Hereditary coagulation factor XI deficiency: a rare or neglected disease? Results from a retrospective, single-centre cohort in northern Italy.

To examine real-life clinical data regarding hereditary factor XI (FXI) deficiency from a secondary care centre. Retrospective review of clinical records for every FXI:C 0.7 IU/ml or less reported from 2012 to 2020. Seventy-nine patients were included. Six (7.6%) had a severe deficiency (FXI:C <0.2 IU/ml). Only 55 (69.6%) patients were referred to the Haemostasis Centre. Among them, six (15%) were subsequently not identified at increased haemorrhagic risk before a surgical/obstetrical procedure. Thirty-three (41.8%) experienced at least one bleeding event, minor (25 patients) and/or major (16 patients). Minor bleedings were predominantly spontaneous and more frequent in women, major events were mainly provoked. No correlation was found between FXI:C and risk of bleeding ( P  = 0.9153). Lower FXI:C, but not a positive bleeding history, was related with higher likelihood of being referred to the Haemostasis Centre ( P  = 0.0333). Hereditary FXI deficiency prevalence is likely underestimated, real-life clinical practices outside reference centres could be suboptimal.

Four cases of acquired hemophilia A following immunization with mRNA BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease caused by neutralizing autoantibodies against coagulation Factor VIII. Immunomodulatory effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are still poorly understood, with reports of immune-mediated conditions developing after immunization. In the province of Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy, we observed four cases of AHA following SARS-CoV-2 immunization with mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (produced by Pfizer-BioNTech) during the first eight months from the beginning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign. During this time frame, 235,597 people received at least one dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. The total population of Reggio Emilia province is 526,349. The unusual observation of four cases of AHA in our province could be of interest and could sensitize healthcare personnel toward a possible complication of SARS-Cov-2 immunization. Nonetheless, vaccination benefits exceed potential side effects and play a central role in individual and public health to effectively protect people from COVID-19 and to stop the pandemic.

Prulifloxacin vs Levofloxacin for Exacerbation of COPD after Failure of Other Antibiotics.

The chronic course and evolution of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often characterized by periods of exacerbation of symptoms, which have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients, as well as on the evolution of COPD, and represent a significant cause of medical intervention and hospitalization. Very few data are available on the efficacy of rescue antibiotics in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) unresponsive to previous treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two fluoroquinolones in AECOPD previously treated without success. The FADOI-FLOR study is a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority comparison between levofloxacin and prulifloxacin. Primary end-point was "therapeutic success" at Day 10 of treatment, defined as disappearance of signs/symptoms or decrease of at least three points of a global score of symptomatology (maximum score = 15). 258 patients were enrolled (128 levofloxacin and 130 prulifloxacin), in 25 centers. A very high proportion of patients in the two groups had therapeutic success at Day-10 (levofloxacin 93.0% vs prulifloxacin 96.7%, population intention-to-treat; 94.6% vs 99.1%, population per-protocol). Earlier therapeutic success (within 7 days) was achieved in 32.0% and 36.2% of patients receiving levofloxacin or prulifloxacin, respectively. At 3-month follow-up, re-exacerbations occurred in 17.8% of patients treated with levofloxacin and 14.2% of those receiving prulifloxacin (p = 0.44). In conclusion, fluoroquinolones are very effective in the treatment of AECOPD resistant to other antibiotics.