Atezolizumab-Induced Acrodermatitis and Pustular Psoriasis in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Rare Case Report.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are new drugs approved for the treatment of many types of malignancies. Despite their wide use and unquestionable clinical benefits, these agents have also been associated with a unique spectrum of side effects known as immune-related adverse events. In this study, we report the first case of atezolizumab-induced pustular psoriasis and acrodermatitis. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old woman presented to our department with erythematous-desquamative and pustular lesions involving all hands and feet fingers, inguinal region, and trunk, associated to severe psoriatic onychodystrophy. She was affected by non-small-cell lung carcinoma from 12 years, and 7 months before admission, she started a treatment with atezolizumab. Conclusion: Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as atezolizumab are linked to a plethora of adverse events. Identifying and treating certain adverse skin events, particularly in cancer patients, can be a challenge, leading oncologists to discontinue immunotherapy. Our case shows how it is necessary to have a shared therapeutic algorithm in order to manage serious skin reactions in cancer patients and avoid disruption of the oncotherapy.

Association of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Warfarin With Haemorrhagic Risk by Applying Correspondence Analysis to Data From the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database - A Case Study.

Introduction: Post-marketing data on the risks associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are conflicting and only few studies evaluated a comparison between each different DOAC. Real-world data from pharmacovigilance databases can help to better define the safety profile of each DOAC and warfarin. However, Correspondence Analysis (CA) could represent a useful tool in this context. Objective: In the attempt to assess the usefulness of CA as a signal detection pharmacovigilance tool, we applied this method to the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database (RNF, Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza), by comparing with disproportionality analysis on warfarin and DOACs. Methods: Study based on AEs sent to RNF by Campania Region from 2008 to 2021, in which warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban were reported as suspected drug. AEs were clustered into three Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs): Central Nervous System Haemorrhages and Conditions (CNSH), GastroIntestinal Perforation, Ulceration, Obstruction or Haemorrhages (GIPUOH) and other Haemorrhages (HH). Non-haemorrhagic AEs were included in a fourth cluster (nHH). Results: We retrieved 1,161 reports: 41.5% are associated to warfarin, 21.0% to dabigatran, 17.8% to rivaroxaban, 13.9% to apixaban and 5.8% to edoxaban. No significant differences in age distribution were observed. Results of CA showed that dabigatran and warfarin have the highest contribution (44.910 and 47.656, respectively) to the inertia of Dimension 1 as well as apixaban and dabigatran to the inertia of Dimension 2 (53.768 and 30.488, respectively). Edoxaban and rivaroxaban showed a negligible total contribution. CA biplot showed positive associations between warfarin and HH, apixaban and CNSH and dabigatran and nHH. Conclusion: Results seem to confirm that DOACs are not interchangeable. Apixaban was surprisingly associated with a higher risk of cerebral haemorrhage. As expected, our data support the better safety profile of DOACs than warfarin in terms of skin and respiratory tract hemorrhagic risks. Finally, we showed how CA could play a complementary role in analyzing data from pharmacovigilance databases.