As compared to the use of cTn alone, copeptin significantly increased AUC for two (33%) and IDI (between 0.010 and 0.041 (all p < 0.01)), sensitivity and NPV for all six cTn assays (100%); NPV to 96-99% when the 99 th percentile of the respective cTnI assay was combined with a copeptin level of 9 pmol/l (all p < 0.01). The incremental value in early presenters was similar to that of the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: When used for rapid rule-out of NSTEM in combination with sensitive or hs-cTnI assays, copeptin provides a numerically small, but statistically and likely also clinically significant incremental value.

Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to prospectively validate a novel 1-hour algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement for early rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: In a multicentre study, we enrolled 1320 patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute MI. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T 1-hour algorithm, incorporating baseline values as well as absolute changes within the first hour, was validated against the final diagnosis. The final diagnosis was then adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including coronary angiography, echocardiography, follow-up data and serial measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels. RESULTS: Acute MI was the final diagnosis in 17.3% of patients. With application of the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T 1-hour algorithm, 786 (59.5%) patients were classified as "rule-out," 216 (16.4%) were classified as "rule-in" and 318 (24.1%) were classified to the "observational zone." The sensitivity and the negative predictive value for acute MI in the rule-out zone were 99.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.6%-99.9%) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.3%-100%), respectively. The specificity and the positive predictive value for acute MI in the rule-in zone were 95.7% (95% CI 94.3%-96.8%) and 78.2% (95% CI 72.1%-83.6%), respectively. The 1-hour algorithm provided higher negative and positive predictive values than the standard interpretation of highsensitivity cardiac troponin T using a single cut-off level (both p < 0.05). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 0.0%, 1.6% and 1.9% in patients classified in the rule-out, observational and rule-in groups, respectively (p = 0.001). INTERPRETATION: This rapid strategy incorporating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T baseline values and absolute changes within the first hour substantially accelerated the management of suspected acute MI by allowing safe rule-out as well as accurate rule-in of acute MI in 3 out of 4 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00470587.

One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to prospectively derive and validate a novel 1h-algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) for early rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter diagnostic study enrolling 1811 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all available information, including coronary angiography, echocardiography, follow-up data, and serial measurements of hs-cTnT (but not hs-cTnI). The hs-cTnI 1h-algorithm, incorporating measurements performed at baseline and absolute changes within 1 hour, was derived in a randomly selected sample of 906 patients (derivation cohort), and then validated in the remaining 905 patients (validation cohort). RESULTS: Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 18% of patients. After applying the hs-cTnI 1h-algorithm developed in the derivation cohort to the validation cohort, 50.5% of patients could be classified as "rule-out," 19% as "rule-in," 30.5% as "observe." In the validation cohort, the negative predictive value for acute myocardial infarction in the "rule-out" zone was 99.6% (95% confidence interval, 98.4%-100%), and the positive predictive value for acute myocardial infarction in the "rule-in" zone was 73.9% (95% confidence interval, 66.7%-80.2%). Negative predictive value of the 1h-algorithm was higher compared with the classical dichotomous interpretation of hs-cTnI and to the standard of care combining hs-cTnI with the electrocardiogram (both P < .001). Positive predictive value also was higher compared with the standard of care (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Using a simple algorithm incorporating baseline hs-cTnI values and the absolute change within the first hour allows safe rule-out as well as accurate rule-in of acute myocardial infarction in 70% of patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin.

BACKGROUND: We examined whether undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin (hs-cTn) can be used to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a single blood draw at presentation to the emergency department (ED). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter study we used 4 different hs-cTn assays (hs-cTnT Roche, and hs-cTnI Siemens, hs-cTnI Beckman Coulter and hs-cTnI Abbott) in consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available data including serial hs-cTnT levels. Mean follow up was 24 months. Among 2072 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnT levels, 21% had an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI. Among AMI patients, 98.2% had initially detectable levels of hs-cTnT (sensitivity 98.2%, 95%CI 96.3%-99.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%, 95%CI 97.0%-99.3%). Undetectable levels of hs-cTnT ruled out AMI in 26.5% of patients at presentation. The NPV was similar with the three hs-cTnI assays: among 1180 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Siemens), the NPV was 98.8%; among 1151 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Beckman Coulter), the NPV was 99.2%; among 1567 consecutive patients with available hs-cTnI (Abbott), the NPV was 100.0%. The percentage of patients with undetectable levels of hs-cTnI was similar among the three hs-cTnI assays and ranged from 11.4% to 13.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Undetectable levels of hs-cTn at presentation have a very high NPV and seem to allow the simple and rapid rule out of AMI. This criteria applies to much more patients with hs-TnT as compared to the investigated hs-cTnI assays.

Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin in the early evaluation of acute chest pain patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) in the early diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain in comparison with established and novel biomarkers and risk scores. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, international, multi-center trial (APACE), MR-proADM was determined in 1179 unselected patients with acute chest pain. Patients were followed for 24 months. RESULTS: MR-proADM concentrations at presentation were higher in patients with AMI (median: 0.78 nmol/l, IQR 0.60-1.13) than in patients with other diagnoses (0.64 nmol/l, IQR 0.49-0.86 nmol/l; p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of MR-proADM for AMI as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.66. Adding MR-proADM to hs-cTnT could not improve its diagnostic accuracy for AMI (p=0.431). Seventy-six percent of all deaths occurred in the fourth quartile of MR-proADM (>0.90 nmol/l). Adding MR-proADM to the TIMI-score (AUC 0.87) predicted 1-year mortality more accurately than the TIMI-score alone (AUC 0.82; p<0.001). Net reclassification improvement (TIMI vs. additionally MR-proADM) amounted to 0.137 (p=0.012). MR-proADM had higher prognostic accuracy as compared to hs-cTnT in patients with AMI (p=0.015) and in those without AMI (p=0.003). MR-proADM at presentation was tantamount to GRACE score and BNP as to its prognostic accuracy for mortality. The AUC for the prediction of cardiovascular events amounted to 0.63. CONCLUSIONS: While MR-proADM does not have clinical utility in the early diagnosis of AMI or predicting cardiovascular events in patients with acute chest pain, it may provide prognostic value for all-cause mortality.

Determinants of high-sensitivity troponin T among patients with a noncardiac cause of chest pain.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown to what extent noncardiac causes, including renal dysfunction, may contribute to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels. METHODS: In an observational international multicenter study, we enrolled consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Of 1181 patients enrolled, 572 were adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists to have a noncardiac cause of chest pain. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the important predictors of log-transformed high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the prognostic significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T>0.014 µg/L (99th percentile). RESULTS: A total of 88 patients (15%) had high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T>0.014 µg/L. Less than 50% of cardiac troponins could be explained by known cardiac or noncardiac diseases. In decreasing order of importance, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease (adjusted r(2) 0.44) emerged as significant factors in linear regression analysis to predict high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T was best explained by a linear curve with age as ≤0.014 µg/L. Patients with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels>0.014 µg/L were at increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-10.6; P=.02) during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Among the known covariates, age and not renal dysfunction is the most important determinant of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Because known cardiac and noncardiac factors, including renal dysfunction, explain less than 50% of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels among patients with a noncardiac cause of chest pain, unknown or underestimated cardiac involvement during the acute presenting condition seems to be the major cause of elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T.

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease using more sensitive cardiac troponin assays.

AIMS: We sought to examine the diagnostic and prognostic utility of sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays in patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multicentre study to examine the diagnostic accuracy of one high-sensitive and two sensitive cTn assays in 1098 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), of whom 401 (37%) had pre-existing CAD. Measurements of Roche high-sensitive cTnT (hs-cTnT), Siemens cTnI-Ultra, Abbott-Architect cTnI and the standard assay (Roche cTnT) were performed in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 19% of CAD patients. Among patients with diagnoses other than AMI, baseline cTn levels were elevated above the 99th percentile with Roche hs-cTnT in 40%, with Siemens TnI-Ultra in 15%, and Abbott-Architect cTnI in 13% of them. In patients with pre-existing CAD, the diagnostic accuracy at presentation, quantified by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), was significantly greater for the sensitive cTn assays compared with the standard assay (AUC for Roche hs-cTnT, 0.92; Siemens cTnI-Ultra, 0.94; and Abbott-Architect cTnI, 0.93 vs. AUC for the standard assay, 0.87; P < 0.01 for all comparisons). Elevated levels of cTn measured with the sensitive assays predicted mortality irrespective of pre-existing CAD, age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: Sensitive cTn assays have high-diagnostic accuracy also in CAD patients. Mild elevations are common in non-AMI patients and test-specific optimal cut-off levels tend to be higher in CAD patients than in patients without history of CAD. Sensitive cTn assays also retain prognostic value. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00470587).

Patients with acute coronary syndrome and normal high-sensitivity troponin.

BACKGROUND: Failure to identify patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a serious clinical problem. The incidence, characteristics, and outcome of ACS patients with normal high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels at presentation are unknown. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, hs-cTnT was determined in a blinded fashion in 1181 consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. The final diagnosis of ACS was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Patients were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: ACS was the adjudicated diagnosis in 351 patients (30%), including 187 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 164 patients with unstable angina (UA). At presentation, hs-cTnT was normal (<.014 ug/L) in 112 ACS patients (32%), including 11 patients (6%) with AMI and 101 patients (62%) with UA (P <.001). Multivariable analysis revealed previous statin treatment, younger age, preserved renal function, and the absence of ST deviation on the electrocardiogram as independently associated with normal hs-cTnT levels. Mortality rates in ACS patients with normal hs-cTnT level were 0.0% at 30 days, 0.0% at 90 days, and 2.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.5-7.9) at 360 days, which was significantly lower than in ACS patients with elevated hs-cTnT level at presentation (17.5% at 360 days, P <.001). Conversely, AMI rates at 360 days was higher in ACS patients with normal versus elevated hs-cTnT levels (P=.004). CONCLUSION: Almost one third of ACS patients have normal hs-cTnT levels at presentation, mostly patients with UA. ACS patients with normal hs-cTnT have a very low mortality, but an increased rate of AMI during the subsequent 360 days.

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly using more sensitive cardiac troponin assays.

AIMS: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays in elderly patients, since elevated levels with sensitive cTn assays were reported in 20% of elderly patients without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multi-centre study, we included 1098 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI, 406 (37%) were >70 years old. Measurement of three investigational sensitive cTn assays [Roche high-sensitive cTnT (hs-cTnT), Siemens cTnI-Ultra, and Abbott-Architect cTnI) and the standard assay (Roche cTnT) was performed in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. Acute myocardial infarction was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 24% of elderly patients. Among elderly patients without AMI, baseline cTn levels were elevated above the 99th percentile in 51% with Roche hs-cTnT, in 17% with Siemens TnI-Ultra, and 13% with Abbott-Architect cTnI. The diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was significantly greater for the sensitive cTn assays compared with the standard assay (AUC for Roche hs-cTnT, 0.94; Siemens cTnI-Ultra, 0.95; and Abbott-Architect cTnI, 0.95 vs. AUC for the standard assay, 0.90; P < 0.05 for comparisons). The best cut-offs for the sensitive cTn-assays determined by the ROC-curve in elderly patients differed clearly from those in younger patients. Furthermore, the prognostic value regarding 90-day mortality varied among the sensitive cTn assays. CONCLUSION: Sensitive cTn assays have high diagnostic accuracy also in the elderly. Mild elevations are common in elderly non-AMI patients, therefore the optimal cut-off levels are substantially higher in elderly as compared with younger patients. Furthermore, sensitive cTn assays yielded different prognostic value.

Características de los fallecimientos producidos en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario / Characteristics associated with emergency department deaths

Objetivos: Describir las características demográficas y asistenciales de los pacientes que fallecieron en nuestro servicio de urgencias hospitalario y analizar en qué puntos se podría mejorar la atención asistencial a este grupo de pacientes. Método: Estudio descriptivo de los pacientes que fallecieron en el servicio de urgencias entre el 1 de enero y el 31 de diciembre del 2006, excluyendo los pacientes fallecidos en las áreas de pediatría y ginecología. Se recogieron datos demográficos y clínicos, así como el tiempo de permanencia y la ubicación del paciente en el momento del óbito. Resultados: La tasa de mortalidad fue 0,2%. El perfil habitual fue el de un paciente de edad avanzada cuyo fallecimiento era esperado. La causa más frecuente de muerte fue la neoplasia en fase terminal y la mediana de permanencia en urgencias, de 6 horas. Únicamente se realizaron maniobras de reanimación cardiopulmonar en una cuarta parte de los pacientes. La prevalencia de pacientes con deterioro cognitivo fue del 32%.En la mayoría de ocasiones se consideró adecuada la ubicación del paciente en el momento de producirse su fallecimiento. Conclusiones: Dado el porcentaje no despreciable de pacientes afectos de una enfermedad terminal que fallecen en los servicios de urgencias se debería mejorar los circuitos de derivación hacia unidades más específicas. También es conveniente la elaboración de protocolos específicos para este grupo de pacientes (AU)

Objectives: To report clinical and demographic characteristics of patients who died in our hospital emergency department and to assess several aspects of medical care that could be improved. Methods: Descriptive study of patients who died in the Emergency Department between January 1st and December31st, 2006, excluding those patients who expired in the areas of pediatrics and gynecology. Demographic and clinical data, length of stay and location/placement of the patient at the time of death were recorded. Results: Mortality rate was 0.2%. The most common type of patient was an elderly person whose death was expected. The most frequent cause of death was end-stage malignant disease and the median length of stay was 6 hours. Only 25% of patients undergone cardiopulmonary resuscitation maneuvers. Prevalence of cognitive impairment was32%. Patient location at the time of death was considered correct in most cases. Conclusions: Given the significant ratio of patients with a terminal illness who die in the Emergency Departments, to enhance the transfer to more specific areas is mandatory. To design specific protocols for this group of patients is also desirable (AU)