Compact thermal imager: a flight demonstration of infrared technology for Earth observations.

During 2019, an infrared camera, the compact thermal imager (CTI), recorded 15 million images of the Earth from the International Space Station. CTI is based on strained-layer superlattice (SLS) detector technology. The camera covered the spectral range from 3 to 11 µm in two spectral channels, 3.3-5.4 and 7.8-10.7 µm. Individual image frames were 26×21km2 projected on the ground, with 82 m pixel resolution. A frame time of 2.54 s created continuous image swaths with a 13% along-track image overlap. Upper limits determined on the ground and in flight for the electronic offset, read noise, and dark current demonstrated the stability of the SLS detector and camera over many months. Temperature calibration was established using a combination of preflight and in-flight measurements. A narrowband approximation of temperature as a function of photon counts produced an analytic relationship covering a temperature range of 0°-400°C. Examples of CTI images illustrate temperature retrievals over sea ice, urban and agricultural areas, desert, and wildfires.

An EORTC-ECSG phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine is an active drug in the treatment of lung and breast cancers and has a favorable toxicity profile. Many clinical trials have demonstrated its antitumor activity in other tumor types including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, previously untreated by chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2/week i.v. by short-duration infusion on an out-patient basis. Doses were adjusted according to tolerance. RESULTS: Two complete and seven partial responses were observed among 56 evaluable patients, yielding a response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-28%). The overall response rate of all eligible patients (63) was 14%. The responses were seen in recurrent tumors, lymph nodes and in lung metastases, and their median duration was 19 weeks (12-63). The main toxicity, severe and reversible neutropenia (grade 3-4) occurred in 53% of the 69 evaluable (for toxicity) patients. Twelve patients developed severe bronchopulmonary infections, which caused two early deaths. Constipation was observed in 31 patients (45%). Other gastrointestinal toxicities, asthenia, acute pain syndrome and peripheral sensory neuropathy, were mild to moderate. The median number of treatments was seven cycles and the median relative dose intensity of vinorelbine was 85% (25.5 mg/m2/week). CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine is an active drug, with acceptable toxicity, in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, at the dose and schedule administered in the present study. Further evaluation in association with other agents and/or radiotherapy is warranted.

[Secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas]. / Les lymphomes non hodgkiniens secondaires.

Developing a secondary non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) more than 12 months after treatment for first cancer, is uncommon. Secondary NHL occurs sometimes after chronic lymphatic leukemia or Hodgkin's disease. The 20 years cumulative incidence rate is 3-5% after Hodgkin's disease. Secondary NHL seems less frequent after any childhood cancer. Pertinent features of secondary NHL are a high percentage of patients with extranodal tumor sites (brain, digestive tractus), high grade histological subtype, phenotype B and advanced stage. But for identical histological type and stage, the prognosis of secondary NHL seems the same than de novo NHL ones. The incidence of secondary NHL is associated to individual parameters (age), first cancer (chronic lympho proliferative syndrome, Hodgkin's disease) and previous chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Immunodeficiency is probably the most important cofactor for the subsequent development of secondary NHL. However, secondary NHL differs from NHL of immunosuppressed patients (HIV+, posttransplant) because brain lymphoma are less frequent and immunodeficiency disorders unknown. Secondary NHL are also different of therapy-associated leukemias in the late occurrence after the first treatment and in the questionable role of cytotoxic agents given for the treatment of the first cancer.

[Hormonal replacement therapy and breast cancer]. / Traitement hormonal substitutif de la ménopause et cancer du sein.

Hormonal replacement therapy is prescribed more and more frequently to increase quality of life and decrease the symptomatic and organic consequences of the menopausal status. The different studies which analyzed the risk of breast cancer for women under hormonal replacement therapy show opposed conclusion. We reviewed articles published between 1980 and 1997 to try to conclude about the consequences of the action of this treatment in the risk of breast cancer from the characteristic of the hormonal replacement therapy and from known risk of breast cancer. Hormonal replacement therapy increases the incidence of breast cancer. Risk increase with the treatment duration and a low estrogen dose would be sufficient to palliate to the hormonal lack (< 0.625 mg/j). The risk of breast cancer becomes the same that this of women without hormonal replacement treatment when treatment interrupted. The association of estrogen and progestin should not be protective of breast cancer. But the hormonal treatment seems to be synergistic for the risk of breast cancer with late menopause, late age at the birth of first child. Hormonal treatment could increase the estrogenic period and should increased the risk of breast cancer in women with late age at menarche, late age at menopause and late age at first child. It should not increase the risk of breast cancer in women with benign breast disease, with family history of breast cancer and in nulliparous women. For women who undergone a bilateral oophorectomy before hormonal replacement treatment the risk would be the same than for women with natural menopause and without hormonal replacement treatment. However breast cancer should be diagnosed earlier in women with hormonal treatment because mammographies were made more frequently. Overall survival should not different between the women who were under hormonal therapy and theses were not.

A double-blind, multicentre comparison of intravenous dolasetron mesilate and metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

The potent serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonists are new highly selective agents for the prevention and control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting that have been shown to be comparable to or more effective than traditional metoclopramide regimens. This study was designed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron and metoclopramide in chemotherapy-naive and non-naive cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of single i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate salt (1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (7 mg/kg) in 226 patients for the prevention of acute emesis and nausea associated with the administration of high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 24 h. Complete responses were achieved by 57%, 48%, and 35% of patients given dolasetron mesilate 1.8 mg/kg (P = 0.0009 vs metoclopramide), dolasetron mesilate 1.2 mg/kg (P = 0.0058 vs metoclopramide), and metoclopramide, respectively. Overall, dolasetron was significantly more effective than metoclopramide for time to first emetic episode, nausea, patient satisfaction, and investigator global assessment of efficacy. Males, chemotherapy-naive patients, and alcoholics had higher response rates. Dolasetron was well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate headache most commonly reported. Twelve percent of patients receiving metoclopramide reported extrapyramidal symptoms compared with 0% of patients receiving dolasetron. In conclusion, dolasetron mesilate was effective for the prevention of CINV with high-dose cisplatin. Single i.v. doses of dolasetron mesilate were more effective than 7 mg/kg metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In addition, 1.8 mg/kg dolasetron mesilate consistently produced the highest response rates and appears to be the most effective dose for further clinical development.

[Predictive value of the hemogram for myelotoxicity induced by the association of carboplatin-fluorouracil on the 4th day of the therapeutic regimen]. / Valeur prédictive de l'hémogramme du 4e jour pour la myélotoxicité induite par l'association carboplatine-5-fluorouracile.

The aim of this study was to determine the value of haematological counts at the 4th day of a chemotherapy cycle, in order to foresee neutro and/or thrombocytopenia during the same chemotherapy cycle. One hundred and ten cycles of chemotherapeutic regimens with carboplatin (400 mg/m2, dl) and 5-fluorouracile (1 g/m2/d, by iv continuous infusion for 96 hours) every 3 weeks, were analyzed for 42 patients with locally advanced but non metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, without prior chemotherapy. Lymphocyte counts were significantly decreased at the 4th day but normalized at the 8th day (P < 10(-6)). Decreases of lymphocyte and neutrophil counts at the 4th day were significantly correlated to grade > 2 neutropenia. The positive predictive value of lymphocyte or neutrophil counts is about 50% for some cut-off values but not high enough, with the schedule of chemotherapy in our study, to justify the systematic prophylactic therapy with haematopoietic growth factors.

A double-blind, randomised comparison of the anti-emetic efficacy of two intravenous doses of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron in patients receiving high dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

This multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of single intravenous doses of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron in the prevention of acute emesis and nausea due to high-dose (> or = 80 mg/m2) cisplatin. Single intravenous doses of 1.8 or 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate or 3 mg of granisetron hydrochloride were administered in a volume of 50 ml over a 5-min period, beginning 30 min prior to cisplatin (> or = 80 mg/m2) administration. The number and timing of emetic episodes, time to administration of escape anti-emetic medication, severity of nausea by visual analogue scale (VAS), and safety were monitored for 24 h after the start of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Investigators' evaluations of overall efficacy and patients' satisfaction with therapy were recorded at the end of the 24-h study period. Of the 474 patients evaluable for efficacy, complete responses were achieved by 54, 47 and 48% of patients given dolasetron mesilate 1.8 mg/kg, dolasetron mesilate 2.4 mg/kg and granisetron, respectively. Statistically, treatment groups had comparable complete and complete plus major responses, times to first emesis, and use of escape medication; patient maximum nausea severity and treatment satisfaction ratings; and physician nausea severity and overall efficacy assessments. For the majority of efficacy endpoints, 1.8 mg/kg dolasetron mesilate produced numerically superior responses compared with the 2.4 mg/kg dose. Gender and prior chemotherapy were significant predictors of complete response; males and chemotherapy-naive patients had higher responses. The overall incidences of adverse events were comparable among the treatment groups; headache and diarrhoea were most common. In conclusion, 1.8 and 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate and granisetron (3 mg) were equally effective in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In addition, because no additional benefit was observed with 2.4 mg/kg of dolasetron mesilate and numerically greater responses were observed with the 1.8 mg/kg dose, the lower dose of 1.8 mg/kg is optimal for further clinical development.

[Hypercalcemia and squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory-digestive tracts. Incidence and prognosis]. / Hypercalcémie et carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures. Fréquence et valeur pronostique.

We performed a retrospective analysis on all head and neck cancers with hypercalcemia seen between January 1988 and June 1993 at the Centre Oscar-Lambret, cancer center of northern France. Hypercalcemia, non albumin-corrected, higher than 2.60 mmol/l was observed in 173 of 3,394 consecutive patients (5%). Median age of patients with hypercalcemia was 53 years and 97% of these patients were males. All patients with hypercalcemia had advanced or recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN); 31 of them were not pretreated. There was no significant difference in histology between patients with or without hypercalcemia, but hypercalcemia was most commonly associated with lesions of the oropharynx (p = 0.00001). The median of calcemia was of 2.83 mmol/l (2.61-4.70). Gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms respectively occurred in 24% and in 14% of patients and bone metastases in 25% of patients. Median survival after the first determination of hypercalcemia was of 7 weeks (0-128) for the overall group of 173 patients and of 12 weeks (1-128) for those 31 patients with hypercalcemia at initial diagnosis. Prognosis associated factors were: efficacy of antitumour treatment, performance status and hypercalcemia superior or not to 3 mmol/l. We concluded that hypercalcemia in head and neck cancer is usually a late manifestation associated with advanced, recurrent and/or metastatic disease and carries a poor prognosis. The prolongation of survival can be obtained in some patients if an effective antitumour treatment is feasible.

[Randomized placebo trial of myeloprotection with goralatide in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts or esophagus, treated with a carboplatin-fluorouracil combination]. / Essai randomisé avec placebo de myéloprotection par le goralatide des patients présentant un carcinome épidermoïde des voies aérodigestives supérieures ou de l'oesophage, traités par l'association carboplatine-5 fluorouracile.

Eighty-four patients with locally advanced, non metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck or esophagus, were included in a multicentric double-blind randomized trial, comparing goralatide (12.5 or 62.5 micrograms/kg/day, d1-d4) to placebo, associated with carboplatin (400 mg/m2, d1) and 5-fluorouracile (1 g/m2/d continuous IV over 96 hours). Haematological toxicity was analysed on 221 cycles of chemotherapy. All but one patient were evaluable because of early death without haematological toxicity. No significant difference was observed for mean nadir of leukocytes, granulocytes, platelets counts and hemoglobin level. Duration of haematological toxicity was no significantly different for the two groups of patients. Anemia and lymphopenia were more frequent in the goralatide treated patients. Clinical and biological tolerability of goralatide was excellent.

Randomized phase III trial of edatrexate versus methotrexate in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group study.

PURPOSE: To compared the response rates and the toxicity of the new antifolate edatrexate (EDX) with that of methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCC) and to compare the durations of response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-three patients with SCC were randomized to receive either EDX or MTX as a weekly intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Doses of EDX were initially 80 mg/m2/wk, but because of the toxicity, this was later reduced to 70 mg/m2/wk. MTX was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/wk throughout. In both arms, two dose increments of 10% were scheduled in case of no toxicity. RESULTS: Of 264 eligible patients, 131 were treated with EDX and 133 with MTX. There were five treatment-related deaths: four on EDX and one on MTX. Overall, toxicity was similar in both arms; however, stomatitis, skin toxicity, and hair loss were more pronounced on the EDX arm. The overall response rate was 21% (six complete responses [CRs] and 21 partial responses [PRs]) for EDX and 16% (nine CRs and 12 PRs) for MTX (P = .392). Responses were mainly seen in patients with locoregional disease. Tumors that originated from the hypopharynx responded poorly in comparison to tumors from other sites. The median duration of response was 6.1 months for EDX and 6.4 months for MTX (log-rank P = .262). There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival. The median survival duration was 6 months on both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both EDX and MTX are moderately active against SCC. In this large phase III study, response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appeared to be similar for both antifolates. However, EDX had more side effects than MTX and therefore cannot be recommended for routine palliative treatment of patients with SCC.

A clinical screening cooperative group phase II evaluation of lobaplatin (ASTA D-19466) in advanced head and neck cancer.

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lobaplatin, a new platinum compound, given at the dose of 50 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus every 4 weeks, in 49 patients with advanced and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). One complete and 2 partial responses were observed in 43 eligible patients for an overall response rate of 7% (95% confidence interval: 1-19%). The duration of responses was 11, 16 and 32 weeks. Toxicities of WHO grade > or = 3 were hematologic: thrombocytopenia in 26%, granulocytopenia in 12% and anemia in 12% of patients. There was no therapy-related death. Nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and paresthesia were mild and rare. In conclusion, lobaplatin was well tolerated, but its efficacy in advanced SCCHN at the presented dose and schedule, was marginal.

[Hormone replacement therapy in menopause and cancers]. / Traitements substitutifs de la ménopause et cancers.

The long term outcome analysis of estrogen replacement therapy shows that the carcinologic risk is far more inferior than the osseous and cardiovascular risks of which the prevention is ensured by estrogen. In the same way, the quality of life improvement during the years following menopause is important. For a female population without personal risk of breast cancer, the substitutive hormone therapy offers numerous advantages which have been for a long time refused to women with previously treated breast cancer. Any dogmatic behaviour is presently justified. On the contrary, the hormonal replacement therapy requires beforehand an analysis as exact as possible of the risks of its prescription as of its non-prescription and a responsibility taking shared between the physician and his patient. The progresses of the molecular biology and the expansion of randomized trials will permit with no doubt to recognize more easily for each patient, even the one who would have been previously treated for a breast cancer, the respective impact of carcinologic, cardiovascular and osseous risks.

[Resistance and resistances]. / Résistance et résistances.

Drug resistance is a frequent clinical event, induced by more than one mechanism. It is intrinsic and/or acquired by tumoral cell population. But the failure of chemotherapy is also associated to intratumoral drug incorporation and altered drug and/or cell metabolism. Prevention of drug resistance needs integration of pharmacokinetic, biochemical and pathological characteristics of tumoral cell population.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone. RESULTS: The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

Acute antiemetic efficacy and safety of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 antagonist, in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. European Dolasetron Study Group.

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF), a new serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist was administered to 164 cancer patients naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, in single, rising doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg i.v. 15 minutes prior to an infusion of cisplatin. The severity of nausea and number of episodes of emesis were recorded during the 24-hour period following cisplatin administration. There were significant differences between the dose groups, sex, and naive and non-naive patients. There were also significant dolasetron dose-dependent differences for no emesis (p = .01), less than 3 emetic episodes (p = .01), time-to-onset of nausea (p = .04), and time-to-onset of emesis (p = .003). The severity of symptoms was greater for females, for patients with previous chemotherapy, and with shorter duration of cisplatin infusion. Adjustment for these variables and the study center reduced the associations between the dose of dolasetron mesylate and the outcome variables. The principal adverse events were headache (11%) and diarrhea (6%). Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated; a single dose of 40 or 50 mg controlled acute nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in the majority, in particular in chemotherapy-naive and male patients. In conclusion, 50 mg and a larger dose merit study in controlled trials with stratification for sex and previous chemotherapy.