Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Mol Diagn ; 23(7): 788-795, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957320

RESUMO

The clinical performance of saliva compared with nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) has shown conflicting results in healthcare and community settings. In the present study, a total of 429 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs, collected in either healthcare or community setting, were evaluated. Phase-1 (protocol U) tested 240 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs; phase 2 (SalivaAll protocol) tested 189 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs, with an additional sample homogenization step before RNA extraction. A total of 85 saliva samples were evaluated with both protocols. In phase-1, 28.3% (68/240) samples tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from saliva, NPS, or both. The detection rate from saliva was lower compared with that from NPS samples (50.0% versus 89.7%). In phase-2, 50.2% (95/189) samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from saliva, NPS, or both. The detection rate from saliva was higher compared with that from NPS samples (97.8% versus 78.9%). Of the 85 saliva samples evaluated with both protocols, the detection rate was 100% for samples tested with SalivaAll, and 36.7% with protocol U. The limit of detection with SalivaAll protocol was 20 to 60 copies/mL. The pooled testing approach demonstrated a 95% positive and 100% negative percentage agreement. This protocol for saliva samples results in higher sensitivity compared with NPS samples and breaks the barrier to using pooled saliva for SARS-CoV-2 testing.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Atenção à Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Características de Residência , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Saliva/virologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Georgia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Limite de Detecção , RNA Viral/genética , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Biosecur Bioterror ; 10(4): 346-71, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23244500

RESUMO

This article summarizes major points from a newly released guide published online by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). The article reviews basic principles about radiation and its measurement, short-term and long-term effects of radiation, and medical countermeasures as well as essential information about how to prepare for and respond to a nuclear detonation. A link is provided to the manual itself, which in turn is heavily referenced for readers who wish to have more detail.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Planejamento em Desastres , Guerra Nuclear , Vigilância da População , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Defesa Civil/educação , Abrigo de Emergência , Humanos , Agências Internacionais , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Radiometria , Transporte de Pacientes , Triagem , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...