Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is worse in BRCA mutation positive breast cancer patients prior to cancer treatment and premature menopause.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients with mutations in human tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population, as they are frequently exposed to cardiotoxic chemotherapy, anti-estrogen therapy, radiation, and/or oophorectomy for cancer-related treatment and prophylaxis. Animal and cell culture models suggest that BRCA mutations may play an independent role in heart failure. We sought to evaluate cardiac structure and function in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer compared to BRCA wildtype women with breast cancer. METHODS: We performed a 1:2 age- and hypertension-matched retrospective cohort study comparing BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (n = 38) versus BRCA wildtype controls (n = 76) with a new diagnosis of breast cancer. Echocardiographic data were obtained within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis and prior to chemotherapy, anti-estrogen therapy, radiation, or oophorectomy. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), a highly sensitive marker of LV function, was measured using QLab 15 (Philips Healthcare). RESULTS: In the total cohort of 114 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer, the median age was 45 ± 11 years and the prevalence of hypertension was 8%. There were no differences in traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors between cases and controls. BRCA carriers had lower LV-GLS (- 18.1% ± 4.7% vs. - 20.1% ± 3.8%, p = 0.02) and greater right atrial area (12.9 cm2 ± 2.7 cm2 vs. 11.8 cm2 ± 2.0 cm2, p = 0.04) compared to controls; however, both LV-GLS and right atrial area were within the normal range. Compared to controls, BRCA carriers had a trend toward worse LV posterior wall thickness (0.89 cm ± 0.15 cm vs. 0.83 cm ± 0.16 cm, p = 0.06) although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and prior to treatment, LV-GLS was worse in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers compared to those with BRCA wildtype. These findings suggest that BRCA mutations may be associated with subtle changes in cardiac function. Whether differences in GLS translate to increased cardiovascular risk in women with BRCA mutations needs to be further characterized.

Case report: a transcatheter aortic valve replacement failure secondary to COVID-19 infection.

Background: Valve thrombosis is a well-documented cause of bioprosthetic valve failure. Case reports have been published of prosthetic valve thrombosis secondary to COVID-19 infection. This is the first case report of COVID-19 associated valve thrombosis in a patient with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Case summary: A 90-year-old female with atrial fibrillation on therapeutic apixaban and status-post TAVR presented with COVID-19 infection and was found to have severe bioprosthetic valvular regurgitation with features suggestive of valve thrombosis. She underwent valve-in-valve TAVR with resolution of valvular dysfunction. Discussion: This case report contributes to a growing body of evidence describing the occurrence of thrombotic complications in patients with valve replacement and COVID-19 infection. Increased vigilance and continued investigation are warranted to better characterize thrombotic risk and to inform optimal antithrombotic strategies during COVID-19 infection.

Blood Type A1 Mismatch Does Not Affect Heart Transplant Outcomes at One Year.

There are subtypes within blood type A, termed non-A1, that have reduced expression of A antigen on cell surfaces. This can result in the development of anti-A1 antibodies. There is limited information regarding the impact of this in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. We conducted a single-center cohort study of 142 Type A HTx recipients in which we compared outcomes of a match group (an A1/O heart into an A1 recipient or a non-A1/O heart into a non-A1 recipient) with a mismatch group (an A1 heart into a non-A1 recipient or a non-A1 heart into an A1 recipient). At one year post-transplant, there were no differences between the groups in survival, freedom from non-fatal major adverse cardiovascular events, freedom from any treated rejection, or freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy. There was an increased hospital length of stay in the mismatch group (13.5 vs. 17.1 days, p = 0.04). Our study showed that A1 mismatch was not associated with worse outcomes at one year post-HTx.

The impact of the United Network of Organ Sharing allocation change on waitlist trajectories of inpatients listed with inotropic support: A single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation scheme prior to October 18, 2018, heart transplant (HTx) candidates with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS), or pulmonary artery (PA) catheter inotropic support all received Status 1A priority. In revised scheme, patients with PA catheter and inotropic support are Status 3 after those on ECMO (Status 1) or temporary MCS (Status 2). We examined the impact of the allocation change on HTx candidates listed Status 1A versus Status 3 at a high-volume transplant center. METHODS: Between January 2017 and January 2021, 75 patients were listed with a PA catheter and inotropic support prior to the allocation change (Era 1) and 48 were listed after (Era 2). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared for these 123 patients. RESULTS: Heart transplant (HTx) candidates in Era 2 had higher median inotrope doses at listing. There was no significant difference in inpatient wait list days (12 vs. 20 days, P = .15), transition to temporary MCS (33.3% vs. 22.7%, P = .15), or wait list mortality (6.3% vs. 4.0%, P = .68). There was also no significant difference in survival to transplantation (91.7% vs. 94.7%, P = .71). There were no differences in post-transplant outcomes including 1-year survival (88.6% vs. 93.0%, P = .38). CONCLUSION: At a high-volume transplant center, the UNOS allocation change did not result in increased wait list time, use of temporary MCS, or mortality on the waitlist or post-transplant for candidates on inotropic support with continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Using a Macro Lens for Anterior Segment Imaging in Rural Panama.

Background: Visual impairment, specifically anterior segment pathology, presents a significant burden of disease in the world. Introduction: Inexpensive tools are necessary to improve eye health of residents in developing countries where care is difficult to access. Our study aimed at determining whether a $5 macro lens attached to a smartphone camera is an effective anterior segment imaging method for screening diseases. Materials and Methods: Fifty four (n = 54) patients had anterior segment imaging performed by using an Easy Macro lens and an iPhone. Imaging was performed at the Floating Doctors' mobile clinic sites in Panama. Images were sent back and graded by two board-certified ophthalmologists using a modified version of the FOTO-ED scale. Statistical analysis was performed by using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare grades between the two imaging modalities. Results: There was no significant difference in overall clinical utility of images obtained by the iPhone versus Easy Macro lens. The iPhone was significantly superior in imaging of the lens and conjunctiva, whereas the Easy Macro lens was superior in regards to the anterior chamber, iris, and lens. Discussion: The imaging modality that best captures pathology is dependent on what part of the anterior segment is being examined. An imaging protocol with a pair of images, one from a smartphone and one from a macro lens, would have significant clinical utility. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates how minimally trained users can deliver effective eye screening via a telemedicine-based approach in a resource-deprived setting. Future directions would be to develop a telemedicine protocol and determine whether it improves clinically measurable outcomes in patients.