Interventional Versus Conservative Strategy in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissections: Insights From DISCO Registry.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection remains debated. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the DISCO (Dissezioni Spontanee Coronariche) Registry up to December 2020 were included. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Independent predictors of PCI and medical management were investigated. RESULTS: Among 369 patients, 129 (35%) underwent PCI, whereas 240 (65%) were medically managed. ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (68% versus 35%, P<0.001), resuscitated cardiac arrest (9% versus 3%, P<0.001), proximal coronary segment involvement (32% versus 7%, P<0.001), and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1 (54% versus 20%, P<0.001) were more frequent in the PCI arm. In-hospital event rates were similar. Between patients treated with PCI and medical therapy, there were no differences in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years (13.9% versus 11.7%, P=0.467), all-cause death (0.7% versus 0.4%, P=0.652), myocardial infarction (9.3% versus 8.3%, P=0.921) and repeat PCI (12.4% versus 8.7%, P=0.229). ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction at presentation (odds ratio [OR], 3.30 [95% CI, 1.56-7.12]; P=0.002), proximal coronary segment involvement (OR, 5.43 [95% CI, 1.98-16.45]; P=0.002), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 to 1 and 2 (respectively, OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.08-9.96]; P=0.038; and OR, 3.98 [95% CI, 1.38-11.80]; P=0.009) and luminal narrowing (OR per 5% increase, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.28]; P=0.037) were predictors of PCI, whereas the 2B-angiographic subtype predicted medical management (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07-0.83]; P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentation and procedural variables drive the choice of the initial therapeutic approach in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. If PCI is needed, it seems to be associated with a similar risk of short-to-mid-term adverse events compared to medical treatment. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04415762.

Association between hormone therapy and short-term cardiovascular events in women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Changes in sex hormone levels are a known triggering factor for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) in women. However, it is unknown whether exposure to exogenous hormone therapy (HT) at the time of SCAD presentation modifies the clinical course of this condition. We investigated the association between HT in female patients presenting with SCAD and short-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients presenting with SCAD from the DISCO-IT/SPA (dissezioni spontanee coronariche Italian-Spanish) registry. Women on HT (estrogens, progestagens, or gonadotropins) at the time of presentation were identified, and their clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared with those not receiving active HT. The outcome measure was nonfatal myocardial infarction and/or unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention during the first 28 days after the index catheterization. RESULTS: Of 224 women presenting with SCAD (mean age 52.0±10.0 years), 39 (17.4%) were currently using HT while 185 (82.6%) were not. No significant differences were noted in the baseline demographics, clinical presentation, angiographic features, or initial treatment received between the 2 groups. All patients on systemic HT (n=36, 92%) discontinued it at the time of diagnosis. The composite outcome occurred in 7 (17.9%) patients with prior HT compared with 14 (7.6%) without (P=.039). After multivariable adjustment, HT remained associated with the composite outcome recorded in the first 28 days of follow-up (HR, 3.53; 95%CI, 1.30-9.61; P=.013). CONCLUSIONS: In women with SCAD, exposure to HT at the time of clinical presentation was associated with short-term recurrent cardiovascular events such as nonfatal myocardial infarction and/or unplanned percutaneous revascularization.

Chronic Oral Anticoagulation Therapy and Prognosis of Patients Admitted to Hospital for COVID-19: Insights from the HOPE COVID-19 Registry.

Background: Most evidence regarding anticoagulation and COVID-19 refers to the hospitalization setting, but the role of oral anticoagulation (OAC) before hospital admission has not been well explored. We compared clinical outcomes and short-term prognosis between patients with and without prior OAC therapy who were hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: Analysis of the whole cohort of the HOPE COVID-19 Registry which included patients discharged (deceased or alive) after hospital admission for COVID-19 in 9 countries. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Study outcomes were compared after adjusting variables using propensity score matching (PSM) analyses. Results: 7698 patients were suitable for the present analysis (675 (8.8%) on OAC at admission: 427 (5.6%) on VKAs and 248 (3.2%) on DOACs). After PSM, 1276 patients were analyzed (638 with OAC; 638 without OAC), without significant differences regarding the risk of thromboembolic events (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.59-2.08). The risk of clinically relevant bleeding (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.92-4.83), as well as the risk of mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.47; log-rank p value = 0.041), was significantly increased in previous OAC users. Amongst patients on prior OAC only, there were no differences in the risk of clinically relevant bleeding, thromboembolic events, or mortality when comparing previous VKA or DOAC users, after PSM. Conclusion: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients on prior OAC therapy had a higher risk of mortality and worse clinical outcomes compared to patients without prior OAC therapy, even after adjusting for comorbidities using a PSM. There were no differences in clinical outcomes in patients previously taking VKAs or DOACs. This trial is registered with NCT04334291/EUPAS34399.

Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international & multicentre CRUNCH registry.

BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion increases the risk of cardiac adverse events. At present, there are limited options to treat refractory stent underexpansion. In this context, the intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) system might be a safe and effective strategy. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVL in addressing resistant stent underexpansion due to heavy underlying calcification. METHODS: This was an international multicentre registry including patients receiving IVL therapy to treat stent underexpansion from December 2017 to August 2020. Angiographic and intracoronary imaging data were collected. The efficacy endpoint was device success (technical success with a final percentage diameter stenosis <50%). The safety endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, the mean age was 73±9.2 years and 76% were male. The median time from stent implantation to IVL therapy was 49 days (0-2,537). Adjuvant treatment with non-compliant balloon dilatations pre- and post-IVL was performed in 72.3% and 76.8% of patients, respectively, and additional stenting was performed in 22.4%. Device success was 92.3%. Minimum lumen diameter increased from 1.49±0.73 mm to 2.41±0.67 mm (p<0.001) and stent expansion increased by 124.93±138.19% (p=0.016). No IVL-related procedural complications or MACE were observed. The use of bailout IVL therapy directly after stenting and the presence of ostial underexpanded lesions negatively predicted lumen diameter gain. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary lithotripsy is safe and effective in increasing lumen and stent dimensions in underexpanded stents secondary to heavily calcified lesions.

Antiplatelet therapy in patients with conservatively managed spontaneous coronary artery dissection from the multicentre DISCO registry.

AIMS: The role of antiplatelet therapy in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) undergoing initial conservative management is still a matter of debate, with theoretical arguments in favour and against its use. The aims of this article are to assess the use of antiplatelet drugs in medically treated SCAD patients and to investigate the relationship between single (SAPT) and dual (DAPT) antiplatelet regimens and 1-year patient outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the 1-year outcome of patients with SCAD managed with initial conservative treatment included in the DIssezioni Spontanee COronariche (DISCO) multicentre international registry. Patients were divided into two groups according to SAPT or DAPT prescription. Primary endpoint was 12-month incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and any unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Out of 314 patients included in the DISCO registry, we investigated 199 patients in whom SCAD was managed conservatively. Most patients were female (89%), presented with acute coronary syndrome (92%) and mean age was 52.3 ± 9.3 years. Sixty-seven (33.7%) were given SAPT whereas 132 (66.3%) with DAPT. Aspirin plus either clopidogrel or ticagrelor were prescribed in 62.9% and 36.4% of DAPT patients, respectively. Overall, a 14.6% MACE rate was observed at 12 months of follow-up. Patients treated with DAPT had a significantly higher MACE rate than those with SAPT [18.9% vs. 6.0% hazard ratios (HR) 2.62; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.22-5.61; P = 0.013], driven by an early excess of non-fatal MI or unplanned PCI. At multiple regression analysis, type 2a SCAD (OR: 3.69; 95% CI 1.41-9.61; P = 0.007) and DAPT regimen (OR: 4.54; 95% CI 1.31-14.28; P = 0.016) resulted independently associated with a higher risk of 12-month MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In this European registry, most patients with SCAD undergoing initial conservative management received DAPT. Yet, at 1-year follow-up, DAPT, as compared with SAPT, was independently associated with a higher rate of adverse cardiovascular events (ClinicalTrial.gov id: NCT04415762).

Return towards normality in admissions for myocardial infarction after the lockdown removal for COVID-19 outbreak in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Investigations demonstrated a decrease of admissions for myocardial infarction (MI) during the CoronaVirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) outbreak. No study has evaluated the time required to reverse this downward curve of MI admissions. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis on patients (N = 2415) admitted to the Emergency Departments for acute MI in nine Italian centers. Primary endpoint was the incidence rates (IRs) of MI admissions in the post-lockdown COVID-19 period (case-period: from May 4 to July 12, 2020) vs. the following control periods: January 1-February 19, 2020 (pre-lockdown period); February 20-May 3, 2020 (intra-lockdown period); May 4-July 12, 2019 (inter-year non-COVID-19 period). RESULTS: IR of admissions for MI in the post-lockdown period was higher than the intra-lockdown period (IR ratio, IRR: 1.60, 95% CI 1.42-1.81; p = 0.0001), was lower than the pre-lockdown period (IRR: 0.86, 0.77-0.96; p = 0.009) and similar to the inter-year non-COVID-19 period (IRR: 0.96, 0.87-1.07; p = 0.47). Within the case period, the increase in MI admissions was more pronounced in earlier vs later weeks (IRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.38, p = 0.024) and, compared to the inter-year control period, was significant for non ST-segment elevation MI (IRR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.46, p = 0.004), but was not observed for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), where hospitalizations were reduced (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study first indicates an increase in the number of admissions for MI after the removal of the national lockdown for COVID-19 in Italy. This increase was prevalent in the first weeks following the lockdown removal, but was under-represented in STEMI patients.

Very late stent expansion with intracoronary lithotripsy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Underexpanded stent in heavily calcified coronary lesion is common and persists over years. It is related to long-term failure and negative outcomes. Treatment of this situation after many years with intracoronary lithotripsy (ICL-Shockwave®) could be an option. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of a man with underexpanded coronary stent implanted 11 years earlier. Optical coherence tomography highlighted the mechanism of stent underexpansion showing the presence of calcium stones under the old struts. Intracoronary lithotripsy crushed calcium under the stent struts causing its geometric change (from elliptical to round shape) and a consequent better transmission of the true radial force of the old stent. DISCUSSION: Heavily calcified coronary lesions lead to stent underexpansion which persists over years. Intracoronary lithotripsy could be a very late option to manage this unfavourable common result.

Bail-out unexpanded stent implantation in acute left main dissection treated with intra coronary lithotripsy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The percutaneous treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions is challenging and presents high rate of complications. Unexpandable stent is one of the most serious complication. Both of these conditions may benefit from the intracoronary lithotripsy (ICL-Shockwave®), a new coronary percutaneous technique. CASE SUMMARY: This case report describes a man treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a left main (LM) severe calcified lesion. The PCI was complicated by a huge dissection of LM in a not completely expandable lesion. A bail-out stent implantation was performed with residual unexpansion. The ICL permitted to expand acutely the stent and obtain an optimal final result. DISCUSSION: Familiarity with dedicated techniques and devices to treat calcified coronary lesions is fundamental to perform high-risk complex PCI. This case emphasizes the potential usefulness of the new ICL technique to treat calcified lesions or related complications like unexpandable stent.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: always coronary angiography?

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains one of the principle challenges in the setting of critical care medicine and emergency cardiology. Areas covered: Long-term survival rates even after successful resuscitation are variable but increasing in the recent years; due to the improvement of base and advanced cardiac life support techniques an increasing number of resuscitated patients are admitted to the hospital. Recent data suggested that patients surviving to hospital discharge after OHCA presented long-term outcome similar to patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, limited and incompletely clear data are available in the literature about the selection and risk stratification of patients to be subjected to coronary angiography, particularly in patients who have unfavorable clinical features in whom procedures may be futile and may affect public reporting of morality. Recently the ESC and AHA addressed appropriate treatments for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Expert commentary: Immediate coronary intervention in the setting of OHCA appears to be associated with better survival to discharge; the documentation of an occluded coronary artery in medium 25% of patients without signs of STEMI at ECG helps to explain why early angiography can improve outcomes. In the treatment of OHCA we can find some ethical issues; for example a combination of comorbidities with advanced age and prolonged ischemia indicated by severe lactic acidosis may signify a high enough chance of multiorgan failure or anoxic brain injury and where the benefit of coronary reperfusion therapy appears minimal.

Intracoronary Bivalirudin Bolus in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated with Primary Angioplasty: Theoretical Bases, Clinical Experience, and Future Applications.

Intracoronary thrombus is a common finding in acute coronary syndromes and often correlates with adverse prognosis and complications during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is one of the recommended antithrombotic treatments for PCI in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The intracoronary administration of a bivalirudin loading dose, even if off-label, offers theoretical advantages over the standard intravenous route, providing a very high drug concentration in the infarct-related artery without increasing the total dose of the drug administered. After the description in case reports of such an approach, a larger scale experience was recently reported in a large cohort of patients with STEMI treated during primary PCI with a bivalirudin intracoronary loading dose followed by the standard intravenous maintenance infusion. As a control group, a propensity score-matched cohort of patients undergoing primary PCI treated with intravenous bivalirudin in the same institution was selected. Compared with the intravenous bolus, the intracoronary administration of bivalirudin was associated with improved ST-segment resolution, lower post-procedural peak CK-MB levels, and better Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count values, without difference in bleeding rates. Thus, this new promising antithrombotic strategy, based on the intracoronary administration of a bivalirudin loading dose during primary PCI, appeared safe, improved myocardial reperfusion, and mitigated enzymatic myocardial infarct size compared with the standard intravenous protocol. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm these results and evaluate the possible long-term clinical benefits.

Ticagrelor: Long-Term Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Atherothrombosis and coronary artery disease affect more than 13 million individuals only in the United States, about 8 millions in Europe and are the major causes of death worldwide. In particular chronic stable angina impairs patient quality of life, is associated with an important health spending and increased patient mortality; it is a prominent symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD), the latter being prevalent worldwide in patients. A key role in pathophysiology of cardiovascular acute events is played by activated platelets. Aspirin and adenosine diphosphate antagonist in addition to it is recommended for 1 year for reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction with a weak recommendation to continue thereafter. P2Y12 receptor antagonists, in addition to aspirin, have been shown in the last years, to reduce ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome but their role in secondary prevention is still new and unclear. The aim of our paper is to review the long-term effect of therapy with ticagrelor on the basis of recent evidence based data. METHODS: We performed an online search on the major search engines. All the randomized controlled trials were summarized in the table. RESULTS: We included in our paper six randomized controlled trials and we mentioned about ten post - hoc analysis, sub studies and registries. All studies included the type the therapy and a mid or long term clinical follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The studies reported in our paper and in particular PEGASUS - TIMI 54 study showed the merit to placing attention of prevention secondary ischemic events after acute coronary syndrome in the context of treatment with dual anti - platelet therapy; it proved a clinical benefit in patients treated with ticagrelor (60 mg x 2) for 3 years. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of these results cannot be generalized to patients with higher bleeding risk or low ischemic risk. In fact prolonged therapy with ticagrelor 60 mg in combination with aspirin could be considered valuable in patients with repeated acute ischemic events or with several coronary revascularizations over time (especially in patients with lower bleeding risk).

Acute contractile recovery extent during biventricular pacing is not associated with follow-up in patients undergoing resynchronization.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that contractility, as assessed using dobutamine infusion, is independently associated with reverse remodeling after CRT. Controversy, however, exists about the capacity of this approach to predict a long-term clinical response. This study's purpose was to assess whether long-term CRT clinical effects can be predicted according to acute inotropic response induced by biventricular stimulation (CRT on), as compared with AAI-VVI right stimulation pacing mode (CRT off), quantified at the time of implantation. METHODS: In 98 patients (ejection fraction 29 ± 10%), acute changes in left ventricular (LV) elastance (Ees), arterial elastance (Ea), and Ees/Ea, as assessed from slope changes of the force-frequency relation obtained when the heart rate increased, and also assessed while measuring triplane LV volumes and continuous noninvasive blood pressure, were related to death or rehospitalization during a 3-year follow-up. Other covariances tested were age, gender, disease etiology, QRS duration, amount of mitral regurgitation, LV diastolic volume, ejection fraction, and the degree of asynchrony and longitudinal strain at baseline. RESULTS: There was a marked increment in the Ees slope with CRT (interaction P = 0.004), no Ea change, and modest Ees/Ea increase (interaction P < 0.05). In Cox analysis, however, neither slope changes nor baseline values of Ees, Ea, and Ees/Ea were associated with long-term follow-up. Only ventricular diastolic volume (direct relation P = 0.002) and QRS duration (inverse relation P = 0.009) predicted death/rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Acute contractile recovery in CRT patients is not associated with 3 years prognosis. Instead, death or rehospitalization can be predicted from QRS duration and LV diastolic volume at baseline.

Intracoronary vs intravenous bivalirudin bolus in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary bolus administration may provide high local bivalirudin concentration without changing the global dose, potentially offering a more favorable antithrombotic effect in the infarct related artery (IRA). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of intracoronary bolus administration of bivalirudin followed by the standard intravenous infusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In 245 consecutive patients treated with primary PCI, bivalirudin bolus was given directly in the IRA, followed by a standard intravenous infusion. Clinical reperfusion markers, postprocedural coronary flow indexes, and bleeding events of the intracoronary group were compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of primary PCI patients (n=245) treated with the standard bivalirudin protocol of intravenous bolus and infusion. RESULTS: Higher rates of ⩾70% ST-segment resolution (72.7% vs 60.0%, p=0.004), lower postprocedural peak CK-MB levels (188.3±148.7 vs 242.1±208.1 IU/dl, p=0.025) and better Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count values (14.7 vs 17.9, p=0.001) were observed in the IC bolus group compared with the standard intravenous bolus group. Rates of bleeding were similar between groups. Only three cases of acute stent thrombosis were observed, all in the intravenous bolus group (p=0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary bivalirudin bolus administration during primary PCI is safe and improves ST-segment resolution, postprocedural coronary flow and enzymatic infarct size compared with the standard intravenous route.

Right ventricular septal pacing: Safety and efficacy in a long term follow up.

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the permanent high interventricular septal pacing in a long term follow up, as alternative to right ventricular apical pacing. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated: (1) 244 patients (74 ± 8 years; 169 men, 75 women) implanted with a single (132 pts) or dual chamber (112 pts) pacemaker (PM) with ventricular screw-in lead placed at the right ventricular high septal parahisian site (SEPTAL pacing); (2) 22 patients with permanent pacemaker and low percentage of pacing (< 20%) (NO pacing); (3) 33 patients with high percentage (> 80%) right ventricular apical pacing (RVA). All patients had a narrow spontaneous QRS (101 ± 14 ms). We evaluated New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life (QoL), 6 min walking test (6MWT) and left ventricular function (end-diastolic volume, LV-EDV; end-systolic volume, LV-ESV; ejection fraction, LV-EF) with 2D-echocardiography. RESULTS: Pacing parameters were stable during follow up (21 mo/patient). In SEPTAL pacing group we observed an improvement in NYHA class, QoL score and 6MWT. While LV-EDV didn't significantly increase (104 ± 40 mL vs 100 ± 37 mL; P = 0.35), LV-ESV slightly increased (55 ± 31 mL vs 49 ± 27 mL; P = 0.05) and LV-EF slightly decreased (49% ± 11% vs 53% ± 11%; P = 0.001) but never falling < 45%. In the RVA pacing control group we observed a worsening of NYHA class and an important reduction of LV-EF (from 56% ± 6% to 43% ± 9%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Right ventricular permanent high septal pacing is safe and effective in a long term follow up evaluation; it could be a good alternative to the conventional RVA pacing in order to avoid its deleterious effects.

[Giant aneurysm of the right coronary artery: an unusual treatment]. / Aneurisma gigante della coronaria destra: un trattamento inusuale.

Coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is an uncommon disease observed in only 0.15-4.9% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. CAA are defined as dilated coronary artery sections exceeding by 1.5 times the diameter of normal adjacent segments or of the patient's largest coronary vessel. Occasionally, CAA enlarge enough to be called giant CAA. We report the case of a 78-year-old man, with known chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy and a history of prior coronary artery bypass surgery (with a left internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery and saphenous venous graft to the obtuse marginal branch), who was referred to our cardiology department for progressive dyspnea. Echocardiography showed severe mitral regurgitation suggesting replacement; coronary angiography revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease, left internal mammary artery patency, saphenous vein graft occlusion and an aneurysm of the mid right coronary artery. Cardiac magnetic resonance confirmed this finding, showing a giant CAA (65 x 75 mm) with a large endoluminal thrombus. Treatment is not standardized and may include medical therapy, percutaneous treatment and surgical intervention; our patient underwent percutaneous coil embolization. One-month angiographic follow-up showed successful obliteration. The patient underwent surgical mitral valve replacement without any complications. At 9-month clinical follow-up, he was asymptomatic; transthoracic echocardiography showed an ejection fraction of 44% without prosthetic mitral regurgitation.

Beta-Blockers and Nitrates: Pharmacotherapy and Indications.

Many clinically important differences exist between beta blockers. B1-selectivity is of clinical interest because at clinically used doses, b1- selective agents block cardiac b-receptors while having minor effects on bronchial and vascular b-receptors. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents significantly decrease the frequency and duration of angina pectoris, instead the prognostic benefit of beta-blockers in stable angina has been extrapolated from studies of post myocardial infarction but has not yet been documented without left ventricular disfunction or previous myocardial infarction. Organic nitrates are among the oldest drugs, but they still remain a widely used adjuvant in the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. While their efficacy in relieving angina pectoris symptoms in acute settings and in preventing angina before physical or emotional stress is undisputed, the chronic use of nitrates has been associated with potentially important side effects such as tolerance and endothelial dysfunction. B-blockers are the firstline anti-anginal therapy in stable stable angina patients without contraindications, while nitrates are the secondline anti-anginal therapy. Despite 150 years of clinical practice, they remain fascinating drugs, which in a chronic setting still deserve investigation. This review evaluated pharmacotherapy and indications of Beta-blockers and nitrates in stable angina.

New Anti-Anginal Drugs: Ranolazine.

Chronic angina represents a condition that impairs quality of life and is associated with decreased life expectancy in the industrialized countries. Current therapies that reduce angina frequency include old drugs such as nitrates, ß -blockers and calcium antagonists. Several new investigational drugs are being tested for the treatment of chronic angina. This review will focus on ranolazine, a drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006 for patients with chronic angina who continue to be symptomatic despite optimized therapies. The main molecular mechanism underlying ranolazine-mediated beneficial effects has been identified as inhibition of the late Na+ current during the action potential, which potentially improves oxygen consumption, diastolic dysfunction and coronary blood flow. The aim of this review is to update the evidence for ranolazine treatment in chronic angina and discuss its therapeutic perspectives based on the most recent clinical and experimental studies.

Pathophysiology of Atherosclerotic Plaque Development.

Cardiovascular diseases and in particular coronary atherosclerotic disease are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the industrialized countries. Coronary atherosclerosis has been recognized for over a century and it was the subject of various studies. Pathophysiological studies have unravelled the interactions of molecular and cellular elements involved in atherogenesis; during the last decades the basic research has focused on the study of the instability of atherosclerotic plaque. Plaque rupture and resulting intracoronary thrombosis are thought to account for most acute coronary syndromes including ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction and non ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction. This is a brief review of the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic plaque development.