An ecotoxicological view on neurotoxicity assessment.

The numbers of potential neurotoxicants in the environment are raising and pose a great risk for humans and the environment. Currently neurotoxicity assessment is mostly performed to predict and prevent harm to human populations. Despite all the efforts invested in the last years in developing novel in vitro or in silico test systems, in vivo tests with rodents are still the only accepted test for neurotoxicity risk assessment in Europe. Despite an increasing number of reports of species showing altered behaviour, neurotoxicity assessment for species in the environment is not required and therefore mostly not performed. Considering the increasing numbers of environmental contaminants with potential neurotoxic potential, eco-neurotoxicity should be also considered in risk assessment. In order to do so novel test systems are needed that can cope with species differences within ecosystems. In the field, online-biomonitoring systems using behavioural information could be used to detect neurotoxic effects and effect-directed analyses could be applied to identify the neurotoxicants causing the effect. Additionally, toxic pressure calculations in combination with mixture modelling could use environmental chemical monitoring data to predict adverse effects and prioritize pollutants for laboratory testing. Cheminformatics based on computational toxicological data from in vitro and in vivo studies could help to identify potential neurotoxicants. An array of in vitro assays covering different modes of action could be applied to screen compounds for neurotoxicity. The selection of in vitro assays could be guided by AOPs relevant for eco-neurotoxicity. In order to be able to perform risk assessment for eco-neurotoxicity, methods need to focus on the most sensitive species in an ecosystem. A test battery using species from different trophic levels might be the best approach. To implement eco-neurotoxicity assessment into European risk assessment, cheminformatics and in vitro screening tests could be used as first approach to identify eco-neurotoxic pollutants. In a second step, a small species test battery could be applied to assess the risks of ecosystems.

Association between the SDF1-3'A allele and high levels of CD34(+) progenitor cells mobilized into peripheral blood in humans.

Some patients unexpectedly fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) into the peripheral blood for autologous transplantation. Considering the important role of the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) in HPC homing, we investigated a possible relationship between SDF1 gene polymorphism and HPC mobilization capacity in 63 patients with malignancy. Some 67% of the good mobilizers (> or = 50 CD34(+) cells/microl) and only 36% of the intermediate/poor mobilizers were SDF1-3'A allele carriers (P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, the presence of the SDF1-3'A allele was the only factor predictive of good CD34(+) cell mobilization (P = 0.025). This is the first report showing the involvement of genetic factors for HPC mobilization in humans and suggests a significant role for SDF-1 in this process.

Crossflow microfiltration of animal cells.

Laminar shear is the primary mechanism of cell damage, limiting flow rate (and hence flux) in crossflow microfiltration of animal cells. Sensitivity to hydrodynamic and interfacial stress is reduced by the addition of 0.1% Pluronic polyol. A critical average wall shear rate of 3000 s(-1) (above which damage occurs) is found for several cell types, including mammalian and insect cells. Hydrodynamic stress also limits the maximum tip speed in a rotary lobe pump to less than 350 cm/s. Turbulent flow in the recirculation loop piping at Reynolds numbers of up to 71,000 does not cause cell damage. Maximum sustainable flux decreases with cell concentration and increases with cell size (in qualitative agreement with the hydrodynamic lift model). A flux of 30 to 75 L/m(2) h (depending on cell size) can be sustained during 20-fold concentration from 2.5 x 10(6) cells/ml, while maintaining high cell viability.