Anatomic study of the lymph nodes of the mesorectum.

PURPOSE: Lymph node involvement is the most important prognostic factor when staging patients with colorectal cancer. The probability of detecting metastasis grows with the number of nodes examined. However, the number of nodes found in surgical specimens varies substantially. We have therefore determined the number and distribution of lymph nodes in the mesorectum by cadaveric dissection. METHODS: Twenty formalin-fixed cadaveric pelvises were dissected (13 males). The search for lymph nodes was performed in a systematic way, from the division of the superior rectal artery following the smallest visible branches to the level of the anorectal ring. RESULTS: A total of 168 lymph nodes were found in 20 mesorectal blocks, with a mean (standard deviation) number per specimen of 8.4 (4.45). Lymph node size ranged from 2 to 10 mm. Distribution of lymph nodes in mesorectum was as follows: 120 nodes (71.4 percent) were found around the branches of the superior rectal artery proximal to the peritoneal reflection, and 48 nodes (28.6 percent) were found distal to the peritoneal reflection. Fourteen specimens (70 percent) had lymph nodes at the division of the superior rectal artery. CONCLUSIONS: The mean number of lymph nodes found in the mesorectum distal to the superior rectal artery division was 8.4. Most of these lymph nodes were proximal to the peritoneal reflection. The range found in the number of lymph nodes per case should be considered for use in the formulation of guidelines in anatomicopathologic studies of surgical specimens obtained after mesorectal excision.

Evaluation of hematopoietic progenitors in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplants. CD34+ dose effect in marrow recovery. Retrospective analysis in 38 patients.

Our main goal was to evaluate the CD34+ dose in patients undergoing haemotopoietic stem celltransplantation and its results in terms of recovery of neutrophile and platelet counts, transfusion requirements, days of fever, antibiotic requirements and length of hospital stay. We studied 38 consecutive patients with haematological malignancies transplanted at our Department, from Feb. 96 through Sept. 98. The CD34+ cell quantification technique was standardized, using a modification of the ISAGHE 96 protocol. Patients were sorted into three groups according to the CD34+ count administered: a) between 3 and 5 x 10(6) cells/kg; b) between 5 and 10 x 10(6) cells/kg; c) > 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. As a secondary end point, results were assessed according to the number of aphereses required to arrive at the target count of CD34+, separating those patients that required only 1 or 2 aphereses versus those requiring 3 or more. Finally, an analysis was made of the results of transplantation comparing the different sources of stem cells (PBSC versus PBSC + B.M.). The best results were obtained in the group with cells between 3 and 5 x 10(6) CD34+. No statistically significant advantages were found in the group with cells over 5. The supra-optimal dose of more 10 x 10(6) would yield no additional beneficial results, while they can imply a greater infusion of residual tumor cells. The number of aphereses had no impact on engraftment. Results obtained with PBSC transplants were better than those with BM+PBSC in terms of neutrophile and platelet recovery. The number of CD34+ cells remains the main element in stem cell transplantation to evaluate the haematopoietic recovery after engraftment. Minimum and optimum yields remain unclear. Centers should establish their own optimal dose based on local methodologies and outcomes, maximizing costs and benefits.