Cellular immune response after vaccination with Salmonella Gallinarum 9R in laying hens and addition of aflatoxin and absorbent in the feed.

Salmonella Gallinarum greatly impacts commercial flocks and vaccination with S. Gallinarum 9R (SG9R) is one of the most effective control strategies in some countries. However, mycotoxins can affect immunization success. Herein, we measured the cellular immune response in SG9R-vaccinated hens, quantified the impact of aflatoxins on the immune response, and determined whether the anti-mycotoxin additive (adsorbent) influences immunity after vaccination. One-day-old chicks of commercial laying hens were raised until 49 days of age and were assigned to six groups. T1 (control group): control diet (no detectable concentration of aflatoxin), no vaccine or adsorbent. T2: vaccine SG-9R at day 28, aflatoxins 2.5 ppm from day 1 to day 49, and adsorbent 2.5 Kg/ton. T3: control diet and vaccine. T4: aflatoxins and vaccine. T5: control diet and aflatoxins. T6: aflatoxins and adsorbent. Body weights were evaluated on days 1, 31, and 41. Cellular immune response was evaluated by flow cytometry at 31, 41, and 49 days of age. T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, monocytes, phagocytic monocytes and heterophils were evaluated. Aflatoxins suppressed peripheral and mucosal helper T lymphocytes, and mucosal cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vaccinated birds (T2 and T4). However, inclusion of the adsorbent in the feed of vaccinated birds neutralized the effects of aflatoxin (T6). The concentration of immune cells may show differences after SG9R vaccination, particularly an increase in the monocyte concentration. The SG9R vaccine reduced the concentration of activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes, making this marker a good parameter to analyze before and three weeks after immunization.

Electrochemically-Activated Water Presents Bactericidal Effect Against Salmonella Heidelberg Isolated from Poultry Origin.

Salmonella spp. are among the most important pathogens in poultry farming, and Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) is one of the most frequent serotypes isolated in Brazil. SH has a zoonotic potential and stands out as a pathogen that is difficult to eliminate from the poultry chain due to its resistance to disinfectants. One alternative to traditional disinfectants is the electrochemically-activated water (ECA), a bactericidal compound produced from the electrolysis of salt and water. ECA generators produce a compound that consists of free chlorine, hypochlorous acid, and other free radicals. This alternative control method is safe for human health and reduces environmental contamination. The present study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of ECA against 30 SH isolates from poultry origin in scenarios that simulated the chiller environment (4°C, 5 and 50 parts per million [ppm], 5 and 40 min of exposure) and the cleaning and disinfection process (25°C, 200 ppm, 5 and 10 min of exposure). In the quantitative test, SH was susceptible to ECA. The mean bacterial counts decreased significantly compared to the control group, especially at 200 ppm. At this concentration, ECA inhibited the growth of almost 87% of the Salmonella strains, and the results showed a significant decrease in the mean bacterial counts for both exposure times (5 and 10 min). These findings demonstrate that ECA is effective against SH in vitro and it is a possible alternative to disinfection in the poultry industry for the control of this pathogen. However, in situ tests in the food industry are needed.