Outcomes of Using Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent for Percutaneous Treatment of Access-Site Vascular Injury after Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Access-site vascular injury (ASVI) remains a challenge for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although surgery is the gold standard, endovascular therapy gains growing acceptance as primary treatment option for ASVI. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of covered balloon-expandable stents (BXSs) placement for ASVI after transfemoral TAVI. METHODS: All patients treated with a covered BXS between January 2018 and December 2020 for access-site related bleeding complications following femoral TAVI were included in this single center retrospective study. Primary measure outcome of this study was the primary patency at 12 months. Technical success, limb clinical worsening and device related complications were additionally analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, 576 percutaneous femoral TAVIs were performed. Of these, 36 patients (6%) underwent covered stent deployment for a femoral access-site complication (19 men, median age 83 years old). Procedural success was 97%. The median follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 9.7, range 0-36 months). One patient was lost to follow-up. The primary patency rates at 6 and 12 months were 100% and 95% respectively. No clinical deterioration or stent fracture was described during this period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that covered BXS deployment is a safe and effective alternative to surgery and may be a promising option for treating ASVI after femoral TAVI.

Common femoral artery endarterectomy by eversion versus prosthetic patch angioplasty: a propensity-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Endarterectomy with prosthetic patch angioplasty is the preferred treatment for common femoral artery occlusive disease. Eversion endarterectomy was described as a promising alternative. the aim of this study was to compare the eversion endarterectomy and patch angioplasty outcomes for patients with de novo femoral bifurcation atherosclerotic lesions. this study was a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data, non-randomized cohort. Patients treated by eversion endarterectomy and patch angioplasty for de novo femoral bifurcation atheromatous lesions were evaluated. METHODS: Between January 2016 and June 2019, all patients with de novo femoral bifurcation atheromatous lesions with a stenosis ≥70% were included in a prospective single-center database. Patients undergoing eversion endarterectomy and patch angioplasty were propensity-matched by age, sex, preexisting comorbidities, and lesion characteristics. RESULTS: There were 51 eversion endarterectomy and 137 patch angioplasty cases. One-to-one propensity matching yielded 51 pairs of patients. In the matched population, intermittent claudication was the most common clinical presentation (68% for both groups; P=0.83). There was no difference in femoral bifurcation lesion types between the two groups (P=0.11). Univariate analysis found no significant difference between the groups in terms of 30-d morbidity and mortality (10% and 16%; P=0.55). At 24 months, there was no significant difference in primary sustained clinical improvement (72% and 86%; P=0.22), primary patency rate (90% and 98%; P=0.48), and freedom from target lesion revascularization (100% and 98%; P=0.31) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This propensity-score analysis did not show any advantage for the EE. The EPPA should be the first line treatment of de novo femoral tripod occlusive disease. Results show that patch angioplasty treatment for de novo femoral bifurcation atheromatous could improve the daily practice with a good clinical improvement and primary patency.

Perioperative adverse events in percutaneous versus open brachial access.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the incidence of complications at the access site after percutaneous brachial access (PBA) and open brachial access (OBA) in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: From November 2016 to November 2021, all patients who had undergone peripheral artery revascularization with brachial access were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day rate of postoperative complications at the access site. The complications included hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, and pseudoaneurysms that had resulted in prolonged hospitalization and/or reintervention. RESULTS: Overall, 259 procedures with brachial access had been performed (PBA, n = 101; OBA, n = 158). The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The sheath size was larger for the OBA procedures. Complications had occurred in 11 of 101 patients (11.1%) in the PBA group and 5 of 158 patients (3.2%) in the OBA group (P = .01). The mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter for the PBA group (73.5 ± 46.5 minutes vs 101.2 ± 60.8 minutes; P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who had undergone brachial access for peripheral vascular disease, the rate of access site-related complications was significantly lower for the patients who had undergone open access compared with that for the patients who had undergone percutaneous access.

Stent Size Optimization in the Femoral Bifurcation Using a Fractal Model: A Morphological Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Stenting of common femoral artery (CFA) bifurcation lesions is complex due to harmonious asymmetric geometry between the CFA and deep or superficial femoral artery. In order to ensure an optimal flow, the stents must be implanted according to the diameter of the CFA and the diameter of the daughter vessels. The aim of this study was to validate a mathematical formula for the CFA bifurcation in order to optimize the implantation of stents in this bifurcation with a fast and efficient method. MATERIALS/METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation and who had a healthy CFA bifurcation on the CT-scan. Diameters of the mother vessel (Dm), daughter vessels (Dl: larger vessel; Ds: smaller vessel), and the ratio between the two were calculated. According to the latter, the following linear model was proposed: [Dm = (Dm/Dl + Ds) × (Dl + Ds)] and was compared to the four existing models (Murray, HK, Flow, Finet). Finally, we calculated the relative error between the prediction of the four models and the measurements. RESULTS: Overall, 110 CFA bifurcations were included. Mean CFA diameter was 7.75 ± 1.67 mm. Mean Dl diameter was 5.79 ± 1.21 mm and mean Ds diameter was 5.23 ± 1.09 mm. A reduction of 25 % was seen between the CFA and the larger daughter-vessel. The mean ratio between the CFA and the daughter vessels was 0.71. Our model [Dm = 0.71× (Dl + Ds)] and the flow law were the most accurate (relative difference of 1.59 ± 11.97% and 1.01 ± 11.94%, respectively). However, Murray's law had a statistically significant deviation from the real mother-vessel diameter (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple fractal ratio between CFA and daughter vessels, which could be easily used in daily practice during CFA percutaneous reconstruction to identify the optimal diameters of the diseased vessels.