Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respir Care ; 53(12): 1678-84, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19025702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium is used in maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but there are no guidelines on when to start tiotropium following an exacerbation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of tiotropium to a respiratory-therapist-directed bronchodilator protocol affects bronchodilator costs for patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data on the number and type of bronchodilator treatments administered to all patients admitted for COPD exacerbation during the 3-month period (January through March 2006) after tiotropium was added to our bronchodilator protocol, and compared that data to a historical control period (January through March 2004) before tiotropium was available in our hospital. We compared the costs of bronchodilator treatments, baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, concomitant medications, length of stay, adverse events, and in-hospital deaths. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were similar in the 2004 control group (n = 181) and the 2006 intervention group (n = 174). The mean +/- SD number of bronchodilator treatments per admission was significantly higher in the control period (13.6 +/- 15.6) than in the intervention period (10.6 +/- 9.4). That difference correlated to a reduction in combination therapy (short-acting inhaled beta(2) agonist plus ipratropium), which decreased from a per-admission average of 6.7 +/- 14.2 in the control period to 1.9 +/- 5.1 in the intervention period. Calculated bronchodilator costs were significantly lower in the intervention period than in the control period. Length of stay also significantly decreased, from 6.5 +/- 5.0 d to 5.5 +/- 4.0 d. There were no adverse events related to tiotropium. Pulmonary-related in-hospital deaths were not significantly different between the 2 periods. CONCLUSIONS: Early addition of maintenance-treatment tiotropium to a respiratory-therapist-directed bronchodilator protocol for patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation reduced costs and produced no safety concerns.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Respiratória , Derivados da Escopolamina/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/economia , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudos de Coortes , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Derivados da Escopolamina/administração & dosagem , Derivados da Escopolamina/economia , Brometo de Tiotrópio , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Asthma ; 42(1): 29-34, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15801325

RESUMO

This prospective study was designed to determine whether incorporating formoterol into a standardized respiratory therapist-directed protocol for administering bronchodilators to hospitalized patients with obstructive airway disease would reduce health care resource use and provide a safety advantage. All patients admitted to Washington Hospital Center with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CODP) are administered bronchodilators under a standardized respiratory therapist-directed protocol. Formoterol was the primary bronchodilator for the intervention period from January through March 2002, with levalbuterol, albuterol, and ipratropium available as needed. Results for the intervention period were compared against two historical control periods. From January through March 2000, the bronchodilators in the protocol were albuterol and ipratropium, and from January through March 2001 levalbuterol, albuterol, and ipratropium were available. Health care resource use was determined by the number of bronchodilator treatments administered per admission. Costs (adjusted to 2002 dollars) for supplies, therapist time, and drugs were calculated for the three time periods. Adverse events related to bronchodilator administration were recorded in a standardized manner for all three time periods. Bronchodilator treatments per admission, respiratory therapist visits per admission, and time spent per admission, and cost per bronchodilator treatment significantly decreased in 2002. Significantly fewer adverse events related to bronchodilator treatments were reported in 2002 than 2000. The addition of formoterol to a respiratory therapist-directed protocol for administering bronchodilators reduced health care resource use and adverse events for patients with asthma and COPD.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Albuterol/administração & dosagem , Asma/economia , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/economia , Protocolos Clínicos , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanolaminas/administração & dosagem , Etanolaminas/economia , Feminino , Fumarato de Formoterol , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Ipratrópio/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Cooperação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...