RESUMO
The aims of this observational "proof-of-concept" study were to analyze the clinical/psychological characteristics and gut microbiota/mycobiota composition of individuals with suspected non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity (NCGS/WS) according to responses to the double-blind-placebo-controlled (DBPC) crossover gluten challenge test. Fifty individuals with suspected NCGS/WS were subjected to the DBPC challenge test; anthropometric measurements, psychometric questionnaires, and fecal samples were collected. Twenty-seven (54%) participants were gluten responsive (NCGS), and 23 were placebo responsive, with an order effect. NCGS individuals displayed a significantly lower risk of eating disorders and a higher mental health score when compared to placebo-responsive participants, confirmed by multiple logistic regression analyses (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-0.98, p = 0.021, and OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.06-1.59, p = 0.009, respectively). Principal coordinate analyses based on microbiota composition showed a separation by the DBPC response (p = 0.039). For Bacteroides (p = 0.05) and Parabacteroides (p = 0.007), the frequency of amplicon sequence variants was lower, and that for Blautia (p = 0.009) and Streptococcus (p = 0.004) was higher in NCGS individuals at multiple regression analyses. No difference in the mycobiota composition was detected between the groups. In conclusion, almost half of the individuals with suspected gluten sensitivity reported symptoms with placebo; they showed lower mental health scores, increased risk for eating disorders, and a different gut microbiota composition.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/epidemiologia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/imunologia , Glutens/administração & dosagem , Micobioma/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Fezes/microbiologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/imunologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/psicologia , Feminino , Glutens/imunologia , Humanos , Testes Imunológicos/métodos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Psicometria , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the main cause of hyponatremia in cancer patients. International guidelines indicate urea as an interesting option for chronic SIAD. Nevertheless, strong data to support its use are lacking, and its role in oncologic patients has not been described so far. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 36 cancer patients affected by moderate or profound SIAD-induced chronic hyponatremia, who started oral urea (initial daily dose 15 g or 30 g) without fluid restriction between July 2013 and July 2018. We analysed mean serum sodium (sNa) increase after 24 hours and percentages of patients who reached eunatremia within 14, 30 and 60 days of treatment, stratifying according to the degree of hyponatremia at diagnosis. Clinical evaluation and biochemical assessment were periodically performed. RESULTS: Mean sNa was 123 [±4] mmol/L at baseline; after 24 hours of treatment, a mean increase of 5 [±3] mmol/L was observed. Eunatremia was reached by 55.6%, 86.1% and 91.7% patients within 14, 30 and 60 days of treatment, respectively. Trends in sNa normalization were similar in patients with moderate and profound hyponatremia at diagnosis. Rapid sNa overcorrection was avoided in all cases. Urea was interrupted within the first 2 months of treatment in 10 patients, in half cases for rapid neoplastic progression and in the remaining patients for the drug taste. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, urea was effective in correcting chronic hyponatremia among cancer patients with SIAD. Almost all patients reached eunatremia within the first month of therapy, and urea was globally well tolerated.