Effect of fatigue on quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the chain mediating role of resilience and self-efficacy.

OBJECTIVES: Exploring the effect of resilience and self-efficacy in mediating the chain between fatigue and quality of life(QOL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: From June 2022 to November 2022, 423 RA patients were chosen by a convenience sample method from two tertiary care facilities in Chengdu, Sichuan Province. General Information Questionnaire, Bristol Multidimensional Scale of Fatigue in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, SF-12 Health Survey Short Form, Chinese version of the ten-item psychological Resilience Scale, and Chinese-language Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, an 8-element version, were among the questionnaires used. RESULTS: In the physical component summary( PCS), self-efficacy, psychological resilience, and self-efficacy were all significantly mediated by fatigue (total effect mediated 8.88%). In the mental component summary (MCS), fatigue (total effect mediated 10.79%), self-efficacy (total effect mediated 8.99%), psychological resilience, and self-efficacy (total effect mediated 2.01%) were all significantly mediated by fatigue. CONCLUSION: Fatigue in RA patients can affect the quality of life both directly and indirectly through the mediating effects of psychological resilience, self-efficacy, and the chain mediating effect of psychological resilience-self-efficacy.

Latent class analysis of psychological resilience and influencing factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the latent class of psychological resilience in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and examine the factors influencing various latent types. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design was used in this study. A total of 480 patients with RA were enrolled from two tertiary care institutions in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, between May and November 2023, using the convenience sample approach. The General Information Questionnaire, CD-RISC-10, SSRS, ASES-8, and BRAF-MDQ were used to analyze the latent classes of psychological resilience in the respondents, and the factors influencing the latent classes were explored using one-way analysis of variance, analysis of variance, and multi-categorical logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 423 valid questionnaires were returned, indicating an 88.13% effective return rate. A latent class analysis revealed that RA patients were divided into three classes of psychological resilience: low-level (20.3%), moderate-level (31.0%), and high-level (48.7%) psychological resilience. A multi-categorical logistic regression analysis found that social support, self-efficacy, weariness, age, work status, and somatic pain all significantly influenced psychological resilience in RA patients. CONCLUSION: Three classes of RA patients' psychological resilience were identified by this study, and these classes were strongly correlated with individual treatment components. It is crucial to take into account the psychological resiliency of female RA patients who do not have a job. In order to improve psychological resilience, healthcare staff should first increase their comprehension of treat-to-target. Furthermore, people with RA may become more psychologically resilient if they receive more social support. Key Points • Preliminary research found that psychological resilience in RA patients was associated with three latent classes. • In RA patients, psychological resilience was significantly influenced by self-efficacy, fatigue, age, work status, physical pain, and social support. • The fundamental goal of bolstering RA patients' psychological resilience is to reaffirm their place in the treatment process, for example, by improving patient compliance and achieving treat-to-target earlier.

Nurse-supported care versus rheumatologist-led care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at high disease activity: A retrospective study of two Chinese centers.

The European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis advised the involvement of clinical nurses for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. However, The European League Against Rheumatism recommendations are difficult to apply to Chinese institutes. In China, the rheumatology nursing service is not widely adopted because the feasibility and quality of rheumatology nursing service have not been confirmed in the Chinese population by the Chinese authorities. The objectives of the study were to compare 2.5 years clinical outcomes of patients of rheumatoid arthritis (6 months history) with disease activity score 28-joint count with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) > 5.1 who received nurse-supported care against those of patients who received rheumatologist-led care. Patients received 30 minutes/day and 6 times/week nurse-supported care (NC cohort, n = 127) or Patients had received 20 minutes session at every 3 months of conventional outpatient-based rheumatologist-led care (n = 131). Both types of care have involved the history of patients, care regarding effects and adverse effects of pharmacological treatments, patients education, overall well-being, everyday life, counseling, clarifications, and rehabilitation. Additionally, there were a cohort in which patients did not receive any nontreatment care (NN cohort, n = 141). All patients have definite depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scale Chinese version score ≥ 11) before nontreatment interventions. At 2.5 years of treatments with or without nontreatment interventions (EL) DAS28-CRP, depression, and anxiety scores of patients of the NC cohort were decreased as compared to their before any type of nontreatment interventions conditions and those of patients of the RC and NN cohorts at EL (P < .001 for all). At EL numbers of patients with moderate disease activity, (DAS28-CRP score: 3.2-5.1) and borderline depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scales Chinese version score: 8-10) were greater in the NC cohort than those of the RC and NN cohorts (P < .001 for all). Outpatient care satisfaction scores of patients of the NC cohort were higher than those of the RC [23 (27-17) vs 17 (21-14)] and NN [23 (7-17) vs 15 [18-12]) cohorts (P < .001 for both). Physiological and psychological conditions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with DAS28-CRP > 5.1 are required to improve. Nurse-supported care is superior nontreatment compared to rheumatologist-led care in rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy: Stage 5).