Utilidad pronóstica de la presión de pulso en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca con fracción de eyección preservada: Registro RICA / Prognostic utility of pulse pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The RICA Registry

Background and aims The prognostic role of pulse pressure (PP) in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is not well understood. Our aim was to evaluate it in acute and stable HF. Material and methods This work is a retrospective observational study of patients included in the RICA registry between 2008 and 2021. Blood pressure was collected on admission (decompensation) and 3 months later on an outpatient basis (stability). Patients were categorized according to whether the PP was greater or less than 50mmHg. All-cause mortality was assessed at 1year after admission. Results A total of 2291 patients were included, with mean age 80.1±7.7 years. 62.9% were women and 16.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. In the acute phase, there was no difference in mortality according to PP values, but in the stable phase PP<50mmHg was independently associated with all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21−2.05, p=0.001), after adjusting for age, sex, New York Heart Association functional class, previous HF, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, score on the Barthel and Pfeiffer scales, hemoglobin and sodium levels. Conclusion Low stable-phase PP was associated with increased all-cause mortality in HF patients with preserved LVEF. However, PP was not useful as a prognostic marker of mortality in acute HF. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship of this variable with mortality in HF patients (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo El papel pronóstico de la presión de pulso (PP) en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) con fracción de eyección de ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) preservada no es bien conocido. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluarlo en fases de descompensación y de estabilidad. Material y métodos Estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes incluidos en registro RICA entre 2008 y 2021. La presión arterial se recogió al ingreso (descompensación) y a los 3 meses (estabilidad). Se calculó la PP y los pacientes se categorizaron según PP mayor/igual vs menor de 50mmHg. Se evaluó la mortalidad por todas las causas al año del ingreso. Resultados Se incluyeron 2.291 pacientes, con edad media 80,1±7,7 años. El 62,9% eran mujeres y un 16,7% tenían antecedentes de cardiopatía isquémica. En fase aguda, no hubo diferencias en la mortalidad según los valores de PP, pero en fase estable una PP<50mmHg se asoció de forma independiente con mortalidad por todas las causas al año de seguimiento (HR 1,57, IC 95% 1,21-2,05; p=0,001), una vez controlado por edad, sexo, NYHA, IC previa, enfermedad renal crónica, valvulopatía, enfermedad cerebrovascular, Barthel, Pfeiffer, hemoglobina y sodio. Conclusione Una PP baja en fase estable se asoció con mayor mortalidad por todas las causas en pacientes con IC con FEVI preservada. Sin embargo, la PP no demostró ser un factor pronóstico en fase de descompensación. Se necesitan más estudios que valoren la relación de esta variable con la mortalidad en los pacientes con IC (AU)

Prognostic utility of pulse pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The RICA Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prognostic role of pulse pressure (PP) in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is not well understood. Our aim was to evaluate it in acute and stable HF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This work is a retrospective observational study of patients included in the RICA registry between 2008 and 2021. Blood pressure was collected on admission (decompensation) and 3 months later on an outpatient basis (stability). Patients were categorized according to whether the PP was greater or less than 50mmHg. All-cause mortality was assessed at 1year after admission. RESULTS: A total of 2291 patients were included, with mean age 80.1±7.7 years. 62.9% were women and 16.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. In the acute phase, there was no difference in mortality according to PP values, but in the stable phase PP<50mmHg was independently associated with all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.05, p=0.001), after adjusting for age, sex, New York Heart Association functional class, previous HF, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, score on the Barthel and Pfeiffer scales, hemoglobin and sodium levels. CONCLUSIONS: Low stable-phase PP was associated with increased all-cause mortality in HF patients with preserved LVEF. However, PP was not useful as a prognostic marker of mortality in acute HF. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship of this variable with mortality in HF patients.

Beneficios de un modelo asistencial integral en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca y fracción de eyección preservada: Programa UMIPIC / Benefits of a comprehensive care model in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: The UMIPIC program

Antecedentes Los pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) y fracción de eyección preservada (ICFEp), a diferencia de aquellos con fracción de eyección reducida, son más ancianos, presentan más comorbilidades y no son candidatos a medidas terapéuticas eficaces. Por todo ello presentan un riesgo elevado de ingreso hospitalario y mortalidad. En este estudio se evaluó el beneficio de un modelo asistencial, caracterizado por una atención integral y continuada (programa UMIPIC) en pacientes con ICFEp. Métodos Se analizaron prospectivamente los datos de 2.401 pacientes con ICFEp atendidos en servicios de medicina interna, procedentes del registro RICA. Se dividieron en 2 grupos, uno en seguimiento en el programa UMIPIC (grupo UMIPIC, n: 1.011) y otro atendido de forma convencional (grupo RICA, n: 1.390). Se seleccionaron por emparejamiento (propensity score matching) 753 pacientes en cada grupo y se evaluaron los ingresos y la mortalidad durante 12 meses de seguimiento, tras un episodio de hospitalización por IC. Resultados El grupo UMIPIC, con respecto al RICA, en la cohorte emparejada, tuvo una menor tasa de ingresos por IC (19,2% frente a 36,5% respectivamente; hazard ratio [HR]=0,56; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 0,45-0,68; p<0,001) y de mortalidad (12,6% frente a 28%, respectivamente; HR=0,40; IC 95%: 0,31-0,51; p<0,001). No se observaron diferencias en cuanto a ingresos por causas distintas a la IC. Conclusiones La implementación del programa asistencial UMIPIC a pacientes con ICFEp y elevada comorbilidad, basado en una atención integral y continuada, reduce tanto los ingresos como la mortalidad al año de seguimiento (AU)

Background Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to those with reduced ejection fraction, are older, have more comorbidities, and are not candidates for effective therapeutic measures. Therefore, they are at high risk for hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care program (UMIPIC program) in patients with HFpEF. Methods We prospectively analyzed data on 2,401 patients with HFpEF attended to in internal medicine departments who form part of the RICA registry. They were divided into 2 groups: one was followed-up on in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 1,011) and another received conventional care (RICA group, n: 1,390). A total of 753 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were assessed during 12 months of follow-up after an episode of hospitalization due to HF. Results Compared to the RICA group, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF admissions (19.2% versus 36.5%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR]=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.68; p<.001) and mortality (12.6% versus 28%, respectively; HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51; p<.001). There were no differences in hospitalizations for non-HF causes. Conclusions Implementation of the UMIPIC program, which is based on comprehensive continuous care, for patients with HFpEF and a high degree of comorbidity reduces both admissions and mortality in the first year of follow-up (AU)

Benefits of a comprehensive care model in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: The UMIPIC program.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to those with reduced ejection fraction, are older, have more comorbidities, and are not candidates for effective therapeutic measures. Therefore, they are at high risk for hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care program (UMIPIC program) in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data on 2401 patients with HFpEF attended to in internal medicine departments who form part of the RICA registry. They were divided into 2 groups: one was followed-up on in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 1011) and another received conventional care (RICA group, n: 1390). A total of 753 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were assessed during 12 months of follow-up after an episode of hospitalization due to HF. RESULTS: Compared to the RICA group, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF admissions (19.2% versus 36.5%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.68; p < 0.001) and mortality (12.6% versus 28%, respectively; HR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51; p < 0.001). There were no differences in hospitalizations for non-HF causes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the UMIPIC program, which is based on comprehensive continuous care, for patients with HFpEF and a high degree of comorbidity reduces both admissions and mortality in the first year of follow-up.

Beneficios de un modelo asistencial integral en pacientes ancianos con insuficiencia cardíaca y elevada comorbilidad: programa UMIPIC / Morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with heart failure managed with a comprehensive care model vs. usual care: The UMIPIC program

Antecedentes: Los pacientes ancianos con insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) presentan una elevada comorbilidad que conlleva una atención fragmentada, con frecuentes hospitalizaciones y alta mortalidad. En este estudio se evaluó el beneficio de un modelo asistencial caracterizado por una atención integral y continuada (programa UMIPIC), en pacientes con IC de edad avanzada. Métodos y resultados: Se analizaron prospectivamente 2.862 pacientes con IC atendidos en servicios de Medicina Interna, procedentes del registro RICA. Se dividieron en 2 grupos: uno en seguimiento en el programa UMIPIC (grupo UMIPIC, n: 809) y otro atendido de forma convencional (grupo RICA, n: 2053). Se evaluaron los reingresos por IC durante 12 meses de seguimiento y la mortalidad total tras un episodio de hospitalización por IC. Los pacientes del grupo UMIPIC tuvieron más edad, comorbilidades y fracción de eyección preservada que los del grupo RICA. Sin embargo, el grupo UMIPIC tuvo una menor tasa de reingresos por IC (17 frente a 26%, p<0,001) y de mortalidad (16 frente a 27%, respectivamente, p<0,001). Se seleccionaron por emparejamiento (propensity score matching) 370 pacientes de cada grupo, manteniéndose las diferencias en reingresos por IC (15% UMIPIC frente a 30% RICA; hazard ratio [HR]=0,44; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,32-0,60; p<0,001) y mortalidad (17% UMIPIC frente a 28% RICA; hazard ratio=0,58; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0,42-0,79; p=0,001). Conclusiones: La implantación del programa UMIPIC, basado en una atención integral y continuada a pacientes ancianos con IC y elevada comorbilidad, disminuye significativamente los reingresos por IC y la mortalidad total (AU)

Background: Elderly patients with heart failure (HF) have a high degree of comorbidity which leads to fragmented care, with frequent hospitalizations and high mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care model (UMIPIC program) in elderly HF patients. Methods and results: We prospectively analyzed data from the RICA registry on 2,862 patients with HF treated in internal medicine departments. They were divided into two groups: one monitored in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 809) and another which received conventional care (RICA group, n: 2.053). We evaluated HF readmissions during 12 months of follow-up and total mortality after episodes of HF hospitalization. UMIPIC patients were older with higher rates of comorbidity and preserved ejection fraction than the RICA group. However, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF readmissions (17% vs. 26%, p<.001) and mortality (16% vs. 27%, respectively; p<.001). In addition, we selected 370 propensity score-matched patients from each group and the differences in HF readmissions (15% UMIPIC vs. 30% RICA; hazard ratio [HR]=0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.60; p<.001) and mortality (17% UMIPIC vs. 28% RICA; hazard ratio=0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.79; p=.001) were maintained. Conclusions: The implementation of the UMIPIC program, based on comprehensive continuous care of elderly patients with HF and high comorbidity, markedly reduce HF readmissions and total mortality (AU)

Morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with heart failure managed with a comprehensive care model vs. usual care: The UMIPIC program.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with heart failure (HF) have a high degree of comorbidity which leads to fragmented care, with frequent hospitalizations and high mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care model (UMIPIC program) in elderly HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively analyzed data from the RICA registry on 2862 patients with HF treated in internal medicine departments. They were divided into two groups: one monitored in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 809) and another which received conventional care (RICA group, n: 2.053). We evaluated HF readmissions during 12 months of follow-up and total mortality after episodes of HF hospitalization. UMIPIC patients were older with higher rates of comorbidity and preserved ejection fraction than the RICA group. However, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF readmissions (17% vs. 26%, p < .001) and mortality (16% vs. 27%, respectively; p < .001). In addition, we selected 370 propensity score-matched patients from each group and the differences in HF readmissions (15% UMIPIC vs. 30% RICA; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.60; p < .001) and mortality (17% UMIPIC vs. 28% RICA; hazard ratio = 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.79; p = .001) were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the UMIPIC program, based on comprehensive continuous care of elderly patients with HF and high comorbidity, markedly reduce HF readmissions and total mortality.