On the rocks: can urologists identify stone composition based on endoscopic images alone? A worldwide survey of urologists.

PURPOSE: As part of the management of nephrolithiasis, determination of chemical composition of stones is important. Our objective in this study is to assess urologists' accuracy in making visual, intraoperative determinations of stone composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a REDCap survey asking urologists to predict stone composition based on intraoperative images of 10 different pure-composition kidney stones of 7 different types: calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD), calcium phosphate (CP) apatite, CP brushite, uric acid (UA), struvite (ST) and cystine (CY). To evaluate experience, we examined specific endourologic training, years of experience, and number of ureteroscopy (URS) cases/week. A self-assessment of ability to identify stone composition was also required. RESULTS: With a response rate of 26% (366 completed surveys out of 1,370 deliveries), the overall accuracy of our cohort was 44%. COM, ST, and COD obtained the most successful identification rates (65.9%, 55.7%, and 52.0%, respectively). The most frequent misidentified stones were CP apatite (10.7%) and CY (14.2%). Predictors of increased overall accuracy included self-perceived ability to determine composition and number of ureteroscopies per week, while years of experience did not show a positive correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Although endoscopic stone recognition can be an important tool for surgeons, it is not reliable enough to be utilized as a single method for stone identification, suggesting that urologists need to refine their ability to successfully recognize specific stone compositions intraoperatively.

Ureteroscopic Performance of High Power Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser for the Treatment of Urolithiasis: Results of the First Case Series in North America.

OBJECTIVE: To report the first case series of ureterorenoscopy in North America using the High Power Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a multicentric retrospective chart review of patients treated with the High Power Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser from October 2019 to March 2020 was conducted. Basic demographic information, pre-operative, and peri-operative data were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included with a mean age of 60.9 ± 13.3 years. 118 stones were treated including 32 within the ureter, 49 in the lower pole, 37 in mid or upper poles. Dusting technique was commonly used (67.1%) with pulse frequencies up to 2400 Hz. Mean operative time was 59.4 ± 31.5 minutes. Mean laser time and total laser energy were 10.8 ± 14.1 minutes and 12.5 ± 19.1 KJ, respectively. Intraoperative complications were limited to 7 grade 1, 3 grade 2, and 1 grade 3 ureteral injuries and one case of renal collecting system bleeding that was adequately managed with laser coagulation settings (1J-20Hz). CONCLUSION: This initial case series in North America of the High Power Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser is promising for the treatment of urolithiasis. Sub-200 µm fibers and dusting settings up to 2400 Hz were utilized successfully. No specific complications related to use of the laser were seen.

Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).

PURPOSE: The holmium-YAG (Ho:YAG) Laser system is the current gold standard for laser lithotripsy (LL). Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser (SPTF) has emerged as an effective alternative. We compared the temperature profile of both the 120 W Ho:YAG and the 60 W SPTF systems during ureteral lithotripsy. METHODS: Antegrade ureteroscopy with LL was performed in ex-vivo porcine kidneys with 3 mm Begostones. Intra-ureteral temperature was measured using one probe proximal and one distal to the site of lithotripsy. LL was performed using a 200 µm core fiber at dusting (SPTF-0.1 J, 200 Hz, SP; Ho:YAG-0.3 J, 70 Hz, LP) and fragmenting (0.8 J, 8 Hz, SP for both) settings for 5 s. Fifteen repetitions were recorded for each laser at each setting. Tissue samples of the ureter were collected for histological analysis. RESULTS: There was a rise in temperature at the site of lithotripsy using both systems at every setting evaluated. The median temperatures were greater for the SPTF on the fragmenting setting (33.3 °C vs 30.0 °C, p = 0.004). On the dusting setting, the median temperature was not statistically greater for Ho:YAG (40.6 °C vs 35.8 °C, p = 0.064), (Graphic 1). Histological analysis did not show any signs of injury or necrosis in any of the tested settings. CONCLUSION: Higher power settings used for dusting have a higher temperature rise in the ureter during lasering. Median ureteral intra-luminal temperature rise during LL was equivalent during dusting and higher in the SPTF during fragmentation, but neither reached the threshold for thermal injury based on the duration of exposure.

Stone size on endoscopic view as a predictor of successful stone retrieval during flexible ureteroscopy: an in vitro analysis.

PURPOSE: Basketing plays an important role during flexible ureteroscopy, but it can be time-consuming, especially when fragments are too large to pass through the ureteral access sheath. We aim to present the optimal on-screen, endoscopic stone size that predicts successful basketing through various access sheaths. METHODS: A tipless basket, individually extended to 5 mm from multiple ureteroscopes: (Flex-Xc, Karl Storz; Flex-X2s, Karl Storz; LithoVue, Boston Scientific; or URF-P6R, Olympus) and via differently sized access sheaths (10-12 Fr through 13-15 Fr), was used in retrieval attempts of various artificial stone sizes (2 mm through 5 mm). A relative endoscopic stone size was recorded as the stone's maximum diameter on endoscopic view compared to the total image diameter. RESULTS: Basketing of stones up to 2.5 mm, yielding relative endoscopic stone sizes of 0.38 (Flex-Xc), 0.30 (Flex-X2s), 0.32 (LithoVue), and 0.34 (URF-P6R), was successful using all access sheaths. Only the 12-14 Fr and greater sheaths allowed for successful basketing of 3 mm stones. Larger stones did not successfully pass through any of the access sheaths. CONCLUSION: Successful stone retrieval can be predicted by estimating the stone's size on screen, which is influenced by the type of flexible ureteroscope and access sheath. In our testing, stones of approximately one-third of the screen size passed successfully in all cases.

Utilization of MOSES Modulated Pulse Mode Results in Improved Efficiency in Holmium:YAG Laser Ablation of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if MOSES technology improves efficiency and short-term outcomes in holmium laser ablation of the prostate (HoLAP). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLAP between August 2016 and November 2019 was conducted. All procedures before and after the implementation of MOSES technology at our institution were evaluated. Preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative data were collected. Postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, and postvoid residual measurements at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively were analyzed. RESULTS: This cohort included 65 males who underwent HoLAP, 32 without and 33 with MOSES. Patients in the MOSES group were slightly older, but no other differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. Ablation time was similar at 49.6 ± 26.1 minutes without and 40.7 ± 41.2 minutes with MOSES (P = .38). However, HoLAP with MOSES had significantly higher ablation efficiency (0.59 ± 0.24 g/min without vs 0.86 0.5 g/min with MOSES, P = .01). On multivariable regression modeling, HoLAP without MOSES added 12 minutes to operating time (estimate 12.3, standard error 3.44, P < .01) after controlling for prostate size and laser energy usage. Duration of catheterization, urinary incontinence and need for reoperation within 3 months were similar. There were no differences between groups in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, or postvoid residual at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Utilization of MOSES technology resulted in improved efficiency in HoLAP, translating into time savings in the operating room. Postoperative outcomes out to 3 months were similar among patients who underwent the procedure utilizing either laser pulse mode. Further studies are needed to investigate long-term outcomes as the use of MOSES is likely to become more commonly utilized.

COVID-19 pandemic impact on clinical outcomes of patients with obstructive pyelonephritis.

PURPOSE: Obstructive pyelonephritis is a common urologic emergency that requires prompt decompression of the collecting system. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed patient flow and healthcare strategies at numerous emergency departments across Brazil with still unknown consequences for the population. This study sought to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on clinical outcomes in patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis at a tertiary academic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review of patients who required decompression of the collecting system due to acute obstructive pyelonephritis from June 2019 to July 2020 was conducted. Basic demographic information, pre-operative, and peri-operative data were recorded. Patients were assigned in "Pre-Covid" and "Post-Covid" groups based on the admission dates. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were included, with 40 patients in the Pre-Covid group and 23 in the Post-Covid group. Patients from the Post-Covid group presented at the ER later after symptoms onset (7.8 vs. 4.3 days; p = 0.012), had higher rates of SIRS (57% vs. 25%; p = 0.012), perirenal abscesses (13% vs. 0%; p = 0.019), overall complications (p = 0.047) and presented longer hospital length of stay (7.6 vs. 3.8; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis presented later for evaluation at the ER, had higher disease severity and longer hospital length of stay when compared to the pre-COVID group of patients with the same pathology.