No need to modify treatment within the first month after rapid start of a tailored antiretroviral therapy: the TWODAY Study.

The aim of the TWODAY Study was to investigate the frequency of early treatment change after rapid start of a tailored ART regimen (a 2-drug regimen - 2DR, when clinically feasible or a 3-drug regimen - 3DR, otherwise). TWODAY was an open-label, prospective, proof-of-concept, single center study. ART-naïve patients started their first-line regimen within a few days from the first laboratory testing with a 2DR of dolutegravir (DTG) and lamivudine (3TC) if CD4+ count >200 cells/mL, HIVRNA <500,000 copies/mL, no transmitted drug resistance to DTG or 3TC and HBsAg undetectable; otherwise, ART was started with a 3DR. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who needed to change ART within four week from start, for any reason. Thirty-two patients were enrolled; 19 (59.3%) were deemed eligible for a 2DR. Median time from laboratory testing to ART start was 5 days (5; 5). No regimen modification occurred within one month. In conclusion, no regimen modification was needed within the first month of treatment. Starting a 2DR within a few days after HIV diagnosis was feasible, relying upon complete results of the needed laboratory tests (including resistance testing). A 2DR can be safely proposed provided full laboratory tests are readily available.

Switching from a Non-Protease inhibitor-Based Regimen To the Fixed Dose Combination of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Clinical Practice.

Background: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of people living with HIV (PLWH) who switched from a non-protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen [integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)-based or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen] to darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF). Methods: This was a retrospective study on PLWH treated with a non-PI regimen in January 2017, who switched to D/C/F/TAF or to another antiretroviral therapy (ART) within November 2019. Follow-up was from the start date of D/C/F/TAF until the last available visit or discontinuation for any reason of this regimen. Virological failure (VF) was defined as 2 consecutive HIV-RNA values >50 copies/mL. Characteristics were reported as median (interquartile range) or frequency (%). A univariate Poisson regression model was used to measure the incidence rate of switch to D/C/F/TAF. Changes in laboratory parameters during D/C/F/TAF were assessed by univariate mixed linear models. Results: Overall, 3076 PLWH were included; 83% were male, median age at ART switch was 50 (42-56) years and median time on ART was 5.2 (0.3-13.0) years. PLWH had a median follow-up of 4.76 (3.70-6.38) years; during 17,099 person-years of follow-up (PYFU), 423/3076 (14%) participants discontinued the non-PI-based regimen and 106/423 (25%) switched to D/C/F/TAF, with an overall incidence rate of switch to D/C/F/TAF of 6.2 per 1000-PYFU (95% CI: 5.0-7.4). Among PLWH who switched to D/C/F/TAF, the ongoing regimen was based on NNRTIs in 37 (35%) and on InSTIs in 69 (65%). Main reasons leading to switch to D/C/F/TAF included neuropsychiatric adverse events (37%), VF (26%) and Kaposi sarcoma progression (5%). Conclusion: In the last years, a non-negligible proportion of patients on an NNRTI- or an InSTI-based regimen switched to D/C/F/TAF.

Residual viremia in HIV-infected patients who continue a two-drug or switch to a three-drug integrase strand transfer inhibitor based regimen.

In this randomized, single-centre, open-label, 96-week, superiority, controlled trial of 50 HIV-infected patients with HIV-RNA less than 50 copies/ml on a two-drug regimen based on dolutegravir as well as one reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI), switching to a single-tablet regimen of cobicistat, elvitregravir, emtricitabine along with tenofovir alafenamide did not appear to mitigate the burden of residual viremia, both at week 48 and at week 96. The immunological changes observed during follow-up and the safety of the two regimens were similar.

Analytical treatment interruption in chronic HIV-1 infection: time and magnitude of viral rebound in adults with 10 years of undetectable viral load and low HIV-DNA (APACHE study).

OBJECTIVES: Despite the fact that there are individuals who have chronic HIV infection, few studies have investigated ART interruption in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability to spontaneously control viral replication during analytical treatment interruption (ATI) in adults with chronic HIV-1 infection, on ART, with suppressed viraemia for >10 years and with a low reservoir. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized, proof-of-concept study (NCT03198325) of subjects with chronic HIV-1 infection, HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL for ≥10 years, without residual viraemia for ≥5 years, CD4+ >500 cells/mm3, HIV-DNA <100 copies/106 PBMCs and without comorbidities or AIDS-defining diseases. Enrolled patients were strictly monitored. The ART regimen in use at ATI was resumed in the case of confirmed viral rebound (CVR, two consecutive HIV-RNA >50 copies/mL). Results are reported as median (IQR). RESULTS: Nine patients underwent ATI. All participants experienced CVR [4.84 (IQR: 3.47-6.47) HIV-RNA log10 copies/mL] after ATI at a median time of 21 days (range 14-56) and restarted ART. After ART resumption, all the subjects achieved HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL in a median of 88 days (range 15-197). No serious adverse event occurred; one subject experienced acute retroviral syndrome. No significant correlation between baseline factors and time to viral rebound was observed, while the magnitude of viral rebound was significantly associated with pre-ART HIV-1 RNA (Spearman r = 0.786, P = 0.036), nadir CD4+ (Spearman r = -0.800, P = 0.010), baseline CD4+ (Spearman r = -0.667, P = 0.049) and years with undetectable viral load (Spearman r = -0.717, P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a long period of HIV viral load suppression and a low viral reservoir, early and consistent viral rebound was observed during ATI in all subjects.

Long-term efficacy and safety of rilpivirine plus abacavir and lamivudine in HIV-1 infected patients with undetectable viral load.

INTRODUCTION: A regimen with rilpivirine (RPV), abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) is simple and may allow the sparing of tenofovir and protease inhibitors. However, data on use of this combination as a strategy of switch are limited. Aims of the study were to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of this regimen. METHODS: Retrospective study on HIV-1 infected patients followed at the Infectious Disease Department of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, HBsAg-negative, HLA B5701-negative, with no documented resistance to RPV, ABC and 3TC, with HIV-RNA<50 copies/mL who started RPV plus ABC/3TC from March 2013 to September 2015. The primary outcome was durability [no treatment failure (TF)]. Secondary objectives were to evaluate changes in immunological, metabolic and other safety parameters. TF was defined as the occurrence of virological failure (VF, 2 consecutive values >50 copies/mL) or discontinuation of any drug in the regimen for any reason. Patients' follow-up accrued from the date of RPV plus ABC/3TC initiation to the date of TF (VF or discontinuation of any drug in the regimen) or to the date of last available visit. Time to TF was evaluated by use of the Kaplan-Meier curves. Mixed linear models were applied to evaluate changes in immunological, metabolic and other safety parameters. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In this analysis, 100 patients starting RPV plus ABC/3TC were included. By 12, 24 and 36 months after switching to RPV plus ABC/3TC, the proportions of individuals without TF were 88% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79%-93%], 82% (95% CI:73%-89%) and 78% (95% CI:68%-86%), respectively. Time to TF was not significantly influenced by CD4+ nadir (≤200 vs >200 cells/µl; log-rank test: p = 0.311) or pre-ART viral load (<100000 vs ≥100000 copies/mL; log-rank test: p = 0.574) or the type of previous antiretroviral regimen (PI+2NRTIs vs NNRTI+2NRTIs vs Other; log-rank test: p = 0.942). Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years (IQR: 1.9-3.5), 26 subjects discontinued the treatment [10 due to toxicity, 7 for interactions with other drugs, 3 due to cardiovascular risk concern, 2 due to single viral blip, 1 due to VF, 1 for asthma, 1 patient's decision, 1 due to enrolment in a study protocol]. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, long-term use of RPV plus ABC/3TC regimen is effective and safe. Efficacy of this regimen was not found to be affected by low CD4+ nadir or high pre-ART viral load.

Associations of statins and antiretroviral drugs with the onset of type 2 diabetes among HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Statin use is associated with a modest increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) among the general population. However, HIV-infected patients have a higher risk of developing DM, and it is unclear whether statins have a diabetogenic effect in these patients. Therefore, we investigated the associations of statin use and exposure to antiretroviral drugs with type 2 DM onset in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This retrospective, controlled, cohort study identified HIV-1-infected patients who did not have DM and were not receiving statins at their antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation. Follow-up was accrued from ART initiation to the earliest instance of a DM diagnosis, loss to follow-up, death, or last available visit. The incidence of DM was estimated according to statin use, which was adjusted for periods without statin treatment. The Fine-Gray competing risk model was used in the multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for developing DM. RESULTS: The analyses evaluated 6,195 patients followed for 9.8 years (interquartile range: 4.3-16.3 years). During 64,149 person-years of follow-up (PYFU), 235 patients developed DM (crude incidence: 3.66 [95%CI: 3.20-4.13] per 1,000 PYFU), and 917 (14%) patients used statins. After adjusting for potential confounders, statin use was associated with a non-significant increase in the risk of DM (AHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.71-2.07; P = 0.47). DM was more likely among patients who were ever treated with stavudine, and less likely among those ever treated using emtricitabine, tenofovir, abacavir, efavirenz, nevirapine, atazanavir or darunavir. CONCLUSIONS: A higher risk of diabetes mellitus was not associated with statin treatment but with traditional risk factors and stavudine use while a reduced risk of DM was associated with the use of emtricitabine, tenofovir, abacavir, efavirenz, nevirapine, atazanavir or darunavir.

Unboosted atazanavir with lamivudine/emtricitabine for patients with long-lasting virological suppression.

INTRODUCTION: Unboosted atazanavir (ATV) including regimens have been investigated as a ritonavir-sparing simplification strategy. No data are available on removal of one NRTI in subjects effectively treated with unboosted atazanavir+2NRTIs. We present the 48-week virological efficacy and safety of unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) (lamivudine/emtricitabine/Reyataz(©), LAREY Study). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single arm, prospective, pilot study on HIV-treated patients, HBsAg negative, with HIV-RNA<50 cps/mL since at least 2 years, who switched from ATV+2NRTIs to ATV 400 mg QD +3TC or FTC. Virological failure was defined as 2 consecutive values of HIV-RNA>50 cps/ml; viral blip was defined as a single HIV-RNA value>50 cps/ml not subsequently confirmed. RESULTS as median (IQR). Changes between baseline (BL) and week 48 assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Forty patients enrolled: 75% males, 51 (47-54) years, 14% HCV co-infected, infected with HIV since 16 (9-21) years, on antiretroviral therapy since 13 (5-16) years, with a nadir CD4+ of 254 (157-307) cells/mm(3), virologically suppressed since 4.2 (2.2-5.4) years; 53 patients switched from a tenofovir (TDF)-based regimens; ATV was associated with 3TC in 83% patients. No virological failures or discontinuations were observed; three patients had a single viral blip in the range 50-250 copies/mL; CD4+ increased from 610 (518-829) cells/mm(3) at BL to 697 (579-858) cells/mm(3) at week 48 [48-week change: 39 (-63/+160) cells/mm(3) p=0.081]. Three clinical events were observed (one herpes zoster, one pneumonia, one syphilis) in absence of renal lithiasis, AIDS-defining or drug-related events or death. Overall, significant 48-week amelioration of ALP [BL: 83 (71-107) mg/dL; 48-week change: -15 (-27/-8) mg/dL p<0.0001] and CKD-EPI [BL: 100 (86-108) ml/min/1.73 m(2); 48-week change: 1.5 (-3/+8) ml/min/1.73 m(2), p=0.042] were observed. Patients switching from TDF (Table 1) significantly improved CD4+, lymphocytes, hepatic profile, renal profile and ALP; these patients had also a modest but significant decrease in haemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Switch from an unboosted atazanavir-based regimen to ATV+3TC or FTC regimen was effective and safe in this small sample, supporting the hypothesis of a potential two-steps de-intensification (removal of ritonavir and removal of one NRTI) in patients on long-lasting virological suppression.

Simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy for HIV-1 treated individuals on virological suppression: 48-week efficacy and safety results.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the 48-week virological efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) monotherapy vs. ATV/r along with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTIs) in HIV-1 treated individuals with HIV-RNA less than 50 copies/ml. METHODS: A multicentre, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. HIV-1 treated individuals on ATV/r 300/100 mg along with two NRTIs were randomized to receive ATV/r monotherapy or to maintain their antiretroviral regimen. The primary endpoint was the confirmed viral rebound (CVR: two consecutive HIV-RNA >50 copies/ml) or treatment discontinuation for any reason. Individuals who experienced CVR on ATV/r monotherapy reintroduced NRTIs and discontinued the study if HIV-RNA was more than 50 copies/ml after 12 weeks since reintensification. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients enrolled. By week 48, 11 patients in ATV/r arm and two in ATV/r along with two NRTIs experienced CVR; four (8%) patients in ATV/r and eight (15%) in ATV/r along with two NRTIs discontinued. At the 48-week primary efficacy analysis (re-intensification = failure), treatment success was 73% in ATV/r arm and 85% in ATV/r along with two NRTIs [difference -12.1%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -27.8 to 2.1]. According to the analysis considering re-intensification is equal to success, treatment success was 92% in ATV/r arm and 85% in the ATV/r along with two NRTIs arm (difference 7.5%, 95% CI -4.7 to 19.8). At CVR, no mutation was observed in ATV/r arm and reintensification with NRTIs was effective in all individuals. Overall, Grade 3-4 (P = 0.003) and grade 3-4 drug-related (P = 0.027) adverse events were less frequent in ATV/r arm. A significant increase in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol was observed as well as a significant improvement in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, fasting glucose, liver fibrosis and alkaline phosphatase was observed in ATV/r monotherapy in comparison with ATV/r along with two NRTIs. CONCLUSION: ATV/r monotherapy treatment simplification showed lower virological efficacy in comparison with maintaining triple therapy; NRTIs reintroduction was effective in all the individuals.

Long-term glucose tolerance in highly experienced HIV-infected patients receiving nucleoside analogue-sparing regimens.

Thirty-nine HIV-1-infected patients treated for 156 weeks with a new nucleoside analogue-sparing regimen [raltegravir, etravirine and maraviroc (REM) or raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir/ritonavir (RED)] showed a uniform increase in fasting glucose levels and a uniform decrease in insulin secretory capacity. Diabetes mellitus occurred in one RED-treated and four REM-treated patients. A worsening glucose tolerance was observed in highly treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients receiving effective antiretroviral therapy after virological failure.

Lamivudine monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients harbouring a lamivudine-resistant virus: a randomized pilot study (E-184V study).

OBJECTIVE: We compared the immunological and clinical outcomes of lamivudine monotherapy and complete therapy interruption in the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients harbouring lamivudine-resistant virus. METHODS: This 48-week, open-label pilot study randomly assigned HIV-infected patients receiving lamivudine-containing HAART and harbouring the M184V mutation to monotherapy with lamivudine 300 mg once daily (lamivudine group) or the discontinuation of all antiretroviral drugs (TI group). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of immunological or clinical failure; immunological failure was defined as the first report of a CD4 T-cell count less than 350 cells/microl, and clinical failure as the occurrence of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grade B or C event. The data were analysed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: By week 48, 20 of 29 patients in the TI group (69%; 95% CI 51-83%) and 12 of 29 in the lamivudine group (41%; 95% CI 26-59%) had discontinued the study because of immunological or clinical failure, which was significantly delayed in the lamivudine group (P = 0.018). Only patients in the TI group (6/29, 20.7%) experienced grade 3-4 clinical adverse events at least possibly related to HIV-1 (P = 0.02). The mean decline in CD4 cell percentage, viral rebound and recovery of HIV-1 replication capacity were significantly lower in the lamivudine group. The 24-week virological and immunological response after therapy resumption in patients who prematurely discontinued the study was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In HIV-1-infected patients harbouring a lamivudine-resistant virus, lamivudine monotherapy may lead to a better immunological and clinical outcome than complete therapy interruption.

Selective increase in serum IgE following enfuvirtide administration in HIV-1 infected multidrug resistant patients.

Enfuvirtide (ENF) is the first HIV-1 entry inhibitor used in clinical practice and is currently administered via the subcutaneous route. We here evaluated whether ENF administration leads to a change in humoral parameters, including IgE, possibly related to ENF-associated injection site reactions (ISRs). A 24-week prospective study was conducted in multidrug resistant patients enrolled in the ENF Early Access Program characterized by CD4 counts < or =100 cells/microlitre and no other active antiretroviral drug. Licensed commercial laboratory assays were used to measure the parameters considered in this study. Results are reported as medians (interquartiles IQR). Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon sign rank, Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskall Wallis tests. Total IgM, IgA and IgG did not change significantly throughout the study. Conversely, a significant increase in IgE was observed in all patients, in those with normal as well as in those with altered IgE at baseline (BL). ISRs such as induration and number of nodules were more frequent in patients with altered BL IgE. IgE increased significantly in all patients, regardless of the different stratifications in their BL CD4 counts. Of note, the ENF-induced increase in CD4 occurred significantly in all patients, independently of their BL IgE levels. The immunological response associated with ENF treatment is accompanied by a selective increase in IgE levels. Determination of IgE could be used in the monitoring ISRs associated with ENE

Higher plasma lopinavir concentrations are associated with a moderate rise in cholestasis markers in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between liver function markers (necrosis and cholestasis) and plasma lopinavir levels in a cohort of HIV-infected patients treated with lopinavir and ritonavir. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The blood samples for determining steady-state C(trough) lopinavir levels and analysing liver function were drawn from fasting patients. Steady-state C(trough) lopinavir levels, liver function and immuno-virological markers were assessed on the same day. Plasma lopinavir and ritonavir levels were determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine patients were included in the analysis [57 were HCV co-infected (34%) and 10 were HBV co-infected (6.7%)]; they had been treated with lopinavir/ritonavir for a median of 232 days (range 132-282). All patients received lopinavir/ritonavir [400/100 mg twice daily or 533/133 mg twice daily if amprenavir or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) was part of therapy] and concomitant therapy with NRTI(s). Median (interquartile) lopinavir trough levels were 6391 ng/mL (4121-8726), 5662 (3585-8893) and 6819 ng/mL (5324-8726) in the patients with HIV alone and those with HIV/HCV (or HBV) co-infection, respectively (P = not significant). Univariate analysis showed a significant association between the cholestasis markers and C(trough) lopinavir level. Multivariate analysis selected only gamma glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) (OR = 1.010, 95% CI: 1.002-1.021) as being independently associated with plasma lopinavir levels of >6425 ng/mL; alkaline phosphatase (OR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.000-1.010; P = 0.08) and total bilirubin (OR = 3.118, 95% CI: 0.980-11.715; P = 0.07) were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated lopinavir concentrations are associated with raised GGT.

Genotype and phenotype patterns of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to enfuvirtide during long-term treatment.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide has recently been introduced into clinical practice and has exhibited efficient anti-HIV-1 activity in combination with other antiretroviral agents. In the present study, we addressed the effect of long-term treatment with enfuvirtide on the intrahost evolution of HIV-1. The genotype and phenotype patterns and the relative replication capacity (rRC) of enfuvirtide-resistant HIV-1 mutants were evaluated in samples from 11 subjects (7 virological nonresponders and 4 responders) who received the compound for more than 1 year in combination with different regimens. Selection of one or more mutations clustering in a sequence (amino acids 36 to 45) of the gp41 N-terminal heptad repeat was observed in samples from the seven virological nonresponders but not in those from responders. In two subjects who discontinued enfuvirtide, reversion of the resistant genotype was detected within 3 months. Recombinant clones bearing mutated gp41 sequences displayed reduced susceptibilities to enfuvirtide, with the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s) ranging from 0.6 to 12.8 microg/ml, whereas the IC(50) for isolates with baseline sequences was 0.013 +/- 0.010 microg/ml. Interestingly, long-term monitoring of resistant variants provided evidence that ongoing adaptation to the drug is paralleled by phenotypic changes. A limited drop in the rRC in the absence of drug was observed for clones from four of the seven nonresponders bearing mutations associated with resistance. Overall, the data indicate that the different genotype patterns associated with a detectable degree of HIV-1 resistance to enfuvirtide generated during long-term treatments are characterized by a substantially low genetic barrier, possible ongoing adaptation with increased degrees of resistance, and limited influence on the viral rRC.