[length of ministerial tenure and public health achievements in Peru]. / Duración de la gestión ministerial y logros en salud en el Perú.

Short administration periods of a health ministry can jeopardize the implementation and effectiveness of state policies due to changes in management orientation, altering the natural learning process, or other factors. The aim of this article was to determine and compare the tenure length of the ministry of health in Peru, describe its characteristics and discuss its relationship with public health achievements. Between 1935 and 2021, the average tenure was of 13,7 months and the median was 11 months, the longest was found to be 67 months, by Constantino Carvallo, and the shortest was one day, by Javier Correa. The length of ministerial tenure in Peru has a wide range of variation (1 day up to 67 months), it is shorter compared to that of other countries and is decreasing since 2016. Although longer tenures would not be sufficient to guarantee health achievements, it might contribute to the sustainability of health-related actions and have a positive effect on long-term policies.

Los periodos breves en la gestión de un ministerio de salud pueden poner en riesgo la implementación y la efectividad de políticas de Estado por cambios en la orientación de la gestión, por un proceso natural de aprendizaje, o por otros factores. El propósito de este artículo fue determinar y comparar la duración de la gestión ministerial en salud en Perú, describir sus características y discutir su relación con los logros en salud pública. Entre 1935 y 2021, la media de duración de la gestión fue de 13,7 meses y la mediana fue de 11 meses, siendo la más extensa de 67 meses, de Constantino Carvallo, y la más breve de un día, de Javier Correa. La duración de la gestión ministerial en el Perú tiene un amplio rango de variación (1día hasta 67 meses), es menor comparada con la de otros países, y está disminuyendo desde el 2016. Si bien, una duración mayor a la encontrada no sería suficiente para garantizar los logros en salud, podría contribuir en el sostenimiento de las acciones de salud y tener un efecto positivo en las políticas de largo plazo.

Duración de la gestión ministerial y logros en salud en el Perú

Los periodos breves en la gestión de un ministerio de salud pueden poner en riesgo la implementación y la efectividad de políticas de Estado por cambios en la orientación de la gestión, por un proceso natural de aprendizaje, o por otros factores. El propósito de este artículo fue determinar y comparar la duración de la gestión ministerial en salud en Perú, describir sus características y discutir su relación con los logros en salud pública. Entre 1935 y 2021, la media de duración de la gestión fue de 13,7 meses y la mediana fue de 11 meses, siendo la más extensa de 67 meses, de Constantino Carvallo, y la más breve de un día, de Javier Correa. La duración de la gestión ministerial en el Perú tiene un amplio rango de variación (1día hasta 67 meses), es menor comparada con la de otros países, y está disminuyendo desde el 2016. Si bien, una duración mayor a la encontrada no sería suficiente para garantizar los logros en salud, podría contribuir en el sostenimiento de las acciones de salud y tener un efecto positivo en las políticas de largo plazo.

Short administration periods of a health ministry can jeopardize the implementation and effectiveness of state policies due to changes in management orientation, altering the natural learning process, or other factors. The aim of this article was to determine and compare the tenure length of the ministry of health in Peru, describe its characteristics and discuss its relationship with public health achievements. Between 1935 and 2021, the average tenure was of 13,7 months and the median was 11 months, the longest was found to be 67 months, by Constantino Carvallo, and the shortest was one day, by Javier Correa. The length of ministerial tenure in Peru has a wide range of variation (1 day up to 67 months), it is shorter compared to that of other countries and is decreasing since 2016. Although longer tenures would not be sufficient to guarantee health achievements, it might contribute to the sustainability of health-related actions and have a positive effect on long-term policies.

[Microcephaly in newborns in level II and III health facilities of the Ministry of Health of Peru]. / Microcefalia en recién nacidos en establecimientos de salud de nivel II y III del Ministerio de Salud de Perú.

OBJECTIVES.: To determine the ratio of microcephaly in newborns in level II and III health facilities of the Ministry of Health (MINSA) of Peru for the period 2005-2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: A secondary analysis of the databases of the Perinatal Information System was carried out during 2005-2013. Microcephaly was identified applying World Health Organization (WHO), Fenton, mixed (WHO-Fenton), and proportionality criteria. The ratios and indices of microcephaly were estimated per 10,000 live births (LB) by region and concordance was compared, using the WHO parameter as a reference. RESULTS.: The ratio of microcephaly during 2005 to 2013 was 3.4%, the average rate of microcephaly was 335 per 10,000 LBs according to the WHO criterion. The mixed parameter showed a substantial concordance (Kappa of 0.635), while the proportionality parameter showed a reasonable concordance (Kappa of 0.298). CONCLUSIONS.: The ratio of microcephaly in MINSA Level II and III health facilities was higher than that reported in other countries in the region before the appearance of Zika in the Americas. The frequency variations observed with those of other countries and among Peruvian regions could be explained by different factors, such as the technique for measuring head circumference, data capture, constitutional factors, and social determinants. We suggest standardizing measurements and their recording, harmonizing diagnostic criteria, and establishing health strategies to strengthen the epidemiological surveillance of the causes of microcephaly.

OBJETIVOS.: Determinar la proporción de microcefalia en recién nacidos en establecimientos de salud (EESS) de nivel II y III del Ministerio de Salud (MINSA) de Perú durante el periodo 2005-2013. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS.: Se realizó un análisis secundario de las bases de datos del Sistema Informático Perinatal durante 2005-2013. La identificación de microcefalia se realizó aplicando los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), de Fenton, mixto (OMS-Fenton) y de proporcionalidad. Se estimaron las proporciones y tasas de microcefalia por 10 000 nacidos vivos (NV) por regiones y se comparó la concordancia, considerando al parámetro de OMS como referencia. RESULTADOS.: La proporción de microcefalia durante el 2005 a 2013 fue de 3,4%, la tasa promedio de microcefalia fue de 335 por 10 000 NV según el criterio de OMS. El parámetro mixto mostró una concordancia sustancial (Kappa de 0,635), mientras que el de proporcionalidad mostró una concordancia razonable (Kappa de 0,298). CONCLUSIONES.: La proporción de microcefalia en EESS de nivel II y III del MINSA fue mayor a lo reportado en otros países de la región antes de la aparición del Zika en las Américas. Las variaciones de las frecuencias observadas con las de otros países y entre las regiones peruanas, se podrían explicar por diferentes factores, como la técnica de medición del perímetro cefálico, captura de datos, factores constitucionales y determinantes sociales. Sugerimos estandarizar las mediciones y su registro, uniformizar los criterios de diagnóstico y establecer las estrategias sanitarias para fortalecer la vigilancia epidemiológica de las causas de la microcefalia.

Microcefalia en recién nacidos en establecimientos de salud de nivel II y III del Ministerio de Salud de Perú / Microcephaly in newborns in level II and III health facilities of the Ministry of Health of Peru

RESUMEN Objetivos. Determinar la proporción de microcefalia en recién nacidos en establecimientos de salud (EESS) de nivel II y III del Ministerio de Salud (MINSA) de Perú durante el periodo 2005-2013. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un análisis secundario de las bases de datos del Sistema Informático Perinatal durante 2005-2013. La identificación de microcefalia se realizó aplicando los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), de Fenton, mixto (OMS-Fenton) y de proporcionalidad. Se estimaron las proporciones y tasas de microcefalia por 10 000 nacidos vivos (NV) por regiones y se comparó la concordancia, considerando al parámetro de OMS como referencia. Resultados. La proporción de microcefalia durante el 2005 a 2013 fue de 3,4%, la tasa promedio de microcefalia fue de 335 por 10 000 NV según el criterio de OMS. El parámetro mixto mostró una concordancia sustancial (Kappa de 0,635), mientras que el de proporcionalidad mostró una concordancia razonable (Kappa de 0,298). Conclusiones. La proporción de microcefalia en EESS de nivel II y III del MINSA fue mayor a lo reportado en otros países de la región antes de la aparición del Zika en las Américas. Las variaciones de las frecuencias observadas con las de otros países y entre las regiones peruanas, se podrían explicar por diferentes factores, como la técnica de medición del perímetro cefálico, captura de datos, factores constitucionales y determinantes sociales. Sugerimos estandarizar las mediciones y su registro, uniformizar los criterios de diagnóstico y establecer las estrategias sanitarias para fortalecer la vigilancia epidemiológica de las causas de la microcefalia.

ABSTRACT Objectives. To determine the ratio of microcephaly in newborns in level II and III health facilities of the Ministry of Health (MINSA) of Peru for the period 2005-2013. Materials and Methods. A secondary analysis of the databases of the Perinatal Information System was carried out during 2005-2013. Microcephaly was identified applying World Health Organization (WHO), Fenton, mixed (WHO-Fenton), and proportionality criteria. The ratios and indices of microcephaly were estimated per 10,000 live births (LB) by region and concordance was compared, using the WHO parameter as a reference. Results. The ratio of microcephaly during 2005 to 2013 was 3.4%, the average rate of microcephaly was 335 per 10,000 LBs according to the WHO criterion. The mixed parameter showed a substantial concordance (Kappa of 0.635), while the proportionality parameter showed a reasonable concordance (Kappa of 0.298). Conclusions. The ratio of microcephaly in MINSA Level II and III health facilities was higher than that reported in other countries in the region before the appearance of Zika in the Americas. The frequency variations observed with those of other countries and among Peruvian regions could be explained by different factors, such as the technique for measuring head circumference, data capture, constitutional factors, and social determinants. We suggest standardizing measurements and their recording, harmonizing diagnostic criteria, and establishing health strategies to strengthen the epidemiological surveillance of the causes of microcephaly.

[Contribution of Peru in initiatives to promote global health security]. / Contribución del Perú en las iniciativas para promover la seguridad sanitaria mundial.

This article describes the concept of global health security and its development over time. It emphasizes the need to control challenges against global health such as those produced by biologic agents both natural and intentional. It presents world initiatives that have developed during the last two decades and the contribution of Peru to the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) and the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. In order to accelerate the implementation of the International Health Regulations Peru has played an important role to accelerate the implementation of International Health Regulations (IHR), participating with a group of countries, World Health Organization (WHO), and GHSA in the creation of the Joint External Evaluation Tool (JEE).

Contribución del Perú en las iniciativas para promover la seguridad sanitaria mundial / Contribution of Peru in initiatives to promote global health security

RESUMEN El artículo describe el concepto de la seguridad sanitaria mundial, su evolución en el tiempo y discute la importancia de enfrentar los problemas que amenazan la salud global producidas por agentes biológicos de manera natural, accidental o intencional. Asimismo, presenta las iniciativas surgidas en las últimas dos décadas en el mundo, y el rol del Perú en el desarrollo de la Agenda para La Seguridad Sanitaria Mundial o Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) y la Alianza para las Evaluaciones Externas. Al respecto, el Perú ha cumplido un papel importante participando con un grupo de países, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y la GHSA en el proceso de desarrollo de un instrumento de evaluación externa conjunta denominado Joint External Evaluation Tool (JEE) con el objetivo último de acelerar la implementación del Reglamento Sanitario Internacional (RSI).

ABSTRACT This article describes the concept of global health security and its development over time. It emphasizes the need to control challenges against global health such as those produced by biologic agents both natural and intentional. It presents world initiatives that have developed during the last two decades and the contribution of Peru to the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) and the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. In order to accelerate the implementation of the International Health Regulations Peru has played an important role to accelerate the implementation of International Health Regulations (IHR), participating with a group of countries, World Health Organization (WHO), and GHSA in the creation of the Joint External Evaluation Tool (JEE).

An interactive internet-based continuing education course on sexually transmitted diseases for physicians and midwives in Peru.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians in developing countries have had limited access to continuing education (CE) outside major cities, and CE strategies have had limited impact on sustainable change in performance. New educational tools could improve CE accessibility and effectiveness. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The objective of this study was to evaluate an interactive Internet-based CE course on Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) management for clinicians in Peru. Participants included physicians and midwives in private practice drawn from a census of 10 Peruvian cities. The CE included a three-hour workshop for improving Internet skills, followed by a 22-hour online course on STD-syndrome-management, with subsequent educational support. The course used case-based clinical vignettes tailored to local STD problems. Knowledge and reported practices on STD management were assessed before, immediately after and at four months after completion of the course. Statistical analysis included parametric tests-linear regression multivariate analysis, paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA using SPSS 14.0. Of 1,071 eligible clinicians, 510 agreed to participate, as did an additional 132 public sector clinicians. Of these 642 participants, 619 (96.4%) completed the course, and 596 (96.3%) took the four-month follow-up evaluation. Physician and midwife scores improved from 64.2% correct answers on the pre-test to 77.9% correct on the four-month follow-up test (p<0.001). Most participants (95%) found the online course useful for their work needs. Self reported STD management practices did not change. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Among physicians and midwives in Peru, an Internet-based CE course was feasible, acceptable with high participation rates, and led to sustained improvement in knowledge at four months. Further studies are needed to test it as a model for improving the training of physicians, midwives, and other health care providers.

Non-monogamy and risk of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis among young adults and their cohabiting partners in Peru.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how patterns of non-monogamy influence prevalences of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in individuals and their cohabitating sex partners. METHODS A 2002 survey in 24 Peruvian cities enrolled men and women aged 18-29 years from random household samples. The cohabiting sex partner of each enrolee was also enrolled until approximately 100 couples per city were recruited. Men provided urine and women vaginal swabs or urine for molecular testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis; both genders provided blood for serological testing. RESULTS: Among 2099 females and 2052 males providing specimens and behavioural data, 18.2% of males and 2.5% of females reported non-monogamy during the past year. C trachomatis was detected in 121 females (5.8%) and 80 males (4.1%) and T vaginalis in 87 females (4.2%) and 26 males (1.3%). Multivariate analyses showed that C trachomatis infection in females was significantly associated with her male partner's non-monogamy (OR 2.02, CI 1.32 to 3.08) but not significantly with her own non-monogamy; T vaginalis was associated with her own non-monogamy (OR 3.11, CI 1.25 to 7.73) and with her partner's non-monogamy (OR 2.07, CI 1.26 to 3.42). For males, both C trachomatis (OR 2.17, CI 1.29 to 3.69) and T vaginalis (OR 2.49, CI 1.06 to 5.87) were significantly associated only with his own non-monogamy. CONCLUSIONS: Among cohabiting couples, male non-monogamy was common and was associated with C trachomatis and T vaginalis infection in himself and in his female partner, whereas female non-monogamy was reported infrequently and was significantly associated only with her own T vaginalis infection. Patterns of non-monogamy may guide public health interventions.

Pregnancy outcomes in women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based cohort study in Washington State.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the risk of preterm delivery, premature rupture of membranes, infant low birth weight and infant mortality, by a population-based retrospective cohort study using Washington State birth certificate data. METHODS: All women diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis infection (n = 851), noted with a check box on the birth certificate from 2003, and a randomly selected sample of women not diagnosed with C trachomatis (n = 3404) were identified. To assess the RR between chlamydia infection and pregnancy outcomes, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Women with chlamydia infection were younger, more likely to be non-white and had less years of education compared with women without chlamydia. Additionally, they were more likely to have inadequate prenatal care and coinfections with other sexually transmitted infections. After adjusting for age and education, chlamydia-infected women were at an increased risk of preterm delivery (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.99) and premature rupture of membranes (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.17) compared with non-infected women. However, no increased risk of infant death (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.80) or low birth weight (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.68) associated with chlamydia infection was observed. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that C trachomatis is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes, but not with infant death and low birth weight. Routine screening and opportune treatment for C trachomatis should be considered a necessary part of prenatal care to reduce these adverse pregnancy outcomes.