Validation of Baveno VI Criteria for Screening and Surveillance of Esophageal Varices in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis and a Sustained Response to Antiviral Therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of patients with cirrhosis includes endoscopic screening and surveillance to detect esophageal varices (EV) and prevent bleeding. However, the Baveno VI guidelines recommend avoiding endoscopies for patients with liver stiffness measurements below 20 kPa and platelet counts above 150,000 (favorable Baveno VI status) and endoscopic assessment of patients with higher levels of liver stiffness and platelet counts (unfavorable Baveno VI status). We aimed to validate the Baveno VI guidelines, evaluating outcomes of patients in the ANRS-CO12 CirVir cohort with compensated cirrhosis associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with or without a sustained response to antiviral therapy. METHODS: We performed an ancillary study using data from 891 patients in the ANRS CO12 CirVir cohort, treated at 35 centers in France, with HCV or HBV infection and biopsy-proven cirrhosis, Child-Pugh A scores, no previous complications, and no hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent an endoscopic procedure and had interpretable liver stiffness measurements and platelet counts. Progression of portal hypertension (PHT) was defined as the onset of varices needing treatment (VNT) or PHT-related bleeding. An sustained response to antiviral therapy was defined as undetectable level of HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction assay (<50 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR) or an undetectable level of HBV DNA. The primary aims were to validate the Baveno VI guidelines for screening and surveillance of EV in patients with compensated cirrhosis and to study the effects of an SVR on the progression of PHT. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients achieved an SVR (22.4%) (94 patients with HCV infection, 98 patients with HBV infection, and 8 patients with both); 80 of these patients had favorable Baveno VI status and none had VNT. Progression of PHT was studied in 548 patients; during a follow-up period of 61.2 months (interquartile range, 39.5-80.6 months), 105 of these patients (19.1%) had progression of PHT. Lack of an SVR and grade 1 EV were independently associated with progression of PHT. At the time of PHT progression, all patients had unfavorable Baveno VI status. Achieving favorable Baveno VI status after an SVR was associated with the absence of PHT progression. Favorable Baveno VI status and SVR were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from a large cohort of patients with HBV- or HCV-associated cirrhosis in France, we validated the Baveno VI guidelines on screening and surveillance of PHT, even for patients who achieved a sustained response to antiviral therapy.

Prognostic value of viral eradication for major adverse cardiovascular events in hepatitis C cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to examine the role of a sustained virological response (SVR) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with the following criteria were enrolled in 35 French centers: (1) biopsy-proven HCV cirrhosis; (2) Child-Pugh A; (3) positive viremia; and (4) no prior liver complication, and then prospectively followed. All patients received HCV treatment after inclusion. MACEs included stroke, myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, cardiac arrest, and cardiovascular death. SVR, defined as negative viremia 12 weeks posttreatment, was considered as a time-dependent covariate, and its effect on MACE occurrence was assessed. The median follow up was 57.5 months, ending in December 2015. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 878 (7.1%) patients presented a total of 79 MACEs. The main predictive baseline factors of MACEs were Asian ethnic origin, history of MACEs, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, current smoking, low serum albumin level, high total bilirubin level, and low platelet count. In multivariate analysis, SVR was associated with a decreased risk of MACEs (hazard ratio=0.35, 95% CI 0.09-0.97, P=.044), whereas Asian ethnic origin, arterial hypertension, smoking, and low serum albumin level remained predictive of MACE occurrence. The 5-year survival rate was 60.1% versus 87.5% in patients who did versus those who did not present a MACE (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis, Asian ethnic origin, arterial hypertension, smoking, and low serum albumin are independent predictive factors of cardiovascular events, whereas an SVR is associated with a decreased rate of cardiovascular events.

Bacterial infection in compensated viral cirrhosis impairs 5-year survival (ANRS CO12 CirVir prospective cohort).

OBJECTIVE: To assess incidence and prognostic significance of bacterial infections (BIs) occurring in compensated viral cirrhosis. DESIGN: This prospective study involved 35 French centres. Inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven HCV or HBV cirrhosis, Child-Pugh A and no previous hepatic complications. Cumulative incidence (CumI) of events was estimated in a competing risks framework. RESULTS: 1672 patients were enrolled (HCV 1323, HBV 318, HCV-HBV 31). During a median follow-up of 43 months, 234 BIs occurred in 171 patients (5 year CumI: 12.9%), among whom 14.6% had septic shock. Main localisations included the urinary tract (27.4%), lung (25.2%) and peritoneum (10.7%) (other, 86 (36.7%)). Most BIs occurred as a first event prior to liver decompensation (n=140, 81.8%) and were community-acquired (CA, 84.2%). The risk of BI was higher in patients with HCV than in patients with HBV (5 year CumI: 15.2% vs 5.5%, p=0.0008). Digestive localisation, concomitant interferon-based treatment, isolation of resistant bacteria and non-CA BIs were associated with lowest probability of resolution. The occurrence of a first BI impaired survival in patients infected with HCV (5 year survival: 60.2% vs 90.4%, p<0.001) and patients infected with HBV (5 year survival: 69.2% vs 97.6%, p<0.001). BIs represented the third cause of death (14.1%) after liver failure and liver cancer. BI risk factors comprised older age, lower albumin, proton pump inhibitor intake and absence of virological eradication/control. CONCLUSION: BI mostly occurs as a first complication and represents a turning point in the course of compensated viral cirrhosis. Its occurrence impacts long-term prognosis and may define a subgroup of patients in whom adaptation of management is warranted.

Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients With Cirrhosis Reduces Risk of Liver and Non-Liver Complications.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed a prospective study to investigate the effects of a sustained viral response (SVR) on outcomes of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: We collected data from 1323 patients included in the prospective Agence Nationale pour la Recherche sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales (ANRS) viral cirrhosis (CirVir) cohort, recruited from 35 clinical centers in France from 2006 through 2012. All patients had HCV infection and biopsy-proven cirrhosis, were Child-Pugh class A, and had no prior liver complications. All patients received anti-HCV treatment before or after inclusion (with interferon then with direct antiviral agents) and underwent an ultrasound examination every 6 months, as well as endoscopic evaluations. SVR was considered as a time-dependent covariate; its effect on outcome was assessed by the Cox proportional hazard regression method. We used a propensity score to minimize confounding by indication of treatment and capacity to achieve SVR. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 58.2 months, 668 patients (50.5%) achieved SVR. SVR was associated with a decreased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR] compared with patients without an SVR, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.43; P < .001) and hepatic decompensation (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.17-0.39; P < .001). Patients with SVRs also had a lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69; P = .001) and bacterial infections (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.68; P < .001). Metabolic features were associated with a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with SVRs, but not in patients with viremia. SVR affected overall mortality (HR, 0.27 compared with patients without SVR; 95% CI, 0.18-0.42; P < .001) and death from liver-related and non-liver-related causes. Similar results were obtained in a propensity score-matched population. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed a reduction in critical events, liver-related or not, in a prospective study of patients with HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis included in the CirVir cohort who achieved an SVR. We found an SVR to reduce overall mortality and risk of death from liver-related and non-liver-related causes. A longer follow-up evaluation is required to accurately describe and assess specific risk factors for complications in this population.

Nomogram for individualized prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (ANRS CO12 CirVir).

UNLABELLED: The aim of this work was to develop an individualized score for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with hepatitis C (HCV)-compensated cirrhosis. Among 1,323 patients with HCV cirrhosis enrolled in the French prospective ANRS CO12 CirVir cohort, 720 and 360 were randomly assigned to training and validation sets, respectively. Cox's multivariate model was used to predict HCC, after which a nomogram was computed to assess individualized risk. During follow-up (median, 51.0 months), 103 and 39 patients developed HCC in the training and validation sets, respectively. Five variables were independently associated with occurrence of HCC: age > 50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16; 3.25; P = 0.012); past excessive alcohol intake (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02; 2.36; P = 0.041); low platelet count (<100 Giga/mm(3) : HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.62; 4.51; P < 0.001; [100; 150] Giga/mm(3) : HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.10; 3.18; P = 0.021); gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase above the upper limit of normal (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.11; 3.47; P = 0.021); and absence of a sustained virological response during follow-up (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.67; 5.48; P < 0.001). An 11-point risk score was derived from the training cohort and validated in the validation set. Based on this score, the population was stratified into three groups, in which HCC development gradually increased, from 0% to 30.1% at 5 years for patients with the lowest (≤3) and highest (≥8) scores (P < 0.001). Using this score, a nomogram was built enabling individualized prediction of HCC occurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years. CONCLUSION: This HCC score can accurately predict HCC at an individual level in French patients with HCV cirrhosis. (Hepatology 2016;64:1136-1147).

Complications and competing risks of death in compensated viral cirrhosis (ANRS CO12 CirVir prospective cohort).

UNLABELLED: Various critical events, liver related or not, occur in patients with compensated cirrhosis, but their respective burden remains to be prospectively assessed. The aim of this prospective cohort study involving 35 French centers was to capture the whole spectrum of complications occurring in compensated viral cirrhosis (VC) using competing risks analyses. Inclusion criteria were: histologically proven cirrhosis resulting from hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV); Child-Pugh A; and no previous hepatic complications. The cohort was considered as a multistate disease model, cumulative incidences (CumIs) of events were estimated in a competing risks framework. A total of 1,654 patients were enrolled from 2006 to 2012 (HCV, 1,308; HBV, 315; HCV-HBV, 31). During a median follow-up of 34 months, at least one liver nodule was detected in 271 patients, confirmed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 128 (4-year cumI: 10.5%) and cholangiocarcinoma in 3. HCC incidence was higher in HCV (4-year cumI: 11.4% vs. 7.4%; P = 0.05). HCC fulfilled Milan criteria in 79.3%, leading to curative treatment in 70.4%. Liver decompensation occurred more frequently in HCV patients (4-year cumI: 10.8% vs. 3.6%; P = 0.0004). Virological eradication/control was achieved in 34.1% of HCV and 88.6% of HBV patients and was associated with a marked decrease in HCC, decompensation, and bacterial infection incidences. Survival was shorter in HCV patients (4-year cumI: 91.6% vs. 97.2%; P = 0.0002). Death (n = 102; missing data: 6) was attributed to liver disease in 48 (47%; liver cancer: n = 18; miscellaneous, n = 30) and extrahepatic causes in 48 (47%; bacterial infection: n = 13; extrahepatic cancers: n = 10; cardiovascular events: n = 5; miscellaneous, n = 20). CONCLUSION: After 3 years of follow-up, extrahepatic events still explained half of deaths in patients with compensated VC. A strong decrease in complications was linked to virological eradication/control.

Which therapeutic option for hepatitis C virus genotype 1?

OBJECTIVE: Sofosbuvir and simeprevir in combination with standard therapy are now available for the treatment of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. With boceprevir and telaprevir, four treatment options are, therefore, now available to clinicians. Phase 3 studies conducted with simeprevir and sofosbuvir compared sustained virological response (SVR) data with those obtained with standard combination therapy and did not include a control arm. It is important to quantify the contribution of these molecules compared to the first direct antiviral agents available. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For HCV genotype 1 patients, we performed a literature review and compared all SVR data from phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials conducted with these four molecules according to virological characteristics (genotype, viral load) and patient characteristics (IL28B polymorphism, stage of fibrosis). RESULTS: Simeprevir and sofosbuvir provide a net gain in terms of SVR compared to boceprevir and telaprevir except in the case of telaprevir for treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1b patients. Sofosbuvir achieves higher SVR rates than simeprevir except for treatment-naïve IL28B CC patients and naïve HCV genotype 1b patient. Further, simeprevir moderately improve SVR rates compared to telaprevir in treatment-naïve patients with F3-F4 fibrosis and with HCV genotype 1a infection. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir and simeprevir greatly improve the virological response rate compared to first-generation protease inhibitors. All of these data may help in guiding the physician's treatment decisions, based on financial constraints and patient characteristics. These data can be easily updated with future treatment and demonstrate the contribution of new treatment regimens to achieve optimal SVR rates.

Patients treated with first-generation HCV protease inhibitors exhibit high ribavirin concentrations.

Anemia is a well-known RBV-related event in HCV therapy which is exacerbated by the addition of telaprevir and boceprevir. This retrospective study evaluated and compared ribavirin exposure and parameters able to influence hemoglobin decrease in a large population of patients treated with dual or triple therapy. Patients on triple therapy had higher ribavirin concentrations at week 12 of treatment (3460 ng/mL vs. 1843 ng/mL; P < .0001). An association was also observed between week 12 eGFR and ribavirin concentration only for patients on triple therapy (P = .002). The proportion of patients with a >20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) decrease in eGFR at week 12 was higher among patients on triple therapy: 32%, 14%, and 5% for boceprevir, telaprevir, and dual therapy, respectively (P = .025 and .026). No correlation was observed between boceprevir and telaprevir concentrations and hemoglobin or eGFR decrease. Exacerbation of anemia in patients on triple therapy is related to higher ribavirin concentrations. We provide an explanation for this increase in plasma RBV concentration. Triple therapy with PEG-IFN, RBV, and telaprevir or boceprevir will remain the only HCV treatment option for many patients. Our data show that the RBV dose can be decreased while maintaining adequate plasma concentrations and reducing anemia.

Longitudinal liver stiffness assessment in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by means of transient elastography (TE) is accurate to predict fibrosis stage. The effect of antiviral treatment and virologic response on LS was assessed and compared with untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). METHODS: TE was performed at baseline, and at weeks 24, 48, and 72 in 515 patients with CHC. RESULTS: 323 treated (62.7%) and 192 untreated patients (37.3%) were assessed. LS experienced a significant decline in treated patients and remained stable in untreated patients at the end of study (P<0.0001). The decline was significant for patients with baseline LS ≥ 7.1 kPa (P<0.0001 and P 0.03, for LS ≥ 9.5 and ≥ 7.1 kPa vs lower values, respectively). Sustained virological responders and relapsers had a significant LS improvement whereas a trend was observed in nonresponders (mean percent change -16%, -10% and -2%, for SVR, RR and NR, respectively, P 0.03 for SVR vs NR). In multivariate analysis, high baseline LS (P<0.0001) and ALT levels, antiviral therapy and non-1 genotype were independent predictors of LS improvement. CONCLUSIONS: LS decreases during and after antiviral treatment in patients with CHC. The decrease is significant in sustained responders and relapsers (particularly in those with high baseline LS) and suggests an improvement in liver damage.

A new tool to study ribavirin-induced haemolysis.

BACKGROUND: Today, treatment of chronic hepatitis C is based on a synergistic combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin with antiprotease inhibitors. Haemolytic anaemia, which is the major side effect of ribavirin treatment, disrupts ribavirin treatment compliance and varies significantly from one patient to another. There is an individual susceptibility to ribavirin haemolysis. With a view to studying haemolysis, and thus optimizing the treatment response, we have developed a new in vitro tool for analysing the ribavirin-induced lysis of red blood cells. METHODS: Resuspended red blood cells were incubated with isotonic buffer and a range of concentrations of ribavirin. Haemolysis was quantified by spectrophotometric measurement of the supernatant at 540 nm. The assay was used to test the effects of various compounds and to investigate the susceptibility of patients to haemolytic anaemia. RESULTS: In our assay, the degree of haemolysis is dependent on the ribavirin concentration used and can be inhibited by the addition of dipyridamole (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)] 30 µM), ATP or glutathione (IC(50) 1.63 mM and 767 µM, respectively). We observed a strong decrease in red blood cell haemolysis in the presence of the ribavirin prodrug viramidine (Taribavirin(®)). When testing the performance of this assay with blood from 24 patients before treatment, we observed a strong correlation between in vitro haemolysis before treatment and the decrease in haemoglobin levels seen in vivo during subsequent treatment (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With this new tool it is possible to better evaluate individual susceptibility to ribavirin-induced haemolysis before the start of treatment. In addition, this model will enable the mechanism of ribavirin-induced anaemia to be further explored and allow molecules that could reduce ribavirin haemolysis to be screened and tested in vitro. This approach could help optimize current and future therapeutic strategies involving ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

The treatment response of chronically hepatitis C virus-infected patients depends on interferon concentration but not on interferon gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

The current treatment of chronic hepatitis C is based on pegylated alpha interferon (PEG-IFN-α) and ribavirin. The aim of this study was to identify biological and clinical variables related to IFN therapy that could predict patient outcome. The study enrolled 47 patients treated with PEG-IFN and ribavirin combined therapy. The interferon concentration was measured in serum by a bioassay. The expression of 93 interferon-regulated genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was quantified by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) before and after 1 month of treatment. The interferon concentration in the serum was significantly lower in nonresponders than in sustained virological responders. Moreover, a significant correlation was identified between interferon concentration and interferon exposition as well as body weight. The analysis of interferon-inducible genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells among the genes tested did not permit the prediction of treatment outcome. In conclusion, the better option seems to be to treat patients with weight-adjusted PEG-IFN doses, particularly for patients with high weight who are treated with PEG-IFN-α2a. Although the peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples are the easiest to obtain, the measurement of interferon-inducible genes seems not be the best strategy to predict treatment outcome.

Ribavirin monitoring in chronic hepatitis C therapy: anaemia versus efficacy.

The standard treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferon-alpha2a or -alpha2b and ribavirin is effective in <50% of HCV genotype-1-infected patients. To improve this figure, it might be desirable to obtain optimal plasma concentrations of the drug by increasing the dose. Unfortunately, there is great interpatient variability in ribavirin pharmacokinetics. In the present review, we describe the mechanism of ribavirin-induced anaemia in detail, evaluate host predictive factors for this harmful side effect and assess the literature data on attempts to improve the sustained virological response rate by increasing the dose of ribavirin. We suggest an optimal steady-state concentration range for ribavirin in monoinfected and coinfected patients. Lastly, we propose that it would be of particular value to monitor ribavirin concentrations in HCV genotype-1-infected patients and (regardless of the genotype) coinfected patients, haemodialyzed patients and obese patients.

Noninvasive diagnosis of large esophageal varices by Fibroscan: strong influence of the cirrhosis etiology.

BACKGROUND: Large esophageal varices (LOV) were diagnosed by endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis. Noninvasive method would be valuable. AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Fibroscan for LOV prediction and to investigate the prognostic value of liver stiffness (LS) in cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-three patients with cirrhosis (103 alcohol, 58 viral, and 22 others) underwent an endoscopy and a Fibroscan. Of those patients, 41 (22.4%) had LOV. RESULTS: Median LS was 33.66 kPa (range: 12-75), higher in patients with LOV than those without (51.24 +/- 1.61 vs. 29.81 +/- 1.82 kPa, p < 0.0001), and in alcoholic than nonalcoholic (40.39 +/- 1.75 vs. 25.73 +/- 1.82, p < 0.0001). In whole population, a LS > or =48 kPa predicted LOV with sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of 73.2, 73.2, 44.1, and 90.4%, respectively, and an area under ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.75 (CI 95%: 0.69-0.82). For alcoholic cirrhosis, LS was > or =47.2 kPa with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 84.6, 63.6, 44, and 92.5%, respectively, AUROC 0.77 (0.68-0.85). For viral cirrhosis, a LS > or =19.8 kPa generated diagnostic values of 88.9, 55.1, 26.7, and 96.4% and 0.73 (0.60-0.84). Sixteen (8.75%) patients died at 1 year. In multivariate analysis, LS was not predictive of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Etiology of cirrhosis has strong impact on LS cutoff for diagnosis of LOV. Studies should be performed with homogenous cirrhosis etiology.

[Prevention of hepatitis B transmission during the delivery in Picardy (2006)]. / La prévention de la transmission de l'hépatite B au cours de l'accouchement doit être améliorée: analyse de 145 dossiers dans les maternités de Picardie (2006).

OBJECT: No French publication is available to assess the prevention of the hepatitis B transmission during delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the traceability and the compliance with the guidelines for administration of hepatitis B immune globulin (Ig) in public and private maternities of Picardy. METHOD: We obtained the files of the mothers who were likely to be HBsAg + by a query in the medico-administrative data base (PMSI). Newborns who received hepatitis B Ig were obtained by the pharmacies and the obstetrical wards's registers and a PMSI query. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 maternities participated to the study. One hundred and forty five files were identified (65 mothers HBsAg +, 75 HBsAg -, 5 unknown) and 81 hepatitis B Ig injections were rated in the file and 5 unrated. Twenty percent of the rated Ig injections (16/81) were not pertinent (new born from HbsAg - mothers). Dose complied with the guidelines (100 UI) in 85 % of cases and the schedule (within the 12 first hours after delivery) in 79 %. The traceability was present in 69 % of the files. As a whole, only 40 % (32/81) of Ig injections follow the guidelines indications (indication, recommended dose and time, traceability). A letter (for general practitioner, pediatrician or hepatologist) for follow up of the baby or/and the mother was found in 40 files out of 145. DISCUSSION: The prevention of the hepatitis B transmission during the delivery must be improved through a national strategy with a multi-professional mobilisation plus a local implementation.

Emergence of a genomic variant of the recombinant 2k/1b strain during a mixed Hepatitis C infection: a case report.

To date, few natural intergenotypic recombinant hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains have been characterized. A recombinant strain 2k/1b was detected for one HCV RNA-positive individual who had just completed therapy for HCV 3a genotype infection. In the present report, five serum samples collected over the pre- and post-treatment periods were used to investigate all the present HCV strains and the change over time of the infection pattern. Interestingly, the 2k/1b strain was already present during the genotype 3a infection and persisted during treatment. In the specimen collected three months post-treatment, two distinct strains, 2k/1b and type 1, were found and then one 2k/1b strain in the subsequent ones. A genomic variant of the HCV RF1_2k/1b strain was identified. It was part of a mixed HCV infection and persisted and re-emerge after eradication of the dominant subtype 3a. This case indicates that HCV co-infection screening after relapse should be an alternative to explain the lack of response to treatment and the necessity to carefully study the epidemic spreading of this recombinant strain.

Optimizing the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis C.

Chronic hepatitis C is a major health concern. The current standard therapy is based on a combination of pegylated (PEG)-IFN-alpha and ribavirin (RBV). This treatment produces a sustained virological response (SVR) in approximately 55% of chronically infected patients. A number of virological factors (e.g., the hepatitis C virus [HCV] genotype and baseline titer of HCV RNA) may influence the treatment response. Indeed, the SVR rate is approximately 80% for patients infected with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, and approximately 45% for genotype 1 or 4 patients. Furthermore, the treatment duration can be modified as a function of the genotype. New drugs are being developed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C but will probably be used in combination with the current standard therapy. This means that improvements in therapy based on a PEG-IFN-RBV combination will remain a true challenge in the coming years. Recent clinical trial results have demonstrated that the current therapy can be optimized. Modulation of the treatment duration and/or the RBV dose may increase the SVR rate. The present article reviews the current approaches to optimizing the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

Marked iron overload related to ribavirin and iron sulfate treatment in a patient with active viral C cirrhosis.

Increased ferritin levels are common in the course of chronic hepatitis C, regardless of antiviral therapy. Usually, this increase in ferritin levels has minimal clinical and biological impact, and drops after therapy discontinuation. We report here on a dramatic increase in ferritin levels in a cirrhotic patient with hepatitis C treated by ribavirin monotherapy and oral iron sulphate, and discuss the possible mechanisms of this deleterious effect.

Are ascitic electrolytes usable in cirrhotic patients? Correlation of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea, and creatinine concentrations in ascitic fluid and blood.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of ascitic cirrhosis requires monitoring of blood biochemistry. A direct measure of ascites could simplify the medical procedure. We aimed to assess the correlation of sodium (Na), potassium (K), chloride (Cl), urea (U), and creatinine (Creat) in ascitic fluid and venous blood. METHODS: Ascitic fluid and venous blood samples were collected simultaneously from 70 cirrhotic patients. Na, K, Cl, U, and Creat were measured in all samples using a biochemical auto-analyzer. RESULTS: Results are expressed as the mean and SD of 200 concomitant samples of ascitic fluid and venous blood (mmol/L for Na, K, and Cl; g/L for U; mg/L for Creat). In ascites and blood the results were, respectively: 133.1+/-6.6 and 131.8+/-6.3 for Na (p<0.0001, r=0.95), 4.1+/-0.8 and 4.3+/-0.9 for K (p<0.0001, r=0.90), 107.2+/-7.6 and 101+/-7 for Cl (p<0.0001, r=0.93), 0.54+/-0.52 and 0.53+/-0.5 for U (p<0.0001, r=0.99), and 9.8+/-7.5 and 11+/-7 for Creat (p<0.0001, r=0.99). Analysis of ascites predicted blood results for different cut-offs (Na< or =125, K< or =3.2, K> or =5.5 and Creat> or =14) with a sensitivity of 1.00, 0.89, 0.71, and 0.92, and a specificity of 1.00, 0.95, 0.98, and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Correlations for Na, K, Cl, U, and Creat are strong between ascites and venous blood in cirrhotic patients. These parameters could, therefore, be assayed directly in ascitic fluid to monitor diuretic therapy in patients without venous access or when biochemical measurements, such as liver tests or coagulation tests, are not required, and in patients with poor venous access.

Prevalence of hepatitis C infection and risk factors in hospitalized diabetic patients: results of a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Although there may exist a nosocomial risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, this risk has not been fully investigated thus far and its magnitude is unknown. The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to evaluate the prevalence of, and risk factors for, hepatitis C infection in consecutive hospitalized patients with diabetes and to assess the nosocomial risk and magnitude of HCV infection in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive hospitalized patients with diabetes seen in 11 French hepatogastroenterology and diabetology departments were studied. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies was compared with that observed in healthy blood donors and individuals seen during routine medical checkup. Diabetic patients with anti-HCV antibodies were compared with patients without anti-HCV antibodies for assessment of risk factors. RESULTS: In total 1561 patients were studied. Independent risk factors for HCV infection were assessed through multivariate analysis. Thirty-three patients (2.11%) had anti-HCV antibodies and 21 (63.70%) had HCV identified risk factors. The prevalence of HCV infection was higher in patients with diabetes than in blood donors (0.08%) or healthy controls (0.20%) (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified four independent risk factors for HCV infection: blood transfusion before 1991 [odds ratio (OR)=2.88, P=0.033], intravenous drug use (OR=21.37, P=0.012), treatment in a hepatogastroenterology center (OR=4.17, P=0.002) and a high number (>2) of previous admissions since the onset of diabetes (OR=2.52, P=0.039). CONCLUSION: A nosocomial source of HCV infection in hospitalized diabetic patients is suggested by the increased risk of HCV infection associated with the number of hospitalizations. This may account for at least 36% of cases of HCV infection.

Low levels of hepatitis C virus (HCV) neutralizing antibodies in patients coinfected with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) neutralizing antibody (nAb) response in 37 subjects with HCV monoinfection and 37 HCV-infected subjects with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was evaluated using a focus reduction neutralization assay. HCV nAb levels were retrospectively studied in both groups of patients, who were matched on the basis of sex, age, and HCV genotype. The mean HCV nAb level (+/- standard deviation) among coinfected patients (1.613+/-0.416) was significantly less than that among monoinfected patients (1.912+/-0.578) (P= .013). Lower HCV nAb titers in coinfected patients could help worsen the outcome of HCV infection. These results favor starting HCV therapy as soon as possible in coinfected patients.