Clinical, Biomechanical, and Self-reported Health Status After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Repair in Soccer Players: Results at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up.

Background: Performing meniscal repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to contribute to the long-term preservation of knee health and gait biomechanics. Purpose: To evaluate the role of meniscal repair in the performance of semiprofessional soccer players who returned to sport after ACLR. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study included 51 male soccer players (mean ± SD age, 28.82 ± 5.33 years) who underwent ACLR at a single institution between July 2018 and July 2019. The players were divided into 3 groups according to surgery type: ACLR only (n = 30), ACLR with lateral meniscal repair (n = 9), and ACLR with medial meniscal repair (n = 12). Outcomes were evaluated through clinical examination, self-reported health questionnaires (Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Tegner activity score, Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and ACL-Return to Sport After Injury), and biomechanical performance evaluations (balance, strength, coordination, and symmetry tests). Parametric and nonparametric tests were carried out for multiple comparisons. Results: The mean ± SD follow-up time was 20.75 ± 9.38 months. Although no significant differences emerged in clinical and self-reported health status, almost all the physical parameters tested resulted in lower performance in players treated with ACLR and meniscal repair. Moreover, patients with ACLR with lateral meniscal repair reported higher pain and fear of reinjury, with lower outcomes in terms of strength, symmetry, and coordination as compared with the other 2 groups. Balance abilities were significantly affected in players who underwent meniscal repair as compared with those who underwent ACLR only. Conclusion: The findings showed that biomechanical performance measures and fear of reinjury were significantly worse in soccer players with associated meniscal repair at a minimum 1-year follow-up, especially in those with a lateral meniscal tear.

Graft Intra-Articular Remodeling and Bone Incorporation in ACL Reconstruction: The State of the Art and Clinical Implications.

The knee is one of the most frequently affected joints in sports trauma, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and meniscal tears are the most common lesions. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) remains the treatment of choice for patients willing to return to their previous activity. There are different surgical techniques and different possible usable grafts. The graft used for ACLR surgery undergoes a bone incorporation process and an intra-articular remodelling named ligamentization until it reaches characteristics similar to the native ligament. After the first incorporation stage, the remodelling process is divided into an early stage that could last 4 weeks, a proliferative stage that lasts 4 to 12 weeks, and a final stage of ligamentization that could last over 1 year. The period of return to sport (RTS) after ACLR, which is becoming shorter and shorter, can be a high-risk period for athletes due to the risk of graft failure. This systematic review aims to define the phases of the ligamentization process considering graft type and fixation techniques, as well as the graft's anatomopathological and biomechanical characteristics, to evaluate a criterion-based rehab progression and maximize patient outcomes for an RTS respecting graft biology. The rehabilitative program has to promote and optimize the graft remodelling and incorporation processes; moreover, it has to accommodate physiological graft healing and avoid overloading. An early RTS and noncompliance with the biological characteristics of the graft in the various phases are associated with a high incidence of re-injury.

The importance of biomechanical assessment after Return to Play in athletes with ACL-Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Barriers to successful return to previous level of activity following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) are multifactorial and recent research suggests that athletic performance deficits persist after completion of the rehabilitation course in a large percentage of patients. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do technology-based biomechanical assessments reveal underneath differences in both recreational and competitive athletes in Return to Play after ACL-Reconstruction? METHODS: Thirty soccer athletes (26.9 ± 5.7 years old, male) with ACL injury were surgically treated with all-inside technique and semitendinosus tendon autograft. Before 2 years from surgery, they were called back for clinical examination, self-reported psychological scores, and biomechanical outcomes (balance, strength, agility and velocity, and symmetry). Athletes were classified into recreational (n = 15) and competitive (n = 15) according to the self-reported Return to Play Level based on the TALS post-injury. Nonparametric statistical tests have been adopted for group comparisons in terms of age, concomitant presence of meniscus tear, injury on dominant leg, presence of knee laxity, presence of varus/valgus, body sides, and return to different levels of sports. RESULTS: Competitive athletes showed better in terms of strength (45.3 ± 5.4 W kg-1 vs 39.3 ± 3.4 W kg-1, P ≤ 0.01) associated with good self-reported outcomes (TLKS, CRSQ) and low fear of reinjury (TSK). However, all the athletes had a functional deficit in at least one subtest, and a safe return to sports could not have been recommended. Our findings confirmed that demographics, physical function, and psychological factors were related to playing the preinjury level sport at mean 2 years after surgery, supporting the notion that returning to sport after surgery is multifactorial. SIGNIFICANCE: A strict qualitative and quantitative assessment of athletes' status should be performed at different follow-ups after surgery to guarantee a safe and controlled RTP.