Aesthetic results following breast cancer surgery: A prospective study on 6515 cases from ten Italian Senonetwork breast centers.

Breast cancer treatment has deeply changed in the last decades, since clinical and oncological cure cannot be achieved without patient's satisfaction in term of aesthetic outcomes. Several methods have been proposed to objectively assess these results. However, Italian breast centers have not yet agreed on measurable, reproducible and validated aesthetic outcome indicators to monitor their performance. METHODS: The study was designed and conducted by Senonetwork, a not-for-profit association of Italian breast centers. Ten breast centers were selected based on specific eligibility criteria. This multicentre observational prospective study recruited 6515 patients with diagnosis of in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent breast surgery in the years 2013-2016. Thirteen indicators of aesthetic results and of related quality of care were analyzed. Data collection and analysis were conducted using a common study database. RESULTS: On average, seven out of ten centers were able to collect data on the proposed indicators with a proportion of missing values < 25%. By expert consensus based on study results, some seven indicators have been defined as "mandatory" while the remaining six have been defined as "recommended" because they require further refinement before they can be proposed for monitoring aesthetic outcomes or because there are doubts on the feasibility of data collection. The minimum standard is reached for 5 of 13 indicators. This finding and the wide range between centers reveal that there is ample room for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: From the present study useful measurable aesthetic parameters have emerged, leading to the definition of target objectives that breast centers can use for benchmarking and improvement of quality of care.

The requirements of a specialist Breast Centre.

INTRODUCTION: In recognition of the advances and evidence based changes in clinical practice that have occurred in recent years and taking into account the knowledge and experience accumulated through the voluntary breast unit certification programme, Eusoma has produced this up-dated and revised guidelines on the requirements of a Specialist Breast Centre (BC). METHODS: The content of these guidelines is based on evidence from the recent relevant peer reviewed literature and the consensus of a multidisciplinary team of European experts. The guidelines define the requirements for each breast service and for the specialists who work in specialist Breast Centres. RESULTS: The guidelines identify the minimum requirements needed to set up a BC, these being an integrated Breast Centre, dealing with a sufficient number of cases to allow effective working and continuing expertise, dedicated specialists working with a multidisciplinary approach, providing all services throughout the patients pathway and data collection and audit. It is essential that the BC also guarantees the continuity of care for patients with advanced (metastatic) disease offering treatments according to multidisciplinary competencies and a high quality palliative care service. The BC must ensure that comprehensive support and expertise may be needed, not only through the core BC team, but also ensure that all other medical and paramedical expertise that may be necessary depending on the individual case are freely available, referring the patient to the specific care provider depending on the problem. CONCLUSIONS: Applying minimum requirements and quality indicators is essential to improve organisation, performance and outcome in breast care. Efficacy and compliance have to be constantly monitored to evaluate the quality of patient care and to allow appropriate corrective actions leading to improvements in patient care.

High Ki67 predicts unfavourable outcomes in early breast cancer patients with a clinically clear axilla who do not receive axillary dissection or axillary radiotherapy.

AIM: Axillary dissection is increasingly forgone in early breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axilla. The GRISO 053 randomised trial recruited 435 patients of age over 45 years, tumour ≤1.4 cm and clinically negative axilla, to assess the importance of axillary radiotherapy versus no axillary radiotherapy in patients not given axillary dissection. In the present study on a subgroup GRISO cases our aim was to assess the prognostic importance of tumour biological factors after more than 10 years of follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed biological factors in a subgroup of 285 GRISO cases (145 given axillary radiotherapy; 140 not given axillary radiotherapy) with complete biologic, therapeutic and follow-up information, using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modelling. RESULTS: Only 10-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was lower in the axillary radiotherapy (1%) than no axillary radiotherapy arm (7%) (p=0.037). Irrespective of study arm, hormone receptor positivity had significantly favourable effects on 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative subtypes were associated with lower 10-year DFS (60% and 76%, respectively) than luminal A (96%) and B (91%) (p=0.001). Ten-year DFS for high (≥14%) Ki67 cancers was lower than for low Ki67 cancers (p=0.027); however, this effect was mainly confined to the no axillary radiotherapy arm. CONCLUDING STATEMENT: For patients with clinically node-negative small breast cancer not given axillary dissection, 10-year DFS is worsened by HER2 positivity, triple-negative phenotype and high Ki67. Axillary radiotherapy counteracts the negative prognostic effect of high Ki67 in patients not receiving axillary dissection.

Treatment of invasive male breast cancer: a 40-year single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the management and outcome of invasive male breast cancer treated in a single-institution over a period of 40 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and pathological features of 60 male patients affected by breast carcinoma treated at our Radiotherapy Unit between 1971 and 2011. Tumours were classified according to histological type and the updated 2010 TNM classification of malignant tumours. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8.9 [range, 0.6-20; standard deviation (SD), 4.98] years, 32 patients (53.3%) were alive and 16 patients died (26.7%) due to disease progression and 12 (20%) due to other causes. At univariate analysis for overall survival, pathological tumour size (p=0.031), histological subtype (p=0.013) and nodal status (p=0.006) emerged as significant predictors of death. At multivariate analysis, independent death predictors were advanced pathological tumour size (p=0.016), positive nodal status (p=0.003) and invasive cribriform histological type (p=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: In consideration of the rarity of the disease, many issues are still being debated, and future collaborative studies are required. However, our experience confirms the prognostic role of greater pathological tumour size and positive nodal status as unfavourable features for survival in male breast cancer.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) and oral vinorelbine in first-line metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

Doxorubicin is highly effective and widely used in breast cancer; however, its use is limited by cardiotoxicity related to its cumulative dose. In previous studies, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has shown an acceptable toxicity profile with minimal cardiotoxicity. Between June 2006 and October 2009, 27 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with first-line PLD and vinorelbine at the University of Florence, Radiotherapy Unit. PLD (30 mg/m²) was administered on day 1, and oral vinorelbine (60 mg/m²) was administered on days 1 and 8 of a 4-week cycle. All patients were previously treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Median age was 52 years (range 38-69) and median time to metastasis was 78.5 months. There were no treatment interruptions or discontinuation for cardiac toxicity and no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3 hematological toxicity was observed in 18.6% of patients, and 3.7% had grade 3 non-hematological adverse events. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range 3-33), median response duration was 6.1 months, and median PFS was 5.3 months. The overall clinical benefit rate was 55.5%. Our experience adds to evidence supporting the activity and cardiac safety of PLD and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Use of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

We evaluated the feasibility and incidence of hematological toxicity in a series of 39 breast cancer patients treated at our institute with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by docetaxel, using prophylactic G-CSF (pegfilgrastim). We prescribed G-CSF as secondary prophylaxis during the AC regimen and as primary prophylaxis during treatment with docetaxel. For the AC treatment, we recorded 6 cases of grade III (15.3%) and one case of grade IV (2.5%) neutropenia; we found one case of Grade IV anemia. For the docetaxel regimen, we registered one case of Grade IV (2.5%) neutropenia and three cases of Grade III leukopoenia without neutropenia. No patients experienced cardiac symptoms or baseline LVEF rate decrease. All patients concluded the programmed chemotherapy. Our experience shows the safety of docetaxel in combination with anthracyclines and the efficacy of prophylaxis with G-CSF in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy.

Concomitant adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy with anthracycline-based regimens in breast cancer: a single centre experience.

PURPOSE: This study was done to evaluate the toxicity related to concurrent radiotherapy and anthracycline (AC)-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer and to investigate the impact of treatment interruptions and the feasibility of this uncommon therapeutic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to December 2007, 60 patients were treated at our Centre. The mean age at presentation was 48.5 (range 38-64) years. All patients underwent conservative surgery, and radiotherapy to the entire breast (mean dose 50 Gy; range 46-52 Gy). AC-based regimens consisted of four cycles of AC (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) or four cycles of epirubicin (EPI) followed by four courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). RESULTS: Concomitant treatment caused acute skin G3 toxicity in 8.9% of patients and one case of G4 toxicity (1.7%). Concerning cardiac assessment, six of the 56 evaluable patients (10.7%) developed an asymptomatic decline of left ventricular ejection fraction >10% and <20% of the baseline value. Radiotherapy was temporarily stopped in 21.3% and chemotherapy in 57.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, concomitant chemotherapy did not emerge as a significant factor in radiotherapy interruption. Moreover, no severe cardiac events were recorded.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer adjuvant treatment.

Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the management of locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Postmastectomy RT has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of loco-regional failure and to improve disease free survival in high-risk women with BC. Many trials have shown a significant benefit in local control, disease-free and overall survival with the addition of RT for patients with stage II and III breast cancer. New perspectives are evaluating multiple biological variables that nowadays should be considered in clinical oncology for the prescription of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Tailored randomized trials are now ongoing to clarify the "grey zone" represented by the intermediate-risk group of patients (1-3 lymph nodes involved). We reviewed the major studies offered by literature with emphasis on the principal debated issues.

The impact of young age on breast cancer outcome.

AIMS: We conducted a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the impact of age on women aged less than 35 years affected by breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1972 and December 2006, 346 patients aged less than 35 years underwent adjuvant treatment at Florence University. The mean age of the patient population was 32 years (range 22-35): 76 patients were under 30 years old, the remaining were above 30 years old. RESULTS: In our series, 215 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy to whole breast after conservative surgery, 131 patients underwent mastectomy without subsequent radiation therapy and 323 patients had lymphadenectomy; 191 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 73 with anthracycline-containing regimen. With a median time of 2.5 years (range 6 months to 27.6 years) local relapses were observed in 67 cases (19.4%). At the multivariate analysis of local disease-free survival, ductal and ductal plus lobular histotypes, having more than 3 positive nodes, and age emerged as independent significant relapse predictors (p=0.018, p=0.0005, p=0.003 and p=0.024, respectively). For the DSS analysis, the median follow-up was 6.8 years (range 0.6-36.7 years). At the multivariate analysis, age (p=0.0038), positive nodes (p=0.0035) and distant metastases (p<0.0001) resulted to be independent death predictors. Patients younger than 30 had a worse prognosis. At the univariate analysis also local relapse resulted to be statistically significant (p=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy seems to improve the outcome of these patients. However, there is an urgent need for tailored treatment investigations within the framework of randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Quality indicators in breast cancer care.

To define a set of quality indicators that should be routinely measured and evaluated to confirm that the clinical outcome reaches the requested standards, Eusoma has organised a workshop during which twenty four experts from different disciplines have reviewed the international literature and selected the main process and outcome indicators available for quality assurance of breast cancer care. A review of the literature for evidence-based recommendations have been performed by the steering committee. The experts have identified the quality indicators also taking into account the usability and feasibility. For each of them it has been reported: definition, minimum and target standard, motivation for selection and level of evidence (graded according to AHRO). In overall 17 main quality indicators have been identified, respectively, 7 on diagnosis, 4 on surgery and loco-regional treatment, 2 on systemic treatment and 4 on staging, counselling, follow-up and rehabilitation. Breast Units in Europe are invited to comply with these indicators and monitor them during their periodic audit meetings.

The impact of young age on breast cancer outcome.

AIMS: We conducted a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the impact of age on women aged less than 35 years affected by breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1972 and December 2006, 346 patients aged less than 35 years underwent adjuvant treatment at Florence University. The mean age of the patient population was 32 years (range 22-35): 76 patients were under 30 years old, the remaining were above 30 years old. RESULTS: In our series, 215 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy to whole breast after conservative surgery, 131 patients underwent mastectomy without subsequent radiation therapy and 323 patients had lymphadenectomy; 191 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 73 with anthracycline-containing regimen. With a median time of 2.5 years (range 6 months to 27.6 years) local relapses were observed in 67 cases (19.4%). At the multivariate analysis of local disease-free survival, ductal and ductal plus lobular histotypes, having more than 3 positive nodes, and age emerged as independent significant relapse predictors (p = 0.018, p = 0.0005, p = 0.003 and p = 0.024, respectively). For the DSS analysis, the median follow-up was 6.8 years (range 0.6-36.7 years). At the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.0038), positive nodes (p = 0.0035) and distant metastases (p < 0.0001) resulted to be independent death predictors. Patients younger than 30 had a worse prognosis. At the univariate analysis also local relapse resulted to be statistically significant (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy seems to improve the outcome of these patients. However, there is an urgent need for tailored treatment investigations within the framework of randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Dermo quiz: the illness and death of Anna Maria Lodovica de' Medici, Palatine Electress (1667-1743).

According to the unpublished documents, preserved in the Archives, the authors provide a possible explanation of the disease of the Anna Maria Lodovica de' Medici, the last descendent of the famous Florentine dynasty, suggesting that she could not have suffered from breast cancer, as it was claimed, but that she could have contracted syphilis. The opportunity to exhume her corpse in the frame of the Medici Project will supply evidence for this interpretation.

Adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer: experience from the University of Florence.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability profile of sequential trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer. We analyzed 94 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who underwent postoperative treatment between November 2003 and December 2008 at the University of florence. All patients received one year of sequential trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy. Cardiac monitoring in our study consisted of assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (lVef) by echocardiography at baseline, after the completion of chemotherapy, then every 3 months during trastuzumab treatment and every 6 months thereafter. 91.6% of patients were alive without evidence of distant or local relapse, while 8.4% developed disease recurrence. The cumulative incidence of cardiotoxicity was 14.5%. In our experience trastuzumab given postoperatively with adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and produced optimal clinical results in terms of disease-free survival.

ONCOPOOL - a European database for 16,944 cases of breast cancer.

ONCOPOOL is a retrospectively compiled database of primary operable invasive breast cancers treated in the 1990s in 10 European breast cancer Units. Sixteen thousand and nine hundred and forty four cases were entered, with tumours less than 5 cm diameter in women aged 70 or less (mean age 55). DATA: Data were date of birth, mode of diagnosis, pathology (size, lymph node status, grade, type, lympho-vascular invasion and hormone receptor) and therapies and outcome measures: first local, regional or distant recurrences, contralateral primary, date and cause of death. TUMOUR CHARACTERISTICS: Mean diameter 1.8 cm, 66% lymph node negative, 24% 1-3 lymph nodes involved and 10% had 4 or more involved. Grade 1, 29%; Grade 2, 41%; and Grade 3, 30%. Polynomial relationships were established between grade, stage and size. Seventy-five percent were oestrogen receptor (ER) positive. ER closely related to grade. OUTCOMES: Overall Survival was 89% at 5 years from diagnosis, 80% 10 years and 73% 15 years; Breast Cancer-Specific survivals were 91%, 84% and 79%. Survival strongly related to the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). Cases detected at screening had 84% 10-year survival, those presenting symptomatically 76%. ER positive cases treated with adjuvant hormone therapy had a reduction in risk of death of 13% over those not receiving adjuvant therapy (p=0.000). ER negative cases treated with chemotherapy showed a risk reduction of 23% over those not receiving chemotherapy (p=0.000).

Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

This study evaluated whether doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide are superior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Between July 1976 and December 2004, 1045 breast cancer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy at the Radiotherapy Unit of the University of florence. 927 were administered i.v. CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days for a total of six cycles) and 118 i.v. DC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) on day 1 repeated every 21 days for a total of four cycles). All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy as well. The survival analysis, stratified according to treatment, did not show any significant difference in metastasis occurrence between the two groups (log rank test p=0.42). According to multivariate analysis four parameters emerged as independent prognostic factors for distant metastases in patients treated with the Cmf regimen: pt (p=0.0005), number of positive axillary lymph nodes (p=<0.0001), tamoxifen use (p=0.0109) and local relapses (p=<0.0001). Only number of positive axillary lymph nodes and local relapses were significant predictors of metastases occurrence according to multivariate analysis in the DC group, 17 and p=0.028, respectively. No significant difference between the two regimens was observed with regards to number of involved nodes. DC and CMF produced similar outcome in breast cancer patients.

Breast reconstruction after nipple/areola-sparing mastectomy using cell-enhanced fat grafting.

BACKGROUND: The success of fat grafting in breast reconstruction depends on fat retention. The use of stem-cells-enriched fat graft is an alternative method for graft stability. CASE REPORT: A case of nipple-areola sparing mastectomy double stage reconstruction with the use of stem cells enhanced fat graft is reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting is growing as a new and promising tool in reconstruction following nipple and areola sparing mastectomies as a way to restore a sufficient and reliable subcutaneous space in the mastectomy flap. This combined with an anatomical gel implant offers an integrated system of achieving a natural shaped breast.

Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

The clinical use of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasing, especially for applications requiring paramagnetic contrast-agent injection. This document presents a synthetic list of acceptable indications with potential advantages for women according to evidence from the literature and the expert opinion of the panel that developed this statement. We generally recommend that breast MR imaging be performed in centres with experience in conventional breast imaging [mammography and ultrasonography (US)] and needle-biopsy procedures (under stereotactic or US guidance) as well as in breast MR imaging and second-look US for findings not revealed by conventional imaging performed before MR imaging. In our opinion, there is no evidence in favour of breast MR imaging as a diagnostic tool to characterise equivocal findings at conventional imaging when needle-biopsy procedures can be performed, nor for the study of asymptomatic, non-high-risk women with negative conventional imaging. After a description of technical and methodological requirements, we define the indications and limitations of breast MR imaging for surveillance of high-risk women, local staging before surgery, evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast previously treated for carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome, nipple discharge and breast implants.

Guidelines on the standards for the training of specialised health professionals dealing with breast cancer.

According to EUSOMA position paper 'The requirements of a specialist breast unit', each breast unit should have a core team made up of health professionals who have undergone specialist training in breast cancer. In this paper, on behalf of EUSOMA, authors have identified the standards of training in breast cancer, to harmonise and foster breast care training in Europe. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the increase in the level of care in a breast unit, as the input of qualified health professionals increases the quality of breast cancer patient care.

EUSOMA accreditation of breast units.

EUSOMA (European Society of Mastology) is the organisation representing Breast Cancer Specialists in all disciplines, covering all aspects of breast cancer from risk and prevention, through diagnosis and treatment of the primary tumour, follow-up, treatment of recurrent and advanced disease, pathology, reconstruction, psychology and audit. EUSOMA Guidelines have been published on several aspects of breast cancer and are on service provision as well as giving clinical guidance and providing the basis for audit.