Career aspirations among specialty residents in France: a cross-sectional gender-based comparison.

BACKGROUND: Most studies evaluating career aspirations among gender are performed in Anglo-Saxon countries. Two recent French studies looked at the career choice of residents in obstetrics & gynecology. It seemed useful to us to broaden this questioning to other specialties, by proposing a study to all residents in the same Faculty. The objective of our study was to describe residents' career aspirations and possible barriers according to gender. METHODS: Declarative cross-sectional survey, using questionnaires sent by email to the specialty residents of the Faculty of Medicine of Lille (France). An analysis by specialty group (i.e., medicine, surgery, obstetrics & gynecology, and anesthesia & resuscitation) and a comparison of the results according to gender were performed. RESULTS: Of the 1384 specialty residents currently in training, 462 answered the questionnaire (33.38%), among whom 289 women and 173 men (average age = 27.08 ± 0.091 years). Seventeen women (5.9%) were currently considering a university hospital career versus 37 men (21.4%) (p = 0.001). Gender analysis made it possible to identify obstacles to engaging in a university career: lacking a female model, more frequent doubting the ability to undertake this type of career among women (61.6%) than men (35.3%) (p < 0.001), and gender discrimination felt in the workplace for 51.6% of women (versus 7.5% of men, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed specificities related to each specialty. CONCLUSIONS: Few residents plan to embark upon a university hospital career, let alone female residents. There are considerations specific to each specialty and marked gender differences regarding career aspirations. Many features have been identified as obstacles to access to university hospital positions for women. It is important to develop strategies to remove these barriers and enable women to pursue such university careers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable (no intervention).

Symptom related to Essure® and evolution after removal: Outcomes of retrospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The number of requests for Essure removal has grown continually over recent years. The objective is to describe the symptoms reported after Essure sterilization, methods of removal and results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective and single-centre cohort (Regional university hospital of Lille, France) was conducted. All women, having consulted from December 2016 to February 2019 for symptoms related to Essure insertion, were included. All the symptoms were noted. A second group was created that included patients who underwent Essure removal to evaluate the benefits of surgery on these symptoms. RESULTS: The study included 98 patients. Most frequent symptoms were musculoskeletal pain (75 %), asthenia (63 %) and pelvic pain (55 %). Fifty-nine patients (60 %) underwent surgery. Surgery appeared beneficial with reduction of symptoms in 60 % of these patients, complete resolution in 33 % and no reduction of symptoms in 7%. Many symptoms were relieved by surgery with an overall decline of 96 % in menorrhagia, 94 % in metrorrhagia and 93 % in dyspareunia. However, other symptoms were not relieved by surgery like 100 % of sleep disorders, 70 % of abdominal pain cases and 57 % of memory impairment cases. CONCLUSION: Symptoms related to Essure insertion are numerous. Although surgery appears beneficial, some adverse effects remain. Therefore, a preoperative aetiologic assessment and information about risk of surgery failure are important.

[Impact of gender in academic career among obstetrics and gynecology's residents: A comparison between Lille and Paris]. / Impact du genre sur le choix de carrière parmi les internes de gynécologie-obstétrique : comparaison Lille/Paris.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the professional aspiration and obstacles in gynecology and obstetrics residents careers between Lille and Paris. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, using questionnaires sent by e-mail to residents in obstetrics and gynecology in Lille. An analysis by genre was made, and those results were compared to results obtained in a same study with Parisian residents. RESULTS: Among the 73 residents in training in Lille, 63 responded (86.3%), of them 53 those were women and 10 were men. No woman answered wanting to start an academic career, however 50% of men did (P=0.001). The global analysis found obstacles to an academic career in defined areas such as: lack of mentors, lack of identification in a same sex role model or women doubting more than men in their abilities to achieve this career. The comparison between the two cities shown a greater gap between women and men in Lille: women in Lille were most reluctant to engage in academic careers and have not the prerequisites (diplomas, mobility or publications) that seem necessary for this type of career. CONCLUSIONS: Women were less expecting to have academic careers in Lille than in Paris. Many barriers have been identified as difficulties for them to follow this career path. It is important to develop strategies to encourage women in gynecology and obstetrics to find their place in research and teaching, since they are most present in this specialty.