Tailored medical and interventional therapy against recurrent stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stenting.

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (ticlopidine or clopidogrel) has strikingly improved the results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through a marked reduction in the rate of stent thrombosis (ST). Emerging data suggest that resistance to antiplatelet treatment may be a risk factor for ST. We report about a patient, aspirin and clopidogrel poor responder, who experienced 4 ST in 10 days. After the second ST, during antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (100 mg/die) and clopidogrel (75 mg/die), the patient's platelet function was investigated with Platelet Function Analyzer 100, VerifyNow P2Y12 System and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). High platelet reactivity and combined resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel were found, and, as a consequence, treatment was switched to clopidogrel 150 mg and aspirin 300 mg/die. In spite of this adjustment, the third ST occurred. Poor responsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel was still confirmed. Because of combined clopidogrel and aspirin resistance and to unsuccessful PCI treatment, a single coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was planned. Awaiting surgery, 3 days later, the fourth ST occurred. It is angiographically confirmed and thus, CABG was performed. After CABG, in chronic treatment with aspirin (300 mg/die) and ticlopidine (500 mg/die), no bleeding complications occurred and the patient did not experience recurrent ischemia (2 years follow-up). A better platelet inhibition by ticlopidine than that obtained by clopidogrel was observed. Our case report remarks the importance to identify these poor responder patients as the treatment can be tailored with alternative therapeutic options (ticlopidine, prasugrel, warfarin) and/or different revascularization strategies (CABG).

Radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by mesh catheter.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary veins isolation usually requires a multielectrode catheter for mapping in addition to the ablation catheter. We describe our experience with a new multipolar catheter designed for simultaneous mapping and ablation (MESH, Bard). METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested the catheter in 15 patients (mean age 61.1 +/- 7.9; eight men) scheduled for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation. The catheter was positioned in front of the pulmonary vein ostia. A pulmonary vein potential was demonstrated in 63.5% of the veins, which were disconnected with a mean of 1.6 radiofrequency applications with a mean time of 351 +/- 125.8 s (range 180-650) for each vein. Mean procedural time was 93 +/- 17.1 min (range 65-120), and fluoroscopy time was 13.7 +/- 4.0 (range 5-15) min. No complications occurred during and after or procedures. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary veins disconnection with MESH ablator catheter is feasible with short procedural and X-ray exposure time. Further studies are needed to compare this new device to standard multipolar mapping catheters in order to evaluate its ability to correctly identify pulmonary vein potentials and to compare its safety and efficacy.