Telehealth in the rehabilitation of female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The pandemic caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) increased the awareness and efforts to provide care from distance using information technologies. We reviewed the literature about the practice and effectiveness of the rehabilitation of the female pelvic floor dysfunction via telehealth regarding symptomatology and quality of life and function of pelvic floor muscles (PFM). METHODS: A bibliographic review was carried out in May 2020 in the databases: Embase, Medline/PubMed, LILACS and PEDro. A total of 705 articles were reviewed after the removal of duplicates. The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated by the PEDro scale. Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet. RESULTS: Four studies were included, two being randomized controlled trials. Among the RCTs, only one compared telehealth with face-to-face treatment; the second one compared telehealth with postal treatment. The other two studies are follow-up and cost analysis reports on telehealth versus postal evaluation. Data showed that women who received the intervention remotely presented significant improvement in their symptoms, such as reducing the number of incontinence episodes and voiding frequency, improving PFM strength and improving quality of life compared to women who had the face-to-face treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth promoted a significant improvement in urinary symptoms, PFM function and quality of life. Telehealth is still emerging, and more studies are needed to draw more conclusions. The recommendations of the governmental authorities, physical therapy councils and corresponding associations of each country also need to be considered.

Fast-track protocol for perioperative care in gynecological surgery: Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and surgical outcomes in patients admitted to a gynecological surgery ward before and after the implementation of an evidence-based multimodal and multiprofessional care protocol by the hospital staff. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this historically-controlled cross-sectional study, we compared clinical and surgical outcomes among all women admitted to the gynecological ward of a university public hospital for elective surgery for various reasons before and after the implementation of a multimodal care protocol. The protocol had been implemented to adjust the following procedures to evidence-based recommendations: fluid management/hydration, antimicrobial prophylaxis, management of nausea and vomiting, antithrombotic prophylactic therapy, preoperative fasting, mechanical bowel preparation (reduction), pain management, use of urinary catheters, and stimulus to ambulation. RESULTS: After the protocol implementation, fasting time was reduced in approximately 10 h. Patients had to undergo bowel preparation significantly less frequently, and the volume of fluids was reduced too. The use of nausea and vomit prophylaxis increased almost 20 times, but only nausea episodes were reduced. The frequency of antithrombotic prophylactic therapy more than doubled. Hospitalization time decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed significant improvements in clinical outcomes after the implementation of a multimodal protocol for perioperative care in the gynecological ward of a public university hospital in Brazil. The protocol implementation was associated with reductions in fasting time, bowel preparation, administration of fluids, pain, nausea and hospitalization time, allowing the treatment of more patients per year in the same ward.