Does the difference in donor and recipient weight influence renal graft survival?

INTRODUCTION: Grafts from older donors or those in recipients with a greater body mass index (BMI) as compared with the donor may develop hyperfiltration syndrome that shortens renal graft survival. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the differences in weight and BMI between donor and recipient correlated with renal function, proteinuria, or graft survival among recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a prospective, observational study in 180 recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors performed between 1999 and 2006. All grafts had been biopsied previously for viability. The recipients underwent immunosuppression with basiliximab, late introduction of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. The study population was divided into three groups, depending on the tertile of the donor-to-recipient weight ratio (<1, n=64; 1-1.2, n=56; >1.2, n=60), and the donor-to-recipient BMI ratio (<0.97, n=59; 0.97-1.13, n=60; >1.13, n=60). The glomerular filtration rate was estimated from the modified diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. RESULTS: The mean age of the donors was 63.54 years and of the recipients, 58.38 years. The proportion of male-to-female donors was 52:48 and recipients 57.8:42.2 (P=NS). No significant differences in overall graft survival were observed between the tertiles. There was a negative correlation between the donor-to-recipient weight ratio and serum creatinine value at 1 (P<.001), 3 (P=.013), and 12 months (P=.005) after transplantation, and a positive correlation with the MDRD at 1 month (P<.001). No relation was noted between weight and proteinuria at 1 (P=.25), 3 (P=.51), or 12 months (P=.90). The results were similar after analyzing the ratio of the BMI to creatinine, MDRD or proteinuria, as well as in cases of a female donor to a male recipient. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in weights between the donor and the recipient did not appear to affect graft survival or proteinuria among patients receiving grafts from expanded criteria donors, though it may be related to renal function during the early posttransplant stages.

Update on the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies.

A general review of advances in the treatment of Primary Immunodeficiencies (PID) has been performed. Treatment with immunoglobulins is indicated in cases of humoral immunodeficiencies and in selected cases of combined immunodeficiencies. The use of intramuscular immunoglobulins in the treatment of PID was abandoned after obtaining the intravenous immunoglobulins, since these are much more effective and have fewer adverse effects. Now subcutaneous immunoglobulins are also available. Immunoglobulins help to keep the patients free of symptoms and infections as these substances are able to neutralise infectious agents, modulate and promote the immune response and favour phagocytosis. Adverse effects have been reported in 5-15 % of patients receiving IVIg, and patients with deficiencies of subclasses of IgG with IgA deficiency and/or anti-IgA antibodies are at risk of severe reactions. No severe adverse effects of subcutaneous immuneglobulins have been reported and the medication can be self-administered. The efficacy and safety of IVIg and SCIg are similar and SCIg administered at home is associated with better quality of life. Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) in Primary Immunodeficiencies is aimed at restoring the number and/or function of lymphocytes or phagocytes. Matched, related or unrelated donors, or related haploidentical donors are selected. HLA class II mismatched unrelated donors are avoided owing to the risk of severe graft versus host disease (GVHD). Stem cells are obtained from bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral blood. Prophylactic immunossupression (as well as donor T lymphocyte depletion in haploidentical and unrelated donors) is performed to avoid or minimize GVHD. Less toxic "reduced intensity" protocols now exist for pre-transplantation conditioning, indicated to avoid graft rejection if there is residual T-lymphocyte immunity in the host. In the majority of Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies (SCID), SCT results in T lymphocytes graft and the antibody immunodeficiency persists in many cases. The results are better the earlier it is performed, with the absence of previous infections, and with the degree of matching. The patient must be maintained in a laminar flow room with broad anti-infectious prophylaxis and with the intravenous administration of gammaglobulin for a variable period. Many other complications can be expected. Gene therapy. Patients with PID are ideal candidates, as they are monogenic, the haematopoietic cells are easily obtained and virus replication is easy within them. Vectors (viruses) "infect" the stem cells of the patient's bone marrow, producing the transfection of the wild (healthy) gene in these cells. Encouraging results have been achieved in X-linked SCID as there are a number of patients who are considered "cured", although neoplastic processes have occurred due to the activation of proto-oncogenes close to the point of insertion of the external gene, using retroviruses as vectors; there are now trials with adenovirus, physical methods (direct injection...) and chemical methods (viral modification, artificial viruses...). Gene therapy has also been performed in patients with Chronic Granulomatous Disease and trials will improve in the future with changes in protocols used in oncology and infectious diseases.