Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 26(27): 3929-3937, 2020 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32774067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Some patients with hepatolithiasis cannot tolerate surgery due to severe cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities, or cannot be endoscopically treated because of altered gastrointestinal anatomies. AIM: To propose a modified percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation procedure, and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this modality. METHODS: Data from 21 consecutive patients who underwent modified percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation with hepatolithiasis were retrospectively analyzed. Using auxiliary devices, intrahepatic bile duct stones were pushed into the common bile duct and expelled into the duodenum with an inflated balloon catheter. The outcomes recorded included success rate, procedure time, hospital stay, causes of failure, and procedure-related complications. Patients with possible long-term complications were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: Intrahepatic bile duct stones were successfully removed in 20 (95.23%) patients. Mean procedure time was 65.8 ± 5.3 min. Mean hospital stay was 10.7 ± 1.5 d. No pancreatitis, gastrointestinal, or biliary duct perforation was observed. All patients were followed up for 2 years, and there was no evidence of reflux cholangitis or calculi recurrence. CONCLUSION: Modified percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation was feasible and safe with a small number of patients with hepatolithiasis, and may be a treatment option in patients with severe comorbidities or in patients in whom endoscopic procedure was not successful.


Assuntos
Cateterismo , Ducto Colédoco , Endoscopia , Litíase , Hepatopatias , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Dilatação , Feminino , Humanos , Litíase/terapia , Hepatopatias/terapia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 14(7): 1476-1481, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30589026

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: 125I seed implantation has recently become an effective, safe, and feasible treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer in China. Gemcitabine (GEM), superior to fluorouracil, has been widely proved as effective chemotherapy for many solid tumors and become the standard treatment for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. The study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of 125I and GEM on pancreatic carcinoma cells (PANC-1) cells and explore the underlying molecular basis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: PANC-1 cells were treated with 125I continuously at a low dose of radiation, combined with or without sensitizing concentration of GEM. The clonogenic capacity, cellular proliferation, cell cycle distribution, apoptosis, and molecular pathways of the cells following these treatments were analyzed in vitro. RESULTS: The cell growth could be significantly inhibited after the treatment with GEM or 125I alone, while the inhibition effects would be greater with combination therapy than either monotherapy (72 h, C vs. GEM, t = 16.59, P < 0.01; C vs. 125I, t = 9.808, P < 0.05; C vs. 125I + GEM, t = 17.87, P < 0.01; 125I vs. 125I+GEM, t = 8.191, P < 0.05). GEM increased radiation-induced apoptosis (4 Gy, 125I vs. 125I+GEM, t = 10.43, P < 0.01) and induced the arrest of G1. Caspase-3 expression and the Bax/Bcl2 ratio were lower in cells receiving combination treatment than that of in cells treated with 125I or GEM alone. CONCLUSION: The combined treatment of 125I and GEM-induced stronger anti-proliferation effect than single-treatment, due to the cell cycle arrest and more cellular apoptosis in PANC-1 cells. The increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio may lead to enhanced apoptosis.


Assuntos
Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Apoptose/efeitos da radiação , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular/efeitos da radiação , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Radioisótopos do Iodo/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Proliferação de Células/efeitos da radiação , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos da radiação , Células Cultivadas , Desoxicitidina/farmacologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Gencitabina
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 24(33): 3799-3805, 2018 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30197485

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of an innovative percutaneous transhepatic extraction and balloon dilation (PTEBD) technique for clearance of gallbladder stones in patients with concomitant stones in the common bile duct (CBD). METHODS: The data from 17 consecutive patients who underwent PTEBD for clearance of gallbladder stones were retrospectively analyzed. After removal of the CBD stones by percutaneous transhepatic balloon dilation (PTBD), the gallbladder stones were extracted to the CBD and pushed into the duodenum with a balloon after dilation of the sphincter of Oddi. Large stones were fragmented using a metallic basket. The patients were monitored for immediate adverse events including hemorrhage, perforation, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. During the two-year follow-up, they were monitored for stone recurrence, reflux cholangitis, and other long-term adverse events. RESULTS: Gallbladder stones were successfully removed in 16 (94.1%) patients. PTEBD was repeated in one patient. The mean hospitalization duration was 15.9 ± 2.2 d. Biliary duct infection and hemorrhage occurred in one (5.9%) patient. No severe adverse events, including pancreatitis or perforation of the gastrointestinal or biliary tract occurred. Neither gallbladder stone recurrence nor refluxing cholangitis had occurred two years after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Sequential PTBD and PTEBD are safe and effective for patients with simultaneous gallbladder and CBD stones. These techniques provide a new therapeutic approach for certain subgroups of patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy or surgery is not appropriate.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/métodos , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Dilatação/métodos , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/instrumentação , Colangiografia , Coledocolitíase/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Dilatação/efeitos adversos , Dilatação/instrumentação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA