Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage in male rectal cancer surgery (GRECCAR10), a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Bladder drainage is systematically used in rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal type of drainage, transurethral catheterization (TUC) or suprapubic catheterization (SPC), is still controversial. The aim was to compare the rates of urinary tract infection on the fourth postoperative day (POD4) between TUC and SPC, after rectal cancer surgery regardless of the day of removal of the urinary drain. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial in 19 expert colorectal surgery centers in France and Belgium was performed between October 2016 and October 2019 and included 240 men (with normal or subnormal voiding function) undergoing mesorectal excision with low anastomosis for rectal cancer. Patients were followed at postoperative days 4, 30, and 180. RESULTS: In 208 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 58-71]) randomized to TUC (n = 99) or SPC (n = 109), the rate of urinary infection at POD4 was not significantly different whatever the type of drainage (11/99 (11.1%) vs. 8/109 (7.3%), 95% CI, - 4.2% to 11.7%; p = 0.35). There was significantly more pyuria in the TUC group (79/99 (79.0%) vs. (60/109 (60.9%), 95% CI, 5.7-30.0%; p = 0.004). No difference in bacteriuria was observed between the groups. Patients in the TUC group had a shorter duration of catheterization (median 4 [2-5] vs. 4 [3-5] days; p = 0.002). Drainage complications were more frequent in the SPC group at all followup visits. CONCLUSIONS: TUC should be preferred over SPC in male patients undergoing surgery for mid and/or lower rectal cancers, owing to the lower rate of complications and shorter duration of catheterization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02922647.

Incidence and prevention of infective endocarditis and bacteraemia after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a French university hospital: a retrospective study.

Infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rare but severe complication. Among 326 patients who underwent TAVI at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, six (1.8%) cases of IE and 11 (3.4%) cases of bacteraemia were identified. No cases of IE were linked to the intervention; one was due to Staphylococcus aureus despite a screening and targeted decolonization strategy. This underscores the need for randomized studies to evaluate the benefit and cost-effectiveness of this policy.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of fluoroquinolone resistance associated with DNA gyrase mutations in Francisella tularensis, including in tularaemia patients with treatment failure.

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are highly effective for treating tularaemia, a zoonosis caused by Francisella tularensis, but failures and relapses remain common in patients with treatment delay or immunocompromised status. FQ-resistant strains of F. tularensis harboring mutations in the quinolone-resistance determining region (QRDR) of gyrA and gyrB, the genes encoding subunits A and B of DNA gyrase, have been selected in vitro. Such mutants have never been isolated from humans as this microorganism is difficult to culture. In this study, the presence of FQ-resistant mutants of F. tularensis was assessed in tularaemia patients using combined culture- and PCR-based approaches. We analyzed 42 F. tularensis strains and 82 tissue samples collected from 104 tularaemia cases, including 32 (30.7%) with FQ treatment failure or relapse. Forty F. tularensis strains and 55 clinical samples were obtained before any FQ treatment, while 2 strains and 15 tissue samples were collected after treatment. FQ resistance was evaluated by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the bacterial strains, and by newly developed PCR-based methods targeting the gyrA and gyrB QRDRs for both the bacterial strains and the clinical samples. None of the F. tularensis strains displayed an increased MIC compared with FQ-susceptible controls. Neither gyrA nor gyrB QRDR mutation was found in bacterial strains and tissue samples tested, including those from patients with FQ treatment failure or relapse. Further phenotypic and genetic resistance traits should be explored to explain the poor clinical response to FQ treatment in such tularaemia patients.