Exercise intolerance in post-coronavirus disease 2019 survivors after hospitalisation.

Rationale: Post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors frequently have dyspnoea that can lead to exercise intolerance and lower quality of life. Despite recent advances, the pathophysiological mechanisms of exercise intolerance in the post-COVID-19 patients remain incompletely characterised. The objectives of the present study were to clarify the mechanisms of exercise intolerance in post-COVID-19 survivors after hospitalisation. Methods: This prospective study evaluated consecutive patients previously hospitalised due to moderate-to-severe/critical COVID-19. Within mean±sd 90±10 days of onset of acute COVID-19 symptoms, patients underwent a comprehensive cardiopulmonary assessment, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing with earlobe arterialised capillary blood gas analysis. Measurements and main results: 87 patients were evaluated; mean±sd peak oxygen consumption was 19.5±5.0 mL·kg-1·min-1, and the tertiles were ≤17.0, 17.1-22.2 and ≥22.3 mL·kg-1·min-1. Hospitalisation severity was similar among the three groups; however, at the follow-up visit, patients with peak oxygen consumption ≤17.0 mL·kg-1·min-1 reported a greater sensation of dyspnoea, along with indices of impaired pulmonary function, and abnormal ventilatory, gas-exchange and metabolic responses during exercise compared to patients with peak oxygen consumption >17 mL·kg-1·min-1. By multivariate logistic regression analysis (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) adjusted for age, sex and prior pulmonary embolism, a peak dead space fraction of tidal volume ≥29 and a resting forced vital capacity ≤80% predicted were independent predictors of reduced peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions: Exercise intolerance in the post-COVID-19 survivors was related to a high dead space fraction of tidal volume at peak exercise and a decreased resting forced vital capacity, suggesting that both pulmonary microcirculation injury and ventilatory impairment could influence aerobic capacity in this patient population.

A Simplified Approach to Select Exercise Endurance Intensity for Interventional Studies in COPD.

Time to exercise limitation (Tlim) in response to constant work rate (CWR) is sensitive to interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This is particularly true when the pre-intervention test lasts between 3 and 8 min (Tlim3'-8'). There is, however, no simple method to select a work rate which is consistently associated with Tlim3'-8' across the spectrum of COPD severity. We assessed 59 GOLD stages II-IV patients who initially cycled to Tlim at 75% peak. In case of short (<3 min, low-endurance) or long (>8 min, high-endurance) tests, patients exercised after 60 min at 50% or 90%, respectively (CWR50%⇐75%⇒90%). Critical mechanical constraints and limiting dyspnea at 75% were reached within the desired timeframe in 27 "mid-endurance" patients (46%). Increasing work rate intensity to 90% hastened the mechanical-ventilatory responses leading to Tlim3'-8' in 23/26 (88%) "high-endurance" patients; conversely, decreasing exercise intensity to 50% slowed those responses leading to Tlim3'-8' in 5/6 (83%) "high-endurance" patients. Repeating the tests at higher (60%) or lower (80%) intensities fail to consistently produce Tlim3'-8' in "low-" and "high-endurance", respectively (p > 0.05). Compared to a fixed work rate at 75%, CWR50%⇐75%⇒90% significantly decreased Tlim's coefficient of variation; consequently, the required N to detect 100 s or 33% improvement in Tlim decreased from 82 to 26 and 41 to 14, respectively. This simplified approach to individualized work rate adjustment (CWR50%⇐75%⇒90%) might allow greater sensitivity in evaluating interventional efficacy in improving respiratory mechanics and exercise tolerance while simultaneously reducing sample size requirements in patients with COPD.