Early and late morbidity of local excision after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Local excision (LE) after chemoradiotherapy is a new option in low rectal cancer, but morbidity has never been compared prospectively with total mesorectal excision (TME). Early and late morbidity were compared in patients treated either by LE or TME after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. METHOD: This was a post-hoc analysis from a randomized trial. Patients with clinical T2/T3 low rectal cancer with good response to the chemoradiotherapy and having either LE, LE with eventual completion TME, or TME were considered. Early (1 month) and late (2 years) morbidities were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: There were no deaths following surgery in any of the three groups. Early surgical morbidity (20 per cent LE versus 36 per cent TME versus 43 per cent completion TME, P = 0.025) and late surgical morbidity (4 per cent versus 33 per cent versus 57 per cent, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the LE group than in the TME or the completion TME group. of LE, was associated with the lowest rate of early (10 versus 18 versus 21 per cent, P = 0.217) and late medical morbidities (0 versus 7 versus 7 per cent, P = 0.154), although this did not represent a significant difference between the groups. The severity of overall morbidity was significantly lower at 2 years after LE compared with TME or completion TME (4 versus 28 versus 43 per cent grade 3-5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rate of surgical complications after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the LE group was half that of TME group at 1 month and 10 times lower at 2 years. LE is a safe approach for organ preservation and should be considered as an alternative to watch-and-wait in complete clinical responders and to TME in subcomplete responders.

Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy, by its minimally invasive nature, has revolutionized digestive and particularly colorectal surgery by decreasing post-operative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In this trial, we aim to assess whether low pressure in laparoscopic colonic surgery (7 mm Hg instead of 12 mm Hg) could further reduce pain, analgesic consumption, and morbidity, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PAROS trial is a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We aim to recruit 138 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a low-pressure group (7 mm Hg) or a standard-pressure group (12 mm Hg). The primary outcome will be a comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will compare post-operative pain, consumption of analgesics, morbidity within 30 days, technical and oncological quality of the surgical procedure, time to passage of flatus and stool, and ambulation. All adverse events will be recorded. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research received the approval from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and was the subject of information to the ANSM. This search is saved in the ID-RCB database under registration number 2018-A03028-47. This research is retrospectively registered January 23, 2019, at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ed under the name "LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery (PAROS)". This trial is ongoing.

National multicentric evaluation of quality of pathology reports for rectal cancer in France in 2016.

The quality of pathologic assessment of rectal cancer specimens is crucial for treatment efficiency and survival. The Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) recommends evaluating the quality of the pathology report in routine practice using three quality indicators (QIs): the number of lymph nodes (LNs) analyzed (≥ 12), the rate of venous invasion (VI ≥ 30%), and peritoneal involvement (pT4a ≥ 10%). In this study, we evaluated the three QIs of the French national pathology reports and compared them with British guidelines and assessed the influence of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on QIs. From January 1 to December 31, 2016, all pathology reports for rectal adenocarcinoma were collected from French departments. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy included long-course radiotherapy with concomitant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. A total of 983 rectal cancer pathology reports were evaluated. A median of 15 LNs were analyzed and 81% of centers had ≥ 12 LNs. The rate of VI was 30% and 41% of centers had ≥ 30% VI. The rate of pT4a was 4% and 18% of centers reported ≥ 10% pT4a. None of the centers reached the threshold for the three QIs. All three QIs were lower after radiochemotherapy compared to surgery alone. In conclusion, in French routine practice, the values of two of the three QIs (LNs analyzed and VI) were globally in line with RCP guidelines. However, the rate of pT4a was very low, particularly after radiochemotherapy, suggesting its low value in rectal cancer.

Individualizing surgical treatment based on tumour response following neoadjuvant therapy in T4 primary rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer involving at least one adjacent organ (mrT4b) requires multi-visceral resection to achieve clear resection margin (R0). Performing pelvic compartment preservation according to the tumour response has not been considered. This study assesses the impact of changing the surgical strategy according to tumour response in rectal cancer mrT4b. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic T4b rectal cancer at two tertiary referral centres between 2008 and 2013 were grouped as "Responders" ypT0-3abNx versus "Non-responders" ypT3cd-4Nx and divided into three surgical procedures: total mesorectal excision (TME), extended-TME (eTME) and beyond-TME (b-TME). End-points were circumferential resection margin, postoperative morbidity, definitive stoma formation, 3-years local recurrence (3y-LR) and 3-years disease-free survival (3y-DFS) according to both tumours' response and surgical procedures. RESULTS: Among 883 patients with rectal cancer, 101 were included. Responders had a higher rate of induction chemotherapy (59.7% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.04). Morbidity and definitive stoma formation were significantly higher in Non-responders. R0 was not impacted by either the tumour response or the surgical procedures. The 3y-LR was lower in Responders (14%) compared to Non Responders (32%) (HR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.02-2.59; p = 0.041), and was two-fold higher in e-TME compared to b-TME in Non-responders, whereas no difference was found in Responders. The 3y-DFS was higher in Responders irrespective to the surgery (71% vs. 47%; p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In Responders, TME or e-TME are technically and oncollogically feasible and should be considered in preferrence to b-TME. In Non-responders, allowing for high rates of morbidity and local recurrence in patients with e-TME, b-TME procedures should be preferred.

French current management and oncological results of locally recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a significant worldwide variation in practice regarding the criteria for operative intervention and overall management in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). A survival benefit has been described for patients with clear resection margins in patients undergoing surgery for LRRC which is seen as an important surgical quality indicator. METHODS: A prospective French national database was established in 2008 which recorded procedures undertaken for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Overall and Disease-Free Survival (OS, DFS) were assessed retrospectively. We report the variability and the heterogeneity of LRRC management in France as well as 5-year oncological outcomes. RESULTS: In this national report, 104 questionnaires were completed at 29 French surgical centres with a high variability of cases-loaded. Patients had preoperative treatment in 86% of cases. Surgical procedures included APER (36%), LAR (25%), Hartmann's procedure (21%) and pelvic exenterations (15.5%). Four patients had a low sacrectomy (S4/S5). There were no postoperative deaths and overall morbidity was 41%. R0 was achieved in 60%, R1 and R2 in 29% and 11%, respectively. R0 resection resulted in a 5-year OS of 35% compared to 12% and 0% for respectively R1 and R2 (OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.4-2.98; p < 0.001). OS was similar between R2 and non-resected patients (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 0.58-3.76; p = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: Our data is in accordance with the literature except the rate of extended resection procedures. This underlines the selective character of operative indications for LRRC in France as well as the care variability and the absence of optimal clinical pathway regarding these patients.

Association Between Infliximab Trough Levels and the Occurrence of Paradoxical Manifestations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents have dramatically improved the prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However, despite their good safety profile, use of these agents may lead to paradoxical manifestations involving skin or joints. Pathogenesis of such side effects is poorly understood and may involve anti-TNF pharmacokinetics. The aim of the present study was to look for an association between infliximab trough levels [ITL] and cutaneous [CPM] or rheumatological [RPM] paradoxical manifestations. METHODS: IBD patients receiving infliximab as maintenance therapy were included in a cross-sectional prospective monocentre study. At inclusion, patients had an ITL measurement [LISA-TRACKER®, Biomedical Diagnostics BMD] and were assessed for paradoxical manifestations: a CPM was defined by new onset or exacerbation of pre-existing psoriasis lesions during IFX therapy, and an RPM by new onset of severe poly-arthralgia during IFX therapy. RESULTS: Among the 121 patients included [69 female; median age: 38.9 years; 92 with Crohn's disease], 7% had CPM and 8% RPM. Median ITL values were 5.87 [range: 0.52-19.53] µg/ml in patients with CPM and 1.90 [0.00-13.5] µg/ml in those with RPM, as compared respectively with 5.12 [0.00-49.12] µg/ml in patients without CPM [p = 0.56] and 5.57 [0.00-49.12] µg/ml in those without RPM [p = 0.058]. No prognostic factor was associated with CPM. The single factor associated with RPM was elevated antinuclear antibodies. CONCLUSION: ITL were not elevated in IBD patients developing cutaneous or rheumatological paradoxical manifestations when receiving IFX as maintenance therapy. As suggested by the high level of antinuclear antibodies, RPM could be related to an induced autoimmune disorder.

Impact of mucosal healing on long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab: a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal healing can be achieved with infliximab (IFX). AIM: To assess the impact of mucosal healing on long-term outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) when treated with infliximab (IFX) beyond 1 year. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients with refractory UC receiving maintenance treatment with IFX in five French referral centres were analysed retrospectively. Only patients who had endoscopic evaluation between 6 and 52 weeks following IFX initiation were included. According to their Mayo endoscopic sub-score, patients were categorised into mucosal healing (sub-score: 0-1) and no mucosal healing (2-3). Outcome measures were colectomy and IFX failure defined by drug withdrawal due to secondary failure among primary responders. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients (30 women; median age: 38 years), 30 (48%) achieved mucosal healing. The median follow-up duration was 27 (3-79) months. Colectomy-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were, respectively, 100%, 96% and 96% in patients with mucosal healing. The corresponding figures were, respectively, 80%, 65% and 65% in patients without mucosal healing (P = 0.004). By multivariate analysis, mucosal healing was the only factor associated with colectomy-free survival, with an odds ratio of 18.01 (95%CI: 1.58-204.92). IFX failure-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were, respectively, 76%, 69% and 64% in patients with mucosal healing, and 44%, 25% and 21% in those without mucosal healing (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with refractory UC who achieved mucosal healing after IFX initiation had better long-term outcomes, with significantly less colectomy and less IFX failure.

Prediction of Crohn's disease relapse with faecal calprotectin in infliximab responders: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Faecal calprotectin is a reliable tool for predicting Crohn's disease (CD) relapse in patients with sustained remission. Prediction of relapse with faecal calprotectin has been less studied in patients with severe CD treated with anti-TNF. AIM: To identify an association between faecal calprotectin concentration and CD clinical relapse in patients achieving remission with infliximab (IFX). METHODS: From February 2007 to October 2008, consecutive patients with refractory luminal CD were prospectively included when they received three IFX infusions (5mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6) followed by maintenance with an immunomodulator alone. Faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at entry and at week 14 (w14). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (43W; median age: 30.4years) were included, and 50 (77%) were in clinical remission off steroids at w14; twenty-three of fifty (46%) experienced CD clinical relapse during the first year of follow-up. Median faecal calprotectin level at w14 was similar in patients with and without CD clinical relapse (200 and 150µg/g respectively). When considering two suggested faecal calprotectin cut-offs to predict CD relapse, sensitivities and specificities were 61% and 48% for 130µg/g, respectively, and 43% and 57% for 250µg/g. Neither faecal calprotectin nor CRP at baseline and at w14 could predict relapse even when CD location subgroup analysis was considered. CONCLUSION: In patients responding to an infliximab induction regimen, faecal calprotectin measurement at w14 cannot predict Crohn's disease clinical relapse at 1year.

Mucosal healing with methotrexate in Crohn's disease: a prospective comparative study with azathioprine and infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal healing has become a new therapeutic goal in Crohn's disease and can be achieved with azathioprine (AZA) or biologics. Methotrexate (MTX) is an effective drug for both the induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. However, mucosal healing with MTX has been poorly investigated. AIM: To assess the mucosal healing rate in patients with Crohn's disease with clinical response to MTX as compared with AZA or infliximab (IFX). METHODS: From October 2007 to May 2009, consecutive patients with Crohn's disease were prospectively enrolled into a single-centre study when they met the following criteria: previous identification of mucosal ulcerations with ileo-colonoscopy, clinical remission within at least 3 months with MTX, AZA or IFX monotherapy, usual indication for colonoscopy in Crohn's disease (dysplasia/cancer screening, suspected stenosis) excluding assessment for mucosal healing. Mucosal healing was defined as absence of mucosal ulceration in all segments. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with Crohn's disease (38 female; median age: 42 years) were included: 18 receiving MTX, 18 AZA and 15 IFX. Mucosal healing was achieved in 2/18 (11%) with MTX, in 9/18 (50%) with AZA (P =0.011 vs. MTX) and in 9/15 (60%) with IFX (P=0.008 vs. MTX). CONCLUSION: In patients with Crohn's disease in sustained clinical remission, mucosal healing is less frequently achieved with MTX as compared with AZA or IFX.

Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: No long-term advantage of the laparoscopic approach has been demonstrated in colorectal surgery. This study compared the risk of incisional hernia between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2004, patients who had restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer by laparoscopy were compared with those treated by open surgery. Follow-up was prospective, and incisional hernia was considered to be any abdominal wound dehiscence occurring at the midline, extraction, trocar or ileostomy site. Cumulative risks of hernia were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. RESULTS: Some 155 patients had a laparoscopic and 165 an open procedure. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, body mass index, tumour stage, loop ileostomy and morbidity. The conversion rate was 20.6 per cent. The rate of incisional hernia in all patients was 11.4 per cent at 1 year, 21.1 per cent at 2 years and 23.7 per cent at 5 years. The rate of hernia at 5 years was significantly lower in the laparoscopic than in the open group (13.0 versus 33.0 per cent; P < 0.001). The rate of hernia due specifically to the laparoscopic procedure (extraction and trocar sites) was ten times less than that after a primary or secondary open procedure (2.1 versus 16.1-33.1 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach decreases the risk of long-term incisional hernia following restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The benefit is most apparent in patients without conversion or postoperative complication.

[Interest of radiotherapy of rectal cancer with synchronous metastases]. / Intérêt de la radiothérapie dans le traitement de la tumeur primitive rectale lorsque sont associées des métastases synchrones.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus about the treatment of rectal tumour when there are synchronous metastases. The interest of radiotherapy is debated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with rectal tumour and synchronous metastases were treated with radiotherapy first between September 1994 and December 2004. We analysed the tolerance, local control, resecability, overall survival of such a therapeutic strategy. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 30 months. Twenty-four tumors were resecable for both the primary site and the metastases. Thirteen were unresecable at the time of diagnosis. Thirty-three patients were treated with radiochemotherapy, ten with radiotherapy alone. Eighty-six decimal five percent of them had no pelvic symptom six weeks after the treatment. Twenty-one rectal tumours were finally resected. The disease progressed in six cases during the radiotherapy. Surgery of the metastases was possible for 12 patients with tumour initially resecable. CONCLUSION: Radiochemotherapy is a "tolerable" treatment, in spite of more frequent urinary or digestive side-effects. But, if there is no surgery, palliative effect of radiotherapy is limited.

Determinants of gastro-oesophageal reflux perception in patients with persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Approximately 20% of patients have persistent symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the determinants of reflux perception in patients on PPI therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 patients with typical gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) despite double-dose PPIs (twice daily) were included in this study. Ambulatory 24 h pH-impedance studies were performed in all patients. The characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic reflux episodes were compared. Symptoms were considered globally and separately for heartburn and regurgitation. RESULTS: A total of 1273 reflux episodes were detected including 243 (19.1%) acidic, 1018 (80.0%) weakly acidic and 12 (0.9%) weakly alkaline reflux episodes. Overall, 312 (24.5%) reflux episodes were symptomatic. The only factor associated with reflux perception was high proximal extent (p = 0.037). Compared with regurgitation, reflux episodes associated with heartburn were more frequently pure liquid (p = 0.009) and acidic (p = 0.027), had a lower nadir pH (p<0.001), were more frequently preceded by acid reflux episodes (p<0.001) and had a longer reflux bolus clearance time (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High proximal extent of the refluxate is the only factor associated with reflux perception in patients on double-dose PPI. However, compared with regurgitation, composition of the refluxate, sensitisation of the oesophagus by preceding acid exposure and delayed bolus clearance appear to play a role in heartburn perception.

[Atrial natriuretic factor: one of the mechanisms of action of the phlebology bath at Barbotan]. / Le facteur natriurétique atrial: un des mécanismes d'action du bain de phlébologie à Barbotan.

UNLABELLED: The effect of thermal baths on oedema of the lower limbs might be explained by physical mechanisms of hydrostatic pressure resulting from the use of a deep bath and a centripetal underwater jet, by which the veins and lymph ducts are drained every day. The purpose of this experiment is to demonstrate the existence of hormonal mechanisms which would account for the diuretic effect of thermal baths. One of the effects observed with hydrotherapy is the physiological diuresis that follows each bath, this diuresis would appear to depend at least in part on the atrial natriuretic factor (ANF). The criteria by which assessment can be made essentially biological: ANF level and its biological effects on blood and urine; aldosterone level; plasma renin activity (PRA); creatinine clearance; hematocrit; proteinemia; and blood and urine electrolyte balance. The inclusion criteria are: subjects selected at random and willing cooperate. The criteria for exclusion are disease states which modify ANF kinesis: congestive heart failure, cardiac rhythm disorders, decompensated cirrhosis of liver, obesity, treatment antihypertensive drugs. METHODS: Thirty patients were put through the same experimental sequence, as follows: emptying of the bladder and ingestion of 200 cc of water; seated rest fort 30 mn, after which (to): blood sample; urine sample; ingestion of 200 cc of water; deep bath for 20 mn, i.e. the basic hydro treatment in phlebology at Barbotan. The deep bath is specific to Barbotan and the patient is subjected to maximum immersion in water at a mesothermal temperature of 34.5 degrees C, followed by (t1): blood and urine sample; ingestion of 200 cc of water; supine rest for 90 mn, followed by (t2): blood and urine sample. RESULTS: Data from twenty-eight patients were usable. In this protocol, we use variance analysis with repeated measurements and a 95% confidence limit. The mean value of the principal parameters studies are set out in the following table; these value are accompanied by the degree of significance of the modification at (t1) and (t2). Our experimentation with thirty patients showed that the big thermal bath at Barbotan produces a highly significant increase in ANF secretion, resulting in the diuresis observed after the use of the bath. The antagonist effect of AFN on the renin--angiotensin-aldosterone system was corroborated: we found decreased aldosterone, PRA and creatinine clearance, and increased diuresis and natriuresis. The renal and cardiovascular effects observed after extended immersion in the Barbotan bath (increased diuresis, tachycardia and hypotension, transitory venous vasoplegia and ephemeral vasodilatation of the surface capillaries) are the result of increased ANF secretion. [formula: see text] Supine rest immediately after the bath is essential. This sustains the enhanced ANF and thus reinforces its renal effects, while reducing adverse cardiovascular effects such as the orthostatic hypotension and venous vasoplegia that are normally observed after use of the bath. Moreover, by reducing venular and lymphatic pressure, clinostatism facilitate interstitial to intravascular tissue fluid exchanges and thus helps to drain oedema from the legs. It is striking to note that the hydrotherapy prescribed at Barbotan les Thermes has always included the three most potent factors for ANF release: deep immersion in the big bath, immediate supine rest, and walking. Physiological diuresis has thus been induced empirically as an essential part of the treatment of lower limb phlebopathies.