Epidemiology of surgery associated acute kidney injury (EPIS-AKI): a prospective international observational multi-center clinical study.

PURPOSE: The incidence, patient features, risk factors and outcomes of surgery-associated postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) across different countries and health care systems is unclear. METHODS: We conducted an international prospective, observational, multi-center study in 30 countries in patients undergoing major surgery (> 2-h duration and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit admission). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of PO-AKI within 72 h of surgery defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Secondary endpoints included PO-AKI severity and duration, use of renal replacement therapy (RRT), mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: We studied 10,568 patients and 1945 (18.4%) developed PO-AKI (1236 (63.5%) KDIGO stage 1500 (25.7%) KDIGO stage 2209 (10.7%) KDIGO stage 3). In 33.8% PO-AKI was persistent, and 170/1945 (8.7%) of patients with PO-AKI received RRT in the ICU. Patients with PO-AKI had greater ICU (6.3% vs. 0.7%) and hospital (8.6% vs. 1.4%) mortality, and longer ICU (median 2 (Q1-Q3, 1-3) days vs. 3 (Q1-Q3, 1-6) days) and hospital length of stay (median 14 (Q1-Q3, 9-24) days vs. 10 (Q1-Q3, 7-17) days). Risk factors for PO-AKI included older age, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease), type, duration and urgency of surgery as well as intraoperative vasopressors, and aminoglycosides administration. CONCLUSION: In a comprehensive multinational study, approximately one in five patients develop PO-AKI after major surgery. Increasing severity of PO-AKI is associated with a progressive increase in adverse outcomes. Our findings indicate that PO-AKI represents a significant burden for health care worldwide.

Individualized prediction for the occurrence of acute kidney injury during the first postoperative week following cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop individualized dynamic predictions for the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) during the first postoperative week after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single university teaching hospital in Madrid, Spain. PATIENTS: 3960 cases of major cardiac surgery performed from January 2002 to December 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, intraoperative risk factors, and repeated postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR). The primary outcome was AKI during the first postoperative week (stage 1 or higher of the Acute Kidney Injury Network). The dataset was split in two random samples (exploratory and validation). By combining time-to-event outcomes (AKI), and longitudinal data (repeated postoperative eGFR), we developed two different joint models for patients with normal and high baseline levels of serum creatinine (sCr). MAIN RESULTS: AKI occurred in 1105 patients (31%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.5-32.5) in the exploratory sample and 128 (32.2%, 95% CI 27.6-36.8) in the validation sample. For high baseline sCr patients, the risk of an AKI event was associated with the eGFR trajectory (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92), as well as with age, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. The normal baseline sCr model incorporated the same covariates and intraoperative transfusion. In this second model, the risk of an AKI event was associated with both the eGFR trajectory (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.91-0.92, for the current value of eGFR), and with its slope at that point (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99). So AKI risk decreased when the eGFR values increased, in accordance with the speed of this rise. Internal validation showed good discrimination and calibration of both joint models. The AUCs were always higher than 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: The joint models obtained combining both patient risk factors and postoperative eGFR values, are useful to predict individualized risk of cardiac surgery-associated AKI. Predictions can be updated as new information is gathered.

Early corticosteroids are associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) have a high fatality rate likely due to a dysregulated immune response. Corticosteroids could attenuate this inappropriate response, although there are still some concerns regarding its use, timing, and dose. METHODS: This is a nationwide, prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study in critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 admitted into Intensive Care Units (ICU) in Spain from 12th March to 29th June 2020. Using a multivariable Cox model with inverse probability weighting, we compared relevant outcomes between patients treated with early corticosteroids (before or within the first 48 h of ICU admission) with those who did not receive early corticosteroids (delayed group) or any corticosteroids at all (never group). Primary endpoint was ICU mortality. Secondary endpoints included 7-day mortality, ventilator-free days, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 691 patients out of 882 (78.3%) received corticosteroid during their hospital stay. Patients treated with early-corticosteroids (n = 485) had lower ICU mortality (30.3% vs. never 36.6% and delayed 44.2%) and lower 7-day mortality (7.2% vs. never 15.2%) compared to non-early treated patients. They also had higher number of ventilator-free days, less length of ICU stay, and less secondary infections than delayed treated patients. There were no differences in medical complications between groups. Of note, early use of moderate-to-high doses was associated with better outcomes than low dose regimens. CONCLUSION: Early use of corticosteroids in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is associated with lower mortality than no or delayed use, and fewer complications than delayed use.

Preoperative hydration with 0.9% normal saline to prevent acute kidney injury after major elective open abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is the second leading cause of hospital-acquired AKI. Although many preventive strategies have been tested, none of them has been totally effective. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether preoperative intravenous hydration with 0.9% normal saline could prevent postoperative AKI. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: University Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Spain, from June 2006 to February 2011. PATIENTS: Total 328 inpatients scheduled for major elective open abdominal surgery. INTERVENTION: 0.9% normal saline at a dose of 1.5 ml kg h for 12 h before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the overall postoperative AKI incidence during the first week after surgery defined by risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) and AKI network (AKIN) creatinine criteria. Secondary endpoints were the need for ICU admission, renal replacement therapy during the study period and adverse events and hospital mortality during hospital admission. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of AKI between groups: 4.7% in the normal saline group versus 5.0% in the control group and 11.4% in the 0.9% normal saline group versus 7.9% in the control group as assessed by the RIFLE and AKIN creatinine criteria, respectively. Absolute risk reductions (95% confidence interval) were -0.3% (-5.3 to 4.7%) for RIFLE and 3.5% (-10.2 to 3.6%) for AKIN. ICU admission after surgery was required in 44.5% of all participants. Only 2 (0.7%) patients required renal replacement therapy during the first week after surgery. The analysis of adverse events did not show statistically significant differences between the groups except for pain. In our population, 8 (2.4%) patients died during their hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Intravenous hydration with 0.9% normal saline before major open abdominal surgery was not effective in preventing postoperative AKI. No safety concerns were identified during the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Clinical trials.gov: NCT00953940 and EUDRA CT: 2005-004755-35.

Impact of a new definition of acute kidney injury based on creatinine kinetics in cardiac surgery patients: a comparison with the RIFLE classification.

OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse patient outcome. A new definition and staging system for AKI based on creatinine kinetics (CKs) has been proposed recently. Their proponents hypothesize that early absolute increases in serum creatinine (sCr) after kidney injury are superior to percentage increases, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aims of our study were to measure agreement between CK definition and the current consensus definition [risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage renal disease (RIFLE) system], and to compare time to diagnosis and prognostic value between both systems. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Agreement on AKI diagnosis by both classifications, time to diagnosis and prognostic value of both systems were compared in cardiac surgeries performed during a 6-year period (2002-2007) in a single centre. RESULTS: We found substantial agreement between both classifications (0.67). More patients were diagnosed with AKI by the CK definition than by RIFLE criteria both globally (28.2 vs 13.9%) and in every category (16.5 vs 8.4% for CK-1 vs RIFLE-R; 8.4 vs 3.6% for CK-2 vs RIFLE-I and 3.2 vs 2.0% for CK-3 vs RIFLE-F). Time to diagnosis was shorter for the CK definition (1.8 vs 2.5 days). Prognostic value in terms of information about in-hospital death and need for renal replacement was comparable between classifications. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgery, the CK definition and classification system showed substantial agreement with the current standard, was more sensitive than RIFLE and detected AKI earlier without loss of prognostic information.