RESUMO
In this paper, the author, a historian, describes the challenges he encountered as he sought to turn the Farm Hall event and its surviving transcripts into a theatrical play. The play, Farm Hall, was produced in New York in 2014 and published in Cassidy 2017. This paper further discusses what the author learned about the nature and elements of a play, how he applied those lessons to his play, and the advantages and disadvantages of this genre for bringing historical events to the general public.
Assuntos
Drama , Fazendas , Humanos , Masculino , New York , RedaçãoRESUMO
Importance: In 2018, the combination of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) levels became the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved blood test to detect intracranial lesions after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (MTBI). How this blood test compares with validated clinical decision rules remains unknown. Objectives: To compare the performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 levels vs 3 validated clinical decision rules for detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) in patients with MTBI and to evaluate combining biomarkers with clinical decision rules. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study from a level I trauma center enrolled adults with suspected MTBI presenting within 4 hours of injury. The clinical decision rules included the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR), New Orleans Criteria (NOC), and National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II (NEXUS II) criteria. Emergency physicians prospectively completed data forms for each clinical decision rule before the patients' CT scans. Blood samples for measuring GFAP and UCH-L1 levels were drawn, but laboratory personnel were blinded to clinical results. Of 2274 potential patients screened, 697 met eligibility criteria, 320 declined to participate, and 377 were enrolled. Data were collected from March 16, 2010, to March 5, 2014, and analyzed on August 11, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The presence of acute traumatic intracranial lesions on head CT scan (positive CT finding). Results: Among enrolled patients, 349 (93%) had a CT scan performed and were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 40 (16) years; 230 patients (66%) were men, 314 (90%) had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, and 23 (7%) had positive CT findings. For the CCHR, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 82%-100%), specificity was 33% (95% CI, 28%-39%), and negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (95% CI, 96%-100%). For the NOC, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 82%-100%), specificity was 16% (95% CI, 12%-20%), and NPV was 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%). For NEXUS II, sensitivity was 83% (95% CI, 60%-94%), specificity was 52% (95% CI, 47%-58%), and NPV was 98% (95% CI, 94%-99%). For GFAP and UCH-L1 levels combined with cutoffs at 67 and 189 pg/mL, respectively, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 82%-100%), specificity was 25% (95% CI, 20%-30%), and NPV was 100%; with cutoffs at 30 and 327 pg/mL, respectively, sensitivity was 91% (95% CI, 70%-98%), specificity was 20% (95% CI, 16%-24%), and NPV was 97%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for GFAP alone was 0.83; for GFAP plus NEXUS II, 0.83; for GFAP plus NOC, 0.85; and for GFAP plus CCHR, 0.88. The AUROC for UCH-L1 alone was 0.72; for UCH-L1 plus NEXUS II, 0.77; for UCH-L1 plus NOC, 0.77; and for UCH-L1 plus CCHR, 0.79. The GFAP biomarker alone (without UCH-L1) contributed the most improvement to the clinical decision rules. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the CCHR, the NOC, and GFAP plus UCH-L1 biomarkers had equally high sensitivities, and the CCHR had the highest specificity. However, using different cutoff values reduced both sensitivity and specificity of GFAP plus UCH-L1. Use of GFAP significantly improved the performance of the clinical decision rules, independently of UCH-L1. Together, the CCHR and GFAP had the highest diagnostic performance.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Canadá , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A likely consequence of the discontinued distribution and sale of the HVAD System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) will be an increase in replacement with the HeartMate 3 (Abbott, Chicago, IL) left ventricular assist device when device exchange is necessary. If part or all of the HVAD 10-mm-diameter outflow graft is retained during replacement, the HeartMate 3 will have to run at a higher speed than it would with its 14-mm-diameter graft. METHODS: A steady-state, in vitro study was run with 250-mm-long samples of HVAD, HeartMate 3, and half-HVAD/half-HeartMate 3 grafts and additionally 125- and 375-mm-long samples of the HVAD graft. Flows of 3.0, 3.9, 4.3, 4.7, and 6.0 L/min were applied to encompass expected clinical conditions. RESULTS: At typical and high flow rates of 4.3 and 6.0 L/min, HeartMate 3 rotor speeds with the full HVAD graft had to be increased relative to those with the HeartMate 3 graft from 5350 to 5700 and 6350 to 6900 rpm, respectively, with power consumption increases from 3.7 to 4.3 W (16%) and 5.5 to 6.8 W (24%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not elucidate a severe consequence of using a remnant HVAD graft during pump exchange, but the incremental risks of a higher rotor speed, disadvantage to the patient in battery runtime, and the general benefit of complete conversion to the HeartMate 3 graft should be balanced against other procedural considerations. Complete graft replacement during HVAD-to-HeartMate 3 conversion remains the preferred approach from an engineering point of view.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , ChicagoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical prediction tools for making decisions in patients with severe urinary tract infections (UTIs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at 2 hospitals (combined emergency department (ED) census 190,000). Study patients were admitted via the ED with acute pyelonephritis or severe sepsis-septic shock related UTI. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) augmented by decision curve analysis and sensitivity of each rule for predicting mortality and ICU admission were compared. RESULTS: The AUROC of PRACTICE was greater than that of BOMBARD (0.15 difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09-0.22), SIRS (0.21 difference, 95% CI = 0.14-0.28) and qSOFA (0.06 difference, 95% CI = 0-0.11) for predicting mortality. PRACTICE had a greater net benefit compared to BOMBARD and SIRS at all thresholds and a greater net benefit compared to qSOFA between a 1% and 10% threshold probability level for predicting mortality. PRACTICE had a greater net benefit compared to all other scores for predicting ICU admission across all threshold probabilities. A PRACTICE score >75 was more sensitive than a qSOFA score >1 (90% versus 54.3%, 35.7 difference, 95% CI = 24.5-46.9), SIRS criteria >1 (18.6 difference, 95% CI = 9.5-27.7), and a BOMBARD score >2 (12.9 difference, 95% CI = 5-12.9) for predicting mortality. CONCLUSION: PRACTICE was more accurate than BOMBARD, SIRS, and qSOFA for predicting mortality. PRACTICE had a superior net benefit at most thresholds compared to other scores for predicting mortality and ICU admissions.
RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Debate exists about the mortality benefit of administering antibiotics within either 1 or 3 hours of sepsis onset. We performed this meta-analysis to analyze the effect of immediate (0 to 1 hour after onset) versus early (1 to 3 hours after onset) antibiotics on mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: This review was consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Searched databases included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as gray literature. Included studies were conducted with consecutive adults with severe sepsis or septic shock who received antibiotics within each period and provided mortality data. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and pooled with random effects. Two authors independently assessed quality of evidence across all studies with Cochrane's Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology and risk of bias within each study, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included: 5 prospective longitudinal and 8 retrospective cohort ones. Three studies (23%) had a high risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Overall, quality of evidence across all studies (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was low. Pooling of data (33,863 subjects) showed no difference in mortality between patients receiving antibiotics in immediate versus early periods (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.21). Analysis of severe sepsis studies (8,595 subjects) found higher mortality in immediate versus early periods (odds ratio 1.29; 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.53). CONCLUSION: We found no difference in mortality between immediate and early antibiotics across all patients. Although the quality of evidence across studies was low, these findings do not support a mortality benefit for immediate compared with early antibiotics across all patients with sepsis.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Sepse/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To predict severe sepsis/septic shock in ED patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of patients ≥18 admitted to two urban hospitals with a combined ED census of 162,000. Study cases included patients with severe sepsis/septic shock admitted via the ED. Controls comprised admissions without severe sepsis/septic shock. Using multivariate logistic regression, a prediction rule was constructed. The model's AUROC was internally validated using 1000 bootstrap samples. RESULTS: 143 study and 286 control patients were evaluated. Features predictive of severe sepsis/septic shock included: SBPâ¯≤â¯110â¯mmâ¯Hg, shock index/SIâ¯≥â¯0.86, abnormal mental status or GCSâ¯<â¯15, respirationsâ¯≥â¯22, temperatureâ¯≥â¯38C, assisted living facility residency, disabled immunity. Two points were assigned to SI and temperature with other features assigned one point (mnemonic: BOMBARD). BOMBARD was superior to SIRS criteria (AUROC 0.860 vs. 0.798, 0.062 difference, 95% CI 0.022-0.102) and qSOFA scores (0.860 vs. 0.742, 0.118 difference, 95% CI 0.081-0.155) at predicting severe sepsis/septic shock. A BOMBARD scoreâ¯≥â¯3 was more sensitive than SIRSâ¯≥â¯2 (74.8% vs. 49%, 25.9% difference, 95% CI 18.7-33.1) and qSOFAâ¯≥â¯2 (74.8% vs. 33.6%, 41.2% difference, 95% CI 33.2-49.3) at predicting severe sepsis/septic shock. A BOMBARD scoreâ¯≥â¯3 was superior to SIRSâ¯≥â¯2 (76% vs. 45%, 32% difference, 95% CI 10-50) and qSOFAâ¯≥â¯2 (76% vs. 29%, 47% difference, 95% CI 25-63) at predicting sepsis mortality. CONCLUSION: BOMBARD was more accurate than SIRS and qSOFA at predicting severe sepsis/septic shock and sepsis mortality.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Sepse/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The 50-year relationship between Weizsäcker and Heisenberg spanned the highpoints of discovery and dictatorship during the 1930s, extended into the war-time uranium project, the post-war controversy over that project, debates over West German nuclear policy, and the philosophical implications of modern physics. This paper explores the interaction between these two leading figures during that difficult and significant half-century.
Assuntos
Academias e Institutos/história , Socialismo Nacional/história , Disciplinas das Ciências Naturais/história , Física Nuclear/história , Filosofia/história , Política , Política Pública/história , Pesquisa/história , Urânio/história , Alemanha , História do Século XX , História do Século XXIRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We report a case of an atypical presentation of acute appendicitis in an adult due to an undiagnosed congenital gut malrotation. OBJECTIVE: The obvious benefit of observation with serial examinations followed by the use of computed tomography (CT) is discussed in aiding in the diagnosis for atypical presentations of appendicitis. CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old man who presented with epigastric pain and vomiting was diagnosed with acute left-sided appendicitis on CT scan. The patient's appendix was located in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen due to undiagnosed congenital gut malrotation, thus resulting in an atypical presentation of a common illness. CONCLUSION: Observation with serial examinations, followed by CT scanning if indicated, is an invaluable strategy to use in diagnosing atypical presentations of common pathology.
Assuntos
Apendicite/diagnóstico , Enteropatias/diagnóstico , Anormalidade Torcional/diagnóstico , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Gastrite/diagnóstico , Humanos , Enteropatias/congênito , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Anormalidade Torcional/congênitoRESUMO
Low back pain (LBP) is the most common and expensive musculoskeletal (MSK) disorder in industrialized countries. There is evidence that personal and occupational psychosocial variables play a more important role than spinal pathology or the physical demands of the job. However, it is unclear which psychosocial variables are most important. The objective of this study is to understand which psychosocial variables are deemed most important to various workplace stakeholders involved in the process of returning a worker with LBP to work. Nine focus groups were convened with injured workers, small and large employers, unions, health and safety associations, physicians and non-physician clinicians, return to work coordinators and compensation board representatives in Ontario, Canada. A qualitative grounded theory approach was applied to explore, from their perspectives, important psychosocial factors that prevent the promotion of early and safe return to work (RTW) for individuals with LBP. While the study began by asking questions related to the various psychosocial factors and their association to LBP and RTW, it took an interesting turn. The majority of study participants described how psychosocial factors were the product of larger systemic/organizational issues. Rather than focusing solely on individual psychosocial factors, respondents described how the context of a much larger system, and the complex interplay between the many different components of that system, contributes directly or indirectly to the treatment of LBP and RTW. It is the interrelationships between these systems that determine the process of returning an injured worker with LBP back to work. Although it is important to understand how psychosocial factors affect RTW, organizational structures within our social context seem to play a role in shaping how all stakeholders see and emotionally respond to LBP and RTW, as well as the degree to which they can envision taking action on them. We need to consider moving beyond a psychosocial conceptualization of LBP and RTW into a sociopolitical and economic conceptualization. This reconceptualization provides insight into the "upstream factors" associated with LBP and RTW.
Assuntos
Emprego/organização & administração , Emprego/psicologia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Doenças Profissionais/psicologia , Absenteísmo , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Masculino , Doenças Profissionais/reabilitação , Ontário , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Local de TrabalhoRESUMO
This study investigates the structural evolution of a series of nanohybrid powders and coatings synthesized by direct co-condensation of amino-functionalized alkyltrialkoxysilanes and tetraalkoxysilanes with an aromatic carboxylic acid (trimesic acid, TMA) as a structure directing agent. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and (13)C CP-MAS NMR results have suggested the formation of secondary (-CO-NH-) amide linkages upon interaction of TMA with the amino functionalized silane thus creating a "scaffold" around which the silica network is formed and also assisting in more homogeneous distribution of nitrogen sites within the nanohybrid structure. Functionalized silica powders were investigated for their potential to remove toxic oxyanions from mildly acidic or basic solutions. The uptake of Mo(VI), Se(VI), and Cr(VI) oxyanions was investigated as a function of the nanohybrid composition, oxyanion concentration, and solution pH using laser diffraction particle sizing, gas adsorption, and various spectroscopic techniques. The adsorption data obtained for Mo and Se could be adequately described by Langmuir adsorption isotherms, while the Freundlich isotherm is employed to fit the adsorption data for Cr. An easily accessible processing window (of pH, aging time, etc.) has been identified allowing production of continuous and uniform thin nanohybrid coatings on silicon and glass substrates. These coatings were tested as chemical barriers against Mo leaching from specially prepared Mo-doped glass. Leaching studies were conducted over 200 days in water at 90 degrees C and the Mo leaching from coated and uncoated samples compared.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite over 2 decades of research, the ability to prevent work-related low back pain (LBP) and disability remains elusive. Recent research suggests that interventions that are focused at the workplace and incorporate the principals of participatory ergonomics and return-to-work (RTW) coordination can improve RTW and reduce disability following a work-related back injury. Workplace interventions or programs to improve RTW are difficult to design and implement given the various individuals and environments involved, each with their own unique circumstances. Intervention mapping provides a framework for designing and implementing complex interventions or programs. The objective of this study is to design a best evidence RTW program for occupational LBP tailored to the Ontario setting using an intervention mapping approach. METHODS: We used a qualitative synthesis based on the intervention mapping methodology. Best evidence from systematic reviews, practice guidelines and key articles on the prognosis and management of LBP and improving RTW was combined with theoretical models for managing LBP and changing behaviour. This was then systematically operationalized into a RTW program using consensus among experts and stakeholders. The RTW Program was further refined following feedback from nine focus groups with various stakeholders. RESULTS: A detailed five step RTW program was developed. The key features of the program include; having trained personnel coordinate the RTW process, identifying and ranking barriers and solutions to RTW from the perspective of all important stakeholders, mediating practical solutions at the workplace and, empowering the injured worker in RTW decision-making. CONCLUSION: Intervention mapping provided a useful framework to develop a comprehensive RTW program tailored to the Ontario setting.
Assuntos
Planejamento Ambiental/normas , Dor Lombar/prevenção & controle , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/reabilitação , Local de Trabalho/normas , Absenteísmo , Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Ergonomia/métodos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Prova Pericial , Retroalimentação , Grupos Focais/métodos , Humanos , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normasRESUMO
Although neck pain is a common source of disability, little is known about its incidence and course. We conducted a population-based cohort study of 1100 randomly selected Saskatchewan adults to determine the annual incidence of neck pain and describe its course. Subjects were initially surveyed by mail in September 1995 and followed-up 6 and 12 months later. The age and gender standardized annual incidence of neck pain is 14.6% (95% confidence interval: 11.3, 17.9). Each year, 0.6% (95% confidence interval: 0.0-1.1) of the population develops disabling neck pain. The annual rate of resolution of neck pain is 36.6% (95% confidence interval: 32.7, 40.5) and another 32.7% (95% confidence interval: 25.5, 39.9) report improvement. Among subjects with prevalent neck pain at baseline, 37.3% (95% confidence interval: 33.4, 41.2) report persistent problems and 9.9% (95% confidence interval: 7.4, 12.5) experience an aggravation during follow-up. Finally, 22.8% (95% confidence interval: 16.4, 29.3) of those with prevalent neck pain at baseline report a recurrent episode. Women are more likely than men to develop neck pain (incidence rate ratio=1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.60); more likely to suffer from persistent neck problems (incidence rate ratio=1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.38) and less likely to experience resolution (incidence rate ratio=0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.88). Neck pain is a disabling condition with a course marked by periods of remission and exacerbation. Contrary to prior belief, most individuals with neck pain do not experience complete resolution of their symptoms and disability.
Assuntos
Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Cervicalgia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cervicalgia/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Distribuição Aleatória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
This case of an unintentional ingestion of an unknown amount of potassium permanganate by a 5-year-old boy, and its sequelae, exemplifies the potential danger of this poison. Due to the wide availability of this agent in over-the-counter preparations and the high potential for serious sequelae, clinicians should be aware of the actions of this agent, as well as the diagnostic and management features associated with it.