Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Surg ; 133(3): 272-4; discussion 275, 1998 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9517739

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current treatment of malignant melanoma of the leg includes ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy (IIL). Standard open IIL (open IIL) includes sectioning of the inguinal ligament to gain access to the iliac nodes. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic IIL (lap IIL) is a feasible, less aggressive approach. It can be combined with standard superficial lymphadenectomy for treatment of malignant melanoma. DESIGN: Comparative, prospective, nonrandomized series. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Twelve consecutive, unselected patients with malignant melanoma treated with lap IIL (group 1) were compared with 10 consecutive, unselected patients with malignant melanoma on whom open IIL was performed (group 2). INTERVENTIONS: Standard open IIL and laparoscopic extraperitoneal iliac lymphadenectomy (lap IIL) plus superficial groin lymphadenectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, intraoperative complications, requirements of analgesia, total volume of lymphatic drainage, number of lymph nodes retrieved, immediate morbidity, hospital stay, and long-term morbidity were evaluated. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer for the lap IIL group (group 1) than for the open IIL group (group 2) (177+/-44 vs 140+/-18 minutes, respectively; P<.05), but no patients in group 1 needed conversion to open surgery or developed related complications. Overall lymphatic drainage was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (615+/-518 mL vs 1393+/-793 mL, repectively; P<.01). The number of doses of analgesics (13+/-8 vs 31+/-22, P<.03) and length of postoperative stay (7.3+/-3.3 vs 13+/-5 days, P<.006) were also significantly lower in the laparoscopic group. The overall number of lymph nodes retrieved was similar in both groups (10.2+/-4.6 vs 10+/-3, P=.9). One patient developed a groin hernia of 6 m after open IIL. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically assisted IIL offers a less aggressive approach than open IIL and entails less pain and a shorter hospital stay, as we observed in 2 groups with similar oncological results (mainly, a similar number of lymph nodes retrieved) who were treated with one procedure or the other. Further research should be done to confirm these preliminary advantages in a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Perna (Membro) , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Melanoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Virilha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritônio , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Aust N Z J Surg ; 60(3): 225-6, 1990 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2327928

RESUMO

The case of a bisexual male patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and an infected abdominal aortic aneurysm requiring surgery is presented. Attention is drawn to the fact that an unpredictable number of operations will be needed in AIDS patients in the next future.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/complicações , Aneurisma Infectado/complicações , Aneurisma Aórtico/complicações , Ruptura Aórtica/complicações , Infecções por Salmonella/complicações , Aneurisma Infectado/cirurgia , Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...