Therapeutic Strategies in HCC: Radiation Modalities.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comply with an advanced disease and are not eligible for radical therapy. In this distressed scenario new treatment options hold great promise; among them transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial metabolic radiotherapy (TAMR) have shown efficacy in terms of both tumor shrinking and survival. External radiation therapy (RTx) by using novel three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy has also been used for HCC patients with encouraging results while its role had been limited in the past for the low tolerance of surrounding healthy liver. The rationale of TAMR derives from the idea of delivering exceptional radiation dose locally to the tumor, with cell killing intent, while preserving normal liver from undue exposition and minimizing systemic irradiation. Since the therapeutic efficacy of TACE is being continuously disputed, the TAMR with (131)I Lipiodol or (90)Y microspheres has gained consideration providing adequate therapeutic responses regardless of few toxicities. The implementation of novel radioisotopes and technological innovations in the field of RTx constitutes an intriguing field of research with important translational aspects. Moreover, the combination of different therapeutic approaches including chemotherapy offers captivating perspectives. We present the role of the radiation-based therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who are not entitled for radical treatment.

F-18 FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients with unexplained CEA rise after surgical curative resection for colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the role of quantitative assessment by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [F-18]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unexplained carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) rise after surgical curative resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty asymptomatic patients (mean age, 64 ± 12 years) with previous CRC and current serum CEA levels >5 ng/ml underwent [F-18] FDG PET/CT 13 ± 3 months after complete surgical resection. The SUVmax was registered on anastomosis and peri-anastomotic tissue lesions, if present. The patients were followed for 24 ± 9 months thereafter. Re-intervention, evidence of newly discovered distant metastases, and death were recognized as main events and constituted surrogate end points. The receiver-operator-curve (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate the optimal SUVmax cut-off to predict patients at high risk of main events. PET/CT results were then related to disease outcome (overall survival; OS). RESULTS: The mean SUVmax at the anastomotic site was 6.2 ± 3 (range 2.6-15). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, the anastomotic SUVmax remained as the only significant contributor to the prediction of the events (p = 0.004; OR 1.97). The ROC analysis recognized that the optimal threshold of SUVmax to differentiate patients was 5.7. A worse OS was observed in patients presenting with a SUVmax greater than 5.7 as compared to those having lesser (median survival: 16 vs. 31 months; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative assessment by SUVmax on [F-18]FDG PET/CT may be helpful in patients presenting with unexplained CEA rise after curative resection of CRC, by identifying those at risk of main events.

18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Localization and Characterization of Lesions in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

AIM: The aim was to compare the imaging findings of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET and integrated PET/CT in patients with primary, recurrent or metastatic ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 women with ovarian cancer were evaluated. All patients had a integrated PET/CT scan. Localization, infiltration and uptake intensity of [(18)F]FDG were evaluated on PET and PET/CT. The certainty of localisation and characterisation was scored on a 3 point scale (L1 definite localisation; L2 probable localisation; L3 uncertain localisation; C1 benign; C2 equivocal; C3 malignant). RESULTS: PET scored as L1 54 lesions (44%), as L2 51 (42%), and as L3 17 (14%). On the other hand, PET/CT scored as L1 120 lesions (98%), as L2 2 (2%), and none as L3. Thus PET/CT allowed a better localization in 54% of lesions. Moreover, PET scored as C1 25 lesions (20%), as C2 62 (51%), and as C3 35 (29%). On the other hand, PET/CT scored as C1 57 lesions (47%), as C2 13 (11%), and as C3 52 (42%). Thus PET/CT allowed a sensible reduction in the number of equivocal lesions (40%). Even when patients were subgrouped on the basis of clinical stage of the disease, PET/CT was capable of better definition of the lesions either for localization and for characterization. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ovarian cancer, PET/CT allows better anatomical localisation of pathologic uptake providing high accuracy for staging and restaging of ovarian cancer when compared with PET alone.