Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Surgery in Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors.

BACKGROUND: After surgery for liver tumors, recurrence rates remain high because of residual positive margins or undiagnosed lesions. It has been suggested that detection of hepatic tumors can be obtained with near-infrared fluorescence imaging (FI). Indocyanine green (ICG) has been used with contrasting results. The aims of this study were to explore ICG-FI-guided surgery methodology and to assess its potential applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 14 patients with liver tumors, 5 were not operated on, and 9 patients (3 primary and 6 metastatic tumors) underwent surgery. ICG (0.5 mg/kg) was injected intravenously 24 hours before surgery. Fluorescence was investigated prior to resection to detect liver lesions, during hepatic transection to guide surgery, on both cross-section and benchtop to assess surgical margins, and for pathological evaluation. RESULTS: All operations were successful and had a short duration. ICG-FI detected all already known lesions (n = 10), and identified 2 additional small tumors (1 hepatocarcinoma and 1 metastasis, diagnostic improvement = 20%). Two hepatocarcinomas were hyperfluorescent; the remaining one, with a central hypofluorescent area and a hyperfluorescent ring, was indeed a mixed cholangiohepatocarcinoma. All metastatic nodules were hypofluorescent with a hyperfluorescent rim. In all cases, in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence revealed clear liver margins. Postoperative pathological examination greatly benefited of liver fluorescence to assess radicality. CONCLUSION: ICG-FI-guided surgery was shown to be an effective tool to improve both intraoperative staging and radicality in the surgical treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in the Combined Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Colorectal Cancer: Preliminary Results and Considerations.

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) is a near-infrared fluorescent contrast agent, which preferentially accumulates in cancer tissue. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of fluorescence imaging (FI) with ICG (ICG-FI) for detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Four CRC patients with PC scheduled for cytoreductive surgery + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. At a median time of 50 min after 0.25 mg/kg ICG injected intravenously, intraoperative ICG-FI using Fluobeam® was performed in vivo and ex vivo on all specimens. The Peritoneal Cancer Index was used to estimate the likelihood of complete cytoreduction. RESULTS: No severe complications were recorded. ICG-FI took a median of 20 min (range 10-30, IQR 15-25). Sixty-nine nodules were harvested. Fifty-two nodules had been diagnosed preoperatively by conventional imaging (n = 30; 43%) or intraoperatively by visual inspection/palpation (n = 22; 32%). With ICG-FI, 47 (90%) nodules were hyperfluorescent, and five hypofluorescent. Intraoperative ICG-FI identified 17 additional hyperfluorescent nodules. On histopathology, 16 were metastatic nodules. Sensitivity increased from 76.9%, with the conventional diagnostic procedures, to 96.9% with ICG-FI. The positive predictive value of ICG-FI was 98.4%, and test accuracy was 95.6%. Diagnostic performance of ICG-FI was significantly better than preoperative (p = 0.027) and intraoperative conventional procedures (p = 0.042). The median PCI score increased from 7 to 10 after ICG-FI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that intraoperative ICG-FI can improve outcomes in patients undergoing CS for PC from CRC. Further studies are needed to determine the role of ICG-FI in this patient population.

Propensity score-matched comparison between complete mesocolic excision and classic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of right colon cancer remains disappointing. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL), based on the same oncological principles of total mesorectal excision, has been speculated to result in a better outcome. To evaluate the oncological adequacy of CME with CVL, we carried out a comparative study with propensity score-matched analysis between two different surgical procedures performed at Italian and Egyptian University cancer centers. METHODS: Forty-six Egyptian patients underwent conventional right hemicolectomy, while eighty-eight Italian patients underwent CME with sharp dissection between the embryological planes, exposure of the superior mesenteric vessels with extended lymphadenectomy, and CVL. RESULTS: All operations were successful with no increase in postoperative complications (10% in the patients undergoing CME vs. 19.5% in Egyptian patients). Number of harvested nodes (21 vs. 13) and lymph node ratio (0.08 vs. 0.22) were significantly different in patients undergoing CME (P=0.0001 and P=0.005, respectively). In these patients, the risk of cancer relapse was reduced to as much as one third (8% vs. 22%), even in node-positive tumors, and locoregional recurrences were never experienced. The classic operation was significantly associated with poor outcome (5-year disease-free survival rates were 89.2% in the group undergoing CME and 49.1% in the classic group, P=0.02). Propensity score-matched analysis warranted optimal balance and confirmed overall results. CONCLUSIONS: Right colon cancer patients undergoing CME benefitted from more oncological adequacy, with no increased postoperative complication rate, a decreased locoregional recurrence rate, and a better long-term outcome than patients operated on with the conventional procedure.

Naples Prognostic Score, Based on Nutritional and Inflammatory Status, is an Independent Predictor of Long-term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The existing scores reflecting the patient's nutritional and inflammatory status do not include all biomarkers and have been poorly studied in colorectal cancers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess a new prognostic tool, the Naples prognostic score, comparing it with the prognostic nutritional index, controlling nutritional status score, and systemic inflammation score. DESIGN: This was an analysis of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 562 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer in July 2004 through June 2014 and 468 patients undergoing potentially curative surgery were included. MaxStat analysis dichotomized neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte:monocyte ratio, prognostic nutritional index, and the controlling nutritional status score. The Naples prognostic scores were divided into 3 groups (group 0, 1, and 2). The receiver operating characteristic curve for censored survival data compared the prognostic performance of the scoring systems. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and complication rates in all patients, as well as recurrence and disease-free survival rates in radically resected patients, were measured. RESULTS: The Naples prognostic score correlated positively with the other scoring systems (p < 0.001) and worsened with advanced tumor stages (p < 0.001). Patients with the worst Naples prognostic score experienced more postoperative complications (all patients, p = 0.010; radically resected patients, p = 0.026). Compared with group 0, patients in groups 1 and 2 had worse overall (group 1, HR = 2.90; group 2, HR = 8.01; p < 0.001) and disease-free survival rates (group 1, HR = 2.57; group 2, HR = 6.95; p < 0.001). Only the Naples prognostic score was an independent significant predictor of overall (HR = 2.0; p = 0.03) and disease-free survival rates (HR = 2.6; p = 0.01). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the Naples prognostic score had the best prognostic performance and discriminatory power for overall (p = 0.02) and disease-free survival (p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center study, and its validity needs additional external validation. CONCLUSIONS: The Naples prognostic score is a simple tool strongly associated with long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A469.

Preoperative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio are Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancers Undergoing Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cancer outcome is considered to result from the interplay of several factors, among which host inflammatory and immune status are deemed to play a significant role. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been profitably used as surrogate markers of host immunoinflammatory status and have also been shown to correlate with outcome in several human tumors. However, only a few studies on these biomarkers have been performed in gastric cancer patients, yielding conflicting results. METHODS: Data were retrieved from a prospective institutional database. Overall survival (OS) of 401 patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer between January 2000 and June 2015 as well as disease-free survival (DFS) rates in 297 radically resected patients were calculated. MaxStat analysis was used to select cutoff values for NLR and LMR. RESULTS: NLR and LMR did not significantly correlate with tumor stage. Patients with a high NLR and a low LMR experienced more tumor recurrences (p < 0.001) and had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for both OS (HR = 2.4 and HR = 2.10; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 2.99 and HR = 2.46; p < 0.001) than low NLR and high LMR subjects. Both biomarkers were shown to independently predict OS (HR = 1.65, p = 0.016; HR = 2.01, p = 0.002, respectively) and DFS (HR = 3.04, p = 0.019; HR = 4.76, p = 0.002, respectively). A score system combining both biomarkers was found to significantly correlate with long-term results. CONCLUSIONS: A simple prognostic score including preoperative NLR and LMR can be used to easily predict outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Comparison of the current AJCC-TNM numeric-based with a new anatomical location-based lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: A western experience.

BACKGROUND: In gastric cancer, the current AJCC numeric-based lymph node staging does not provide information on the anatomical extent of the disease and lymphadenectomy. A new anatomical location-based node staging, proposed by Choi, has shown better prognostic performance, thus soliciting Western world validation. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 284 gastric cancers undergoing radical surgery at the Second University of Naples from 2000 to 2014 were reviewed. The lymph nodes were reclassified into three groups (lesser and greater curvature, and extraperigastric nodes); presence of any metastatic lymph node in a given group was considered positive, prompting a new N and TNM stage classification. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves for censored survival data and bootstrap methods were used to compare the capability of the two models to predict tumor recurrence. RESULTS: More than one third of node positive patients were reclassified into different N and TNM stages by the new system. Compared to the current staging system, the new classification significantly correlated with tumor recurrence rates and displayed improved indices of prognostic performance, such as the Bayesian information criterion and the Harrell C-index. Higher values at survival ROC analysis demonstrated a significantly better stratification of patients by the new system, mostly in the early phase of the follow-up, with a worse prognosis in more advanced new N stages, despite the same current N stage. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the anatomical location-based classification of lymph node metastasis may be an important tool for gastric cancer prognosis and should be considered for future revision of the TNM staging system.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a strong predictor of tumor recurrence in early colon cancers: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation and immune response play a crucial role in tumor growth, and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be a simple way to assess the host inflammatory response. The NLR has been shown to be a prognostic indicator in many human tumors; in early colon cancers, it has been evaluated only in a few studies and its role remains controversial. METHODS: We analyzed data from 503 colon cancer patients. The best cutoff value for NLR was defined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We grouped 276 Dukes A/B colon cancers, not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, into low (<2.36) and high (>2.36) NLR and subjected to further analyses related to disease-free survival (DFS). A propensity score-matched analysis and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to avoid confounding bias. RESULTS: The NLR correlated with tumor stage and oncologic outcome. The best NLR cutoff value was identical in the whole cohort and in Dukes A/B patients. Low NLR patients had a significantly better DFS rate than high NLR patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; P = .0001); along with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels and Dukes B stage, high NLR was an independent prognostic factor of worse prognosis (HR, 2.86; P = .0033). Even in Dukes A patients, NLR discriminated between relapsing and nonrelapsing patients. Propensity score and IPTW analyses confirmed such results, thus excluding possible misinterpretation. CONCLUSION: Preoperative NLR, an inexpensive and readily available biomarker, can predict tumor relapse and should be assessed for implementation of tailored therapy in early stage colon cancer.

CD26-positive/CD326-negative circulating cancer cells as prognostic markers for colorectal cancer recurrence.

The present study evaluated the presence and clinical relevance of a cluster of differentiation (CD)26+/CD326- subset of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pre- and post-operative blood samples of colorectal cancer patients, who had undergone curative or palliative intervention, in order to find a novel prognostic factor for patient management and follow-up. In total, 80 colorectal cancer patients, along with 25 healthy volunteers were included. The easily transferable methodology of flow cytometry, along with multiparametric antibody staining were used to selectively evaluate CD26+/CD326- CTCs in the peripheral blood samples of colorectal cancer patients. The multiparametric selection allowed any enrichment methods to be avoided thus rendering the whole procedure suitable for clinical routine. The presence of CD26+/CD326- cells was higher in advanced Dukes' stages and was significantly associated with poor survival and high recurrence rates. Relapsing and non-surviving patients showed the highest number of CD26+/CD326- CTCs. High pre-operative levels of CD26+/CD326- CTCs correctly predicted tumor relapse in 44.4% of the cases, while 69% of post-operative CD26+/CD326- CTC-positive patients experienced cancer recurrence, with a test accuracy of 88.8%. By contrast, post-operative CD26+/CD326- CTC-negative patients showed an increase in the three-year progression-free survival rate of 86%, along with a reduced risk of tumor relapse of >90%. In conclusion, CD26+/CD326- CTCs are an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence rate in multivariate analysis, suggesting that their evaluation could be an additional factor for colorectal cancer recurrence risk evaluation in patient management.

Modified versus standard D2 lymphadenectomy in total gastrectomy for nonjunctional gastric carcinoma with lymph node metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Although D2 lymphadenectomy has been shown to improve outcomes in gastric cancer, it may increase postoperative morbidity, mainly owing to splenopancreatic complications. In addition, the effects of nodal dissection along the proper hepatic artery have not been extensively elucidated. We hypothesized that modified D2 (ie, D1+) lymphadenectomy may decrease surgical risks without impairing oncologic adequacy. METHODS: Patients with node-positive gastric cancer undergoing curative total gastrectomy were intraoperatively randomized to D1+ (group 1, 36 patients) or standard D2 lymphadenectomy (group 2, 37 patients), the latter including splenectomy and nodal group 12a. The index of estimated benefit was used to assess the efficacy of dissection of each nodal station. The primary endpoint for oncologic adequacy was the disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS: Surgical complications were significantly more common in group 2, which also included 2 postoperative deaths. Overall, 35 patients (49%) experienced tumor recurrence. The primary site of tumor relapse and the 5-year DFS rate were not different between the 2 groups. Involvement of the second nodal level was associated with a worse DFS rate; however, patients undergoing more extensive lymphadenectomy did not show a better DFS rate. The incidence of involvement of nodal stations 10, 11d, and 12a was 5%, and the 5-year DFS rate was zero. Consequently, the benefit to dissect such lymph nodes was null. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that modified D2 lymphadenectomy confers the same oncologic adequacy as standard D2 lymphadenectomy, with a significant reduction of postoperative morbidity.

Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study.

PURPOSE: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been proposed for treatment of colon cancers based on the same principles as total mesorectal excision. Impressive outcomes have been reported, however, direct comparisons with the classic procedure are lacking. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients operated on in the last 5 years with CME and CVL right hemicolectomy entered the study. Fifty-eight right-sided colon cancer patients operated in the previous 5 years with classic approach constituted the control group. Intra- and postoperative course assessed the safety of the procedure. Primary end-points for oncological adequacy were recurrence and survival rate. RESULTS: All operations were successful with no increase in postoperative complications (p = 0.85). Number of harvested nodes and length of vascular ligation were shown to be significantly better in the CME group (p < 0.01). A higher number of tumor deposits were harvested thus allowing chemotherapy in newly upstaged patients. Locoregional recurrences were never experienced in CME patients (p = 0.03). The risk of cancer-related death was reduced by over one half in all CME patients, and even by three quarters in node-positive tumors. The classic operation was significantly associated with poor outcome (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows that CME with CVL is a safe and effective surgical approach for right colon cancer, thus confirming the previously reported oncological adequacy. The procedure was shown to significantly decrease local recurrences and to improve the survival rate, particularly in node-positive patients. Urgent diffusion of this technique is warranted.

Conversion chemotherapy followed by hepatic resection in colorectal cancer with initially unresectable liver-limited metastases.

The best management choice in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver-only metastases should be represented by conversion chemotherapy aiming to reduce liver cancer deposits, thereby permitting curative surgery. Forty-eight consecutive stage IV colorectal cancer patients were treated with different chemotherapeutic regimens including biological drugs. Objective responses to chemotherapy were seen in 27 patients (56.2%; 95% CI 42.1-70.2%). Four patients (8.3%) showed complete response, 23 patients (47.9%) partial and 13 patients (27.1%) stable response. Eight patients (16.7%) progressed. The conversion rate was 35.4% (95% CI 21.8-48.9%) with 17 patients suitable for liver resection. Four complete responder patients refused surgery. The remaining 13 patients underwent curative hepatic resection (resection rate 27.1%; 95% CI 14.5-39.6%). The likelihood of a successful conversion chemotherapy appeared significantly related to the best response and to the K-Ras status. Wild-type K-Ras patients undergoing cetuximab therapy showed the best conversion rate. The four-year survival rate was significantly enhanced in converted compared to non-converted patients (57.1 and 0%, respectively), and in resected compared to non-resected patients (53.3 and 10.1%, respectively). Synchronous metastases and no conversion were shown to be the only covariates independently associated with a poorer long-term outcome. The possibility of curative liver surgery significantly prolongs outcome for colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver-limited metastases. Prospective randomized trials are required to define the conversion rates with biological drugs.

Postoperative detection of circulating tumor cells predicts tumor recurrence in colorectal cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumor cells are thought to play a crucial role in the development of distant metastases. Their detection in the blood of colorectal cancer patients may be linked to poor outcome, but current evidence is controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre- and postoperative flow cytometric analysis of blood samples was carried out in 76 colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. The EpCAM/CD326 epithelial surface antigen was used to identify circulating tumor cells. RESULTS: Fifty-four (71%) patients showed circulating tumor cells preoperatively, and all metastatic patients showed high levels of circulating tumor cells. Surgical resection resulted in a significant decrease in the levels of circulating tumor cells. Among 69 patients undergoing radical surgery, 16 had high postoperative levels of circulating tumor cells, and 12 (75%) experienced tumor recurrence. High postoperative level of circulating tumor cells was the only independent variable related to cancer relapse. In patients without circulating tumor cells, the progression-free survival rate increased from 16 to 86%, with a reduction in the risk of tumor relapse greater than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: High postoperative levels of circulating tumor cells accurately predicted tumor recurrence, suggesting that assessment of circulating tumor cells could optimize tailored management of colorectal cancer patients.

The Over-The-Scope-Clip (OTSC) system is effective in the treatment of chronic esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage.

INTRODUCTION: Management of postoperative esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy represents a very challenging event. Surgical repair is difficult, and conservative treatment can predispose to more severe complications. Endoclips and self-expanding stents are useful endoscopic therapeutic options but present some drawbacks. The Over-The-Scope-Clip (OTSC) system has been shown to be appropriate to close acute small gastrointestinal perforations, but its use in the treatment of chronic leakage remains controversial. CASE SERIES: The present series reports three consecutive chronic esophagojejunal anastomotic leaks successfully treated with OTSC. In all cases, clip application was simple, safe and effective, without early and late complications. DISCUSSION: The OTSC system may represent a new therapeutic option in the management of postoperative esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage.

Combined CD133/CD44 expression as a prognostic indicator of disease-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

HYPOTHESIS: Because of some inconsistencies in the traditional model of human colorectal carcinogenesis, the cancer stem cell (CSC) model was recently proposed, in which tumor results from neoplastic transformation of stem cells, which become CSCs. Identification of CSCs by expression of surface antigens remains a critical issue because no biomarker has been shown to be completely reliable. CD133 and CD44 are commonly used as CSC markers, and correlation of their expression with colorectal cancer (CRC) clinicopathological features and outcomes may be useful. DESIGN: Pilot study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with CRC. CD133 and CD44 expression (alone or combined) was determined in nontumor cells and in tumor cells by flow cytometry, which identified viable cells only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of CD133 and CD44 expression with each other, with other prognostic indicators, and with disease-free survival. RESULTS: CD133 and CD44 expression was significantly higher in tumor cells than in nontumor cells, and expression of one did not necessarily correlate with expression of the other. CD133 or CD44 expression alone was variable, while combined CD133/CD44 expression identified a small subset of cells positive for CRC. CD133 or CD44 overexpression was not associated with CRC recurrence; only high frequencies of CD133(+)/CD44(+) cells were a strong indicator of worse disease-free survival and an independent risk factor for CRC recurrence. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of combined CD133/CD44 expression could be useful to identify putative colorectal CSCs and tumors with a poor prognosis.

Radiofrequency-assisted liver resection with a comb-shaped bipolar device versus clamp crushing: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: In liver surgery, clamp-crushing (CC) procedure has been shown to be the most efficient system for liver transection. Recently, it has been suggested that radiofrequency-assisted liver resection (RFALR) may be more advantageous, but sufficient evidence has yet to be accumulated. METHOD: The control group was constituted by 32 patients undergoing CC liver transection. The study group included 13 patients undergoing RFALR with a new fully automated radiofrequency generator supplying a comb-shaped bipolar multielectrode device. RESULTS: RFALR allowed a faster hepatic transection and reduced both surgical time and intraoperative blood loss. RFALR was the only independent prognostic indicator of bleeding during liver transection. No significant liver damage and postoperative complications, particularly biliary leakage and stenosis, were experienced in the RFALR group. CONCLUSION: Compared with the CC procedure, this bipolar device was shown to be safe and effective in liver resections, allowing a very clean surgical field without increase of postoperative complications.

Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal anastomotic complications represent serious events; methods to evaluate anastomotic integrity seem to be suboptimal. Since endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing allows direct visualization of anastomosis, complication rates may be theoretically reduced by the use of this technique. METHODS: A prospective study involving 118 consecutive oncologic patients undergoing endoscopically tested gastrointestinal stapled anastomoses was carried out. As controls, 148 historical patients without anastomotic testing were used for comparisons. RESULTS: In the study group, anastomotic testing revealed 16 defects: 11 (9.3%) air leaks and five (4.3%) bleeding anastomoses. All leaks were oversewn and secured. Bleeding anastomoses were managed under direct visualization, and one non-patent anastomosis was redone. Forty-one (15.4%) postoperative anastomotic complications were observed: eight (3%) bleeding anastomoses, seven (2.6%) stenoses, and 26 (9.8%) clinical leaks. No early dehiscence or bleeding occurred if anastomoses were intraoperatively checked, while these complications were significantly more frequent in non-checked anastomoses (6.1% and 5.4%, respectively). Conversely, late leak and stenosis rates were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic anastomotic testing was a safe and reliable method to assess integrity of gastrointestinal anastomoses, to correct any defect under direct visualization, and to avoid early complications. However, this method seemed inadequate to predict late anastomotic complications.

Dufourmentel rhomboid flap in the radical treatment of primary and recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess early and late results of the Dufourmentel procedure in patients with primary and recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for pilonidal disease from November 1993 through July 2009 at the Second Department of General Surgery of the Second University of Naples were entered into the study. All patients underwent epidural anesthesia and radical excision followed by reconstruction with a Dufourmentel rhomboid flap. Study variables included preoperative body mass index, hospital stay, time to walking, sitting, and return to work, and pain score (visual analog scale) for evaluation early results and patient comfort. Time to complete wound healing, wound complications, and recurrence rates were recorded to assess late results. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients with pilonidal disease entered the study. Of these, 24 patients were asymptomatic (incidental diagnosis) and 55 had recurrent sinus. Obese patients had a significantly worse clinical presentation than patients with normal weight (P < .001). All operations were uneventful, with a mean operative time of 40 (range, 30-55) minutes after the surgeons' learning period, and no flap necrosis occurred. The median hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1-11 days), median time to return to work was 7 (range 5-30) days, and pain was minimal. Wound complications were experienced by 33 patients (10.6%). All but 2 patients were managed conservatively; in 2 patients (0.6%), the wound was resutured under local anesthesia and healed within 15 days. No patient was lost to follow-up. Recurrence was observed in 7 patients (2.3%). All relapses occurred in 25 months after the operation; no late recurrences were seen (5-, 10-, and 16-year recurrence-free rates were all 97.6%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in obese than in normal-weight patients (6% vs. 0.5%; P = .0029). Permanent hypoesthesia was negligible (0.9%), and no patient complained about the cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The Dufourmentel flap is associated with minimal discomfort and excellent results. This technique can be considered in the first- and second-line management of pilonidal disease.

The lymph node ratio is a powerful prognostic factor of node-positive colon cancers undergoing potentially curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: The number of harvested (LNs) and metastatic nodes (LNs+) represents the most significant factor to define postoperative treatment and prognosis in colon cancer. However, its assessment may be inadequate causing an incorrect cancer staging. The lymph node ratio (LNR: the ratio between metastatic and resected nodes) has shown prognostic significance in many tumors; however, its role in colon cancer is not clearly elucidated. This study investigated LNR as a prognostic factor in node-positive colon cancers. METHODS: A total of 145 consecutive patients with node-positive colon cancer who underwent curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in a single oncologic unit entered this study. RESULTS: LNR ranged from 0.0416 to 0.9; it was clearly lower in pN1 than pN2 patients, and increased as tumor stage worsened. ROC analysis selected 0.1818 as the best LNR cutoff value. Low LNR patients did significantly better than high LNR patients; this difference was not dependent on the number of LNs and stronger than differences observed by grouping patients according to LNs or LNs+. When stratified by low and high LNR value, pN1 and pN2 patients, as well as stage III subgroups were shown to display substantially different outcomes. LNR was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival, and the only covariate related to disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: LNR was a robust prognostic indicator for node-positive colon cancers undergoing curative surgery. Because this ratio-based staging was demonstrated to reduce stage migration and to aid in identifying high-risk patients, it should be proposed as a standard tool for colon cancer staging.

First-line chemotherapy vs bowel tumor resection plus chemotherapy for patients with unresectable synchronous colorectal hepatic metastases.

HYPOTHESIS: Bowel resection followed by chemotherapy is a better management strategy than immediate chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver-only metastases at presentation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-five consecutive symptom-free colorectal cancer patients with unresectable synchronous metastases confined to the liver undergoing bowel tumor resection plus systemic chemotherapy (42 patients [resection group]) or chemotherapy first (23 patients [chemotherapy group]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term survival and identification of prognostic indicators of outcome. RESULTS: In the resection group, the mean and median overall survival times were shown to be significantly better than those in the chemotherapy group (P = .03). Performance status, basal serum levels of lactic dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase, percentage of liver involvement, potentially curative resection of the bowel tumor, and type of treatment (resection vs chemotherapy) were demonstrated to be the only variables significantly correlated with long-term survival. On multivariate analysis, performance status, extent of liver involvement, and type of treatment were shown to be the only covariates independently associated with survival rate. The rate of liver metastasis downstaging with subsequent curative hepatic resection was clearly associated with good performance status, limited liver involvement, and resection of the bowel tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving complete cure in asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients with unresectable synchronous liver-only metastases appears to be mostly the result of shrinkage and resection of hepatic metastases. In patients with good performance status and limited liver involvement, bowel tumor resection appears to be the best treatment option for this purpose.