EEG source estimation accuracy in presence of simulated cortical lesions.

Methods to reconstruct the neuroelectrical activity in the brain source space can be used to improve the spatial resolution of scalp-recorded EEG and to estimate the locations of electrical sources in the brain. This procedure can improve the investigation of the functional organization of the human brain, exploiting the high temporal resolution of EEG to follow the temporal dynamics of information processing. As for today, the uncertainties about the effects of inhomogeneities due to brain lesions preclude the adoption of EEG functional mapping on patients with lesioned brain. The aim of this work is to quantify the accuracy of a distributed source localization method in recovering extended sources of activated cortex when cortical lesions of different dimensions are introduced in simulated data. For this purpose, EEG source-distributed activity estimated from real data was modified including silent lesion areas. Then, for each simulated lesion, forward and inverse calculations were carried out to localize the produced scalp activity and the reconstructed cortical activity. Finally, the error induced in the reconstruction by the presence of the lesion was computed and analyzed in relation to the number of electrodes and to the size of the simulated lesion. Results returned values of global error in the whole cortex and of error in the non-lesioned area which are strongly dependent on the number of recorded scalp sensors, as they increase when a lower spatial sampling is performed on the scalp (64 versus 32 EEG channels). For increasing spatial sampling frequencies, the accuracy of the source reconstruction improves and even the presence of small lesions induces significantly higher error levels with respect to the lesion-free condition.

Measuring the agreement between brain connectivity networks.

Investigating the level of similarity between two brain networks, resulting from measures of effective connectivity in the brain, can be of interest from many respects. In this study, we propose and test the idea to borrow measures of association used in machine learning to provide a measure of similarity between the structure of (un-weighted) brain connectivity networks. The measures here explored are the accuracy, Cohen's Kappa (K) and Area Under Curve (AUC). We implemented two simulation studies, reproducing two contexts of application that can be particularly interesting for practical applications, namely: i) in methodological studies, performed on surrogate data, aiming at comparing the estimated network with the corresponding ground-truth network; ii) in applications to real data, when it is necessary to compare the structure of a network obtained in a specific subject with a reference (e.g. a baseline condition or normative data). In the simulations, the level of similarity between two networks was manipulated through different factors. We then investigated the effect of such manipulations on the measures of association. Results showed how the three parameters modulated their values according to the level of similarity between the two networks. In particular, the AUC provided the better performances in terms of its capability to synthetize the similarity between two networks, showing high dynamic and sensitivity.

Effect of inter-trials variability on the estimation of cortical connectivity by Partial Directed Coherence.

Partial Directed Coherence (PDC) is a powerful estimator of effective connectivity. In neuroscience it is used in different applications with the aim to investigate the communication between brain regions during the execution of different motor or cognitive tasks. When multiple trials are available, PDC can be computed over multiple realizations, provided that the assumption of stationarity across trials is verified. This allows to improve the amount of data, which is an important constraint for the estimation accuracy. However, the stationarity of the data across trials is not always guaranteed, especially when dealing with patients. In this study we investigated how the inter-trials variability of an EEG dataset affects the PDC accuracy. Effects of density variations and of changes of connectivity values across trials were first investigated with a simulation study and then tested on real EEG data collected from two post-stroke patients during a motor imagery task and characterized by different inter-trials variability. Results showed the effect of different factors on the PDC accuracy and the robustness of such estimator in a range of conditions met in practical applications.