Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 13: 32, 2013 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23927387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies are the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial ablation. The LNG-IUS can be applied easily by the general practitioner, which saves costs, but has considerable failure rates. As an alternative, endometrial ablation is also very effective, but this treatment has to be performed by a gynaecologist. Due to lack of direct comparison of LNG-IUS with endometrial ablation, there is no evidence based preferred advice for the use of one of these treatment possibilities. METHOD/DESIGN: A multicenter randomised controlled trial, organised in a network infrastructure in the Netherlands in which general practitioners and gynaecologists collaborate. DISCUSSON: This study, considering both effectiveness and cost effectiveness of LNG-IUS versus endometrial ablation may well improve care for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR2984.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Técnicas de Ablação Endometrial/métodos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/estatística & dados numéricos , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos , Resultado do Tratamento , Saúde da Mulher , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 13: 102, 2013 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23638956

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment with misoprostol is a non-invasive and inexpensive treatment option in first trimester miscarriage. However, about 30% of women treated with misoprostol have incomplete evacuation of the uterus. Despite being relatively asymptomatic in most cases, this finding often leads to additional surgical treatment (curettage). A comparison of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical management versus expectant management is lacking in women with incomplete miscarriage after misoprostol. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre randomized controlled trial that assesses the costs and effects of curettage versus expectant management in women with incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for first trimester miscarriage.Eligible women will be randomized, after informed consent, within 24 hours after identification of incomplete evacuation of the uterus by ultrasound scanning. Women are randomly allocated to surgical or expectant management. Curettage is performed within three days after randomization.Primary outcome is the sonographic finding of an empty uterus (maximal diameter of any contents of the uterine cavity < 10 millimeters) six weeks after study entry. Secondary outcomes are patients' quality of life, surgical outcome parameters, the type and number of re-interventions during the first three months and pregnancy rates and outcome 12 months after study entry. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence for the (cost) effectiveness of surgical versus expectant management in women with incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for first trimester miscarriage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register: NTR3110.


Assuntos
Aborto Incompleto/terapia , Dilatação e Curetagem/economia , Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Conduta Expectante/economia , Abortivos não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aborto Incompleto/diagnóstico por imagem , Aborto Incompleto/cirurgia , Aborto Espontâneo/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Misoprostol/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Qualidade de Vida , Reoperação , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ultrassonografia , Útero/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...