Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature.

The accidental ingestion of a foreign body (FB) is a relatively common condition. In the present study, we report a peculiar case of rectal perforation, the first to our knowledge, caused by the inadvertent ingestion of a blister pill pack. The aim of this report is to illustrate the difficulties of the case from a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint as well as its unusual presentation. A 75-year-old woman, mentally impaired, arrived at our emergency department in critical condition. The computed tomography scan revealed a substantial abdominopelvic peritoneal effusion and free perigastric air. The patient was therefore submitted to an urgent exploratory laparotomy; a 2-cm long, full-thickness lesion was identified in the anterior distal part of the intraperitoneal rectum. Hence, we performed a Hartmann's procedure. Because of her critical condition, the patient was eventually transferred to the Intensive Care Unit, where she died after 10 d, showing no surgical complication. The ingestion of FBs is usually treated with observation or endoscopic removal. Less than 1% of FBs are likely to cause an intestinal perforation. The intestinal perforation resulting from the unintentional ingestion of an FB is often a difficult challenge when it comes to treatment, due to its late diagnosis and the patients' deteriorated clinical condition.

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of peritoneal malignancies in elderly patients with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an ongoing question due to the high associated surgical risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients, 11 (36.7%) older than 65 years, were submitted to CRS plus HIPEC. Criteria of patient eligibility were: peritoneal carcinomatosis of different origin, T3-4 gastric cancer, ECOG performance status ≤2, no extra-abdominal extension and no evidence of bowel obstruction. The median follow-up was 21.5 months (range: 1-63). The purpose of this retrospective study, was to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients, with special reference to postoperative morbidity, mortality and survival. RESULTS: We have recorded, in elderly patients, higher grade 3 and 4 morbidity and mortality, similar mean duration of cytoreductive surgery, of postoperative hospital stay, of median survival and of overall survival rates. CONCLUSION: Since there no statistical differences, in terms of morbidity and mortality, CRS with HIPEC may also be suitable for elderly patients.