Decreased expression of transmembrane TNFR2 in lung leukocytes subpopulations of patients with non-fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis compared with the fibrotic disease.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an interstitial lung disease, characterized by lung inflammation (non-fibrotic HP) that may often progresses to fibrosis (Fibrotic HP). The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and its receptors (TNFR1 and TNFR2) can be found as soluble (sol) and transmembrane (tm) forms, playing pro-inflammatory functions but also has been related to immune regulatory functions. Bronchioalveolar lavage from fibrotic and non-fibrotic HP patients was obtained, and immune cells were characterized by flow cytometry, whereas soluble proteins were analyzed by ELISA. Compare to fibrotic HP patients, HP patients with non-fibrotic disease have accumulation of pro-inflammatory CD3+ myeloid cells, cell subpopulations that have decreased tmTNFR2 expression, and low frequency of regulatory-T cells. Whereas solTNF, solTNFR2, and IL-8 are increased. These findings suggest that the TNF pathway may explain, at least partially, the differences between both HP clinical forms. The evaluation of the TNF family molecules may help to develop new therapeutic approaches.

An Open-label Study With Pirfenidone on Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis / Estudio abierto con pirfenidona en neumonitis por hipersensibilidad crónica

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) represents a severe lung disease often evolving to fibrosis with the subsequent destruction of the lung parenchyma. There are no approved therapies with confirmed efficacy to deal with this disease. METHODS: We performed an open-label, proof of concept study, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone added to immunosuppressive drugs on the treatment of cHP. We included 22 patients assigned to two groups: Group 1, nine patients that received prednisone plus azathioprine and Group 2, thirteen patients, received prednisone plus azathioprine and pirfenidone (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02496182). There were no significant imbalances in clinically relevant baseline characteristics between two study groups. RESULTS: After 1 year of treatment, inclusion of pirfenidone was not associated with improved forced vital capacity (primary end-point). A not significant tendency to show higher improvement of diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was observed in the group receiving pirfenidone (p = 0.06). Likewise, a significant improvement in the total score on the SGRQ was found in the group 2 (p = 0.02) without differences in other two questionnaires related to quality of life (ATAQ-IPF and EQ-5D-3L). HRCT showed a decrease of the ground glass attenuation without changes in the fibrotic lesions and without differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the addition of pirfenidone to the anti-inflammatory treatment in patients with chronic HP may improve the outcome with acceptable safety profile. However, prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in largest cohorts are needed to validate its efficacy

ANTECEDENTES: La neumonitis por hipersensibilidad crónica es una enfermedad pulmonar grave que con frecuencia evoluciona hacia fibrosis, con la ulterior destrucción del parénquima pulmonar. No existen tratamientos aprobados con eficacia confirmada para el manejo de esta enfermedad. MÉTODOS: Llevamos a cabo un estudio preliminar de eficacia, abierto, para evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de la pirfenidona sumada a los fármacos inmunosupresores en el tratamiento de la neumonitis por hipersensibilidad crónica. Se incluyeron 22 pacientes, que se asignaron a dos grupos: grupo 1, 9 pacientes que recibieron prednisona y azatioprina; y grupo 2, 13 pacientes que recibieron prednisona, azatioprina y pirfenidona (identificador NCT02496182 en ClinicalTrials.gov). No se observaron alteraciones significativas en las características clínicamente relevantes iniciales entre ambos grupos. RESULTADOS: Tras un año de tratamiento, la inclusión de la pirfenidona no se asoció con una mejora de la capacidad vital forzada (objetivo principal). Se observó una tendencia no significativa a mostrar una mayor mejora en la capacidad de difusión de monóxido de carbono (DLCO) por el pulmón en el grupo que recibió pirfenidona (p = 0,06). Asimismo, se encontró una mejora significativa en la puntuación total del cuestionario SGRQ en el grupo 2 (p = 0,02) sin encontrarse diferencias en los otros dos cuestionarios relacionados con la calidad de vida de los pacientes (ATAQ-IPF y EQ-5D-3L). La TAC de alta resolución mostró una disminución de la atenuación en «vidrio deslustrado», sin cambios en las fibrosis y sin diferencias entre ambos grupos. CONCLUSIONES: Estos hallazgos sugieren que añadir pirfenidona al tratamiento antiinflamatorio en pacientes con neumonitis por hipersensibilidad crónica podría mejorar el pronóstico con un perfil de seguridad aceptable. Sin embargo, se necesitan ensayos prospectivos aleatorizados doble ciego y controlados con placebo para validar esta eficacia

An Open-label Study With Pirfenidone on Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) represents a severe lung disease often evolving to fibrosis with the subsequent destruction of the lung parenchyma. There are no approved therapies with confirmed efficacy to deal with this disease. METHODS: We performed an open-label, proof of concept study, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone added to immunosuppressive drugs on the treatment of cHP. We included 22 patients assigned to two groups: Group 1, nine patients that received prednisone plus azathioprine and Group 2, thirteen patients, received prednisone plus azathioprine and pirfenidone (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02496182). There were no significant imbalances in clinically relevant baseline characteristics between two study groups. RESULTS: After 1 year of treatment, inclusion of pirfenidone was not associated with improved forced vital capacity (primary end-point). A not significant tendency to show higher improvement of diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was observed in the group receiving pirfenidone (p=0.06). Likewise, a significant improvement in the total score on the SGRQ was found in the group 2 (p=0.02) without differences in other two questionnaires related to quality of life (ATAQ-IPF and EQ-5D-3L). HRCT showed a decrease of the ground glass attenuation without changes in the fibrotic lesions and without differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the addition of pirfenidone to the anti-inflammatory treatment in patients with chronic HP may improve the outcome with acceptable safety profile. However, prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in largest cohorts are needed to validate its efficacy.