Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody profiling in patients with Chagas disease treated with benznidazole assessed by genome phage display.

BACKGROUND: There have been significant improvements in Chagas disease therapy and it is now widely accepted that most patients with chronic disease might benefit from therapy. However, there are challenges to monitor drug efficacy and cure for these patients, which are important impediments for current and future therapies. Trypanosoma cruzi-PCR is highly variable while IgG seroconversion takes decades yielding variable results depending on the antigen(s) used for the assay. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the genomic phage display (gPhage) platform to perform a pairwise comparison of antigens and epitopes recognized by twenty individual patients with chronic Chagas disease before and after treatment with benznidazole. In total, we mapped 54,473 T. cruzi epitopes recognized by IgG from individual patients (N = 20) before benznidazole treatment. After treatment, the number of epitopes recognized by all patients was significantly smaller (21,254), a reduction consistent with a decrease in anti-T. cruzi antibodies. Most of these epitopes represent distinct fragments from the same protein and could, therefore, be grouped into 80 clusters of antigens. After three years of treatment with benznidazole, we observed a 64% reduction in the number of clusters of antigens recognized by patients (59 clusters before versus 21 clusters after treatment). The most abundant antigenic clusters recognized by patients correspond to the surface antigen CA-2 (B13) followed by the microtubule associated antigen, which highlights the value of these epitopes in Chagas disease diagnosis. Most importantly, quantitative pairwise comparison of gPhage data allowed for the prediction of patient response to treatment based on PCR status. PRINCIPAL FINDING: Here, we compiled a list of antigens and epitopes preferentially recognized by Chagas disease patients before and after benznidazole treatment. Next, we observed that gPhage data correlated with patient PCR-status and could, therefore, predict patient response to treatment. Moreover, gPhage results suggest that overall, independent of PCR status, treatment led to a reduction in the presence of T. cruzi-specific antibody levels and the number of antigens and epitopes recognized by these patients. CONCLUSION: The gPhage platform use of unbiased library of antigens, which is different from conventional serological assays that rely on predetermined antigens, is a contribution for the development of novel diagnostic tools for Chagas disease.

Development of a Novel Multiplex Immunoassay Multi-cruzi for the Serological Confirmation of Chagas Disease.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is due to the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, a protist disseminated by a Triatome vector. This disease is endemic to Latin America and considered by WHO as one of the 17 world's neglected diseases. In Europe and in North America, imported cases are also detected, due to migration of population outside of the endemic region. Diagnosis of T. cruzi infection is usually made indirectly by the detection of specific antibodies to T. cruzi antigens. Following initial diagnostic evaluation or screening test (qualifying or discarding blood donation), a confirmation test is performed for samples initially reactive. The test presented in this study aims at the confirmation/refutation of the infectious status of human blood samples and will permit taking appropriate clinical measures. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We designed a novel array of twelve antigens and printed these antigens onto 96-well plates. We tested 248 positive samples T. cruzi, 94 unscreened blood donors' samples from non-endemic area, 49 seronegative blood donors, 7 false-positive and 3 doubtful samples. The observed reactivities were analyzed to propose a decision-tree algorithm that correctly classifies all the samples, with the potential to discriminate false-positive results and sticky samples. We observed that antibodies levels (Sum of all antigens) was significantly higher for PCR positive than for PCR negative samples in all studied groups with Multi-cruzi. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The results described in this study indicate that the Multi-cruzi improves the serological confirmation of Chagas disease. Moreover the "sum of all antigens" detected by Multi-cruzi could reflect parasitemia level in patients-like PCR signals does-and could serve as an indicator of parasite clearance in longitudinal follow-ups. Validation of this assay is still required on an independent large collection of well characterized samples including typical false-reactive samples such as Leishmaniasis.