Novel Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Report of Initial Results.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy using the Aspire mechanical thrombectomy device (Control Medical) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as measured by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow post procedure compared with baseline. METHODS: This is a retrospective study for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. The study was approved by an independent ethical review board. Data were collected retrospectively from 48 subjects at three study sites. The primary endpoint was TIMI flow post thrombectomy compared with baseline. The safety endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiac event, defined as death, MI, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Eligibility criteria included AMI patients ages 18-90 years who had previous treatment with the Aspire mechanical thrombectomy device, preprocedure TIMI flow 0 to 2, and ability to tolerate antiplatelet therapy. RESULTS: Of the 48 subjects, 81.2% were male, 33.3% were diabetics, 64.6% were hypertensive, 52.1% had hyperlipidemia, and 85.4% had STEMI, with 38.0% anterior and 56.0% inferior AMI. Baseline TIMI flow was 0-1 in 89.6% of subjects. Post-thrombectomy TIMI flow 2-3 was achieved in 85.4% and all subjects had TIMI flow 3 at the end of the intervention. The device did not track in 1 patient and was not used. There were 5 deaths (10.4%), all unrelated to the aspiration thrombectomy procedure, and 0% experienced a stroke. CONCLUSION: The Aspire mechanical thrombectomy device demonstrated initial effectiveness and safety. Further prospective studies using objective performance criteria to demonstrate effectiveness and safety using the Aspire mechanical thrombectomy device are necessary to determine whether short-term and long-term outcomes improve over previously published clinical trials.

The CLOSER trial: a multi-center study on the clinical safety and effectiveness of CloserTM VSS, a novel resorbable transfemoral vascular access sealing system.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Closer Vascular Sealing System (VSS) against prespecified performance goals (PGs) in sealing femoral arterial access following 5-7 Fr procedures. BACKGROUND: Inconsistent safety profiles, costs and learning curves of earlier generation vascular closure devices have limited their widespread use following transfemoral procedures. METHODS: In this prospective single-arm, multi-center trial, we compared the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing 5-7 Fr transfemoral diagnostic or interventional procedures and access sites managed with Closer VSS against pre-specified PGs. The primary endpoints were time to hemostasis (TTH) and 30-day access site closure-related major complications; secondary endpoints included time to ambulation (TTA), time to discharge eligibility (TTDE), time to discharge (TTD), 30-day access site minor complications, procedure and device success. RESULTS: A total of 220 subjects (49.5% interventional) were enrolled. The mean TTH was 1.78 ± 7.81 min in the intention to treat and 0.98 ± 3.71 min in the per protocol cohort. Median TTH was 0 min with immediate hemostasis achieved in 80.5% of subjects, mean TTA was 2.50 ± 1.05 hr, and mean TTDE was 2.83 ± 1.54 hr. Thirty-day follow-up was completed on 219 subjects. There were no access site closure-related major complications, minor complication rate was 0.0% for diagnostic and 2.75% for interventional procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing 5-7 Fr transfemoral diagnostic and interventional procedures, the CLOSER Trial met both its primary effectiveness and safety PGs. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in the majority of patients without major complication.

Multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is frequently diagnosed after permanent damage has occurred, resulting in a high rate of morbidity, amputation, and loss of life. Early and ongoing diagnosis and treatment is required for this progressive disease. Lifestyle modifications can prevent or delay disease progression and improve symptoms. Limb-sparing endovascular interventions can restore circulation based on appropriate diagnostic testing to pinpoint vascular targets, and intervention must occur as early as possible to ensure optimal clinical outcomes. An algorithm for the diagnosis and management of PAD was developed to enable a collaborative approach between the family practice and primary care physician or internist and various specialists that may include a diabetologist, endocrinologist, smoking cessation expert, hypertension and lipid specialist, endovascular interventionalist, vascular surgeon, orthopedist, neurologist, nurse practitioner, podiatrist, wound healing expert, and/or others. A multidisciplinary team working together has the greatest chance of providing optimal care for the patient with PAD and ensuring ongoing surveillance of the patient's overall health, ultimately resulting in better quality of life and increased longevity for patients with PAD.

A prospective, randomized, pivotal trial of a novel extravascular collagen-based closure device compared to manual compression in diagnostic and interventional patients.

OBJECTIVES: The RESPECT trial was aimed at evaluating safety/efficacy of a new extravascular closure system in diagnostic (Dx) and interventional (Ix) procedures performed through 6 or 7 Fr introducer sheaths. BACKGROUND: Although vascular closure devices (VCDs) have been available for two decades, manual compression (MC) remains the standard of care in many institutions. VCDs have not been shown to have greater safety than MC. METHODS: The RESPECT trial was a multicenter, randomized comparison of the Vascade VCD (Cardiva Medical, Inc) versus MC in Dx and Ix patients undergoing femoral access. Endpoints included time to hemostasis (TTH), time to ambulation (TTA), time to discharge eligibility (TTDe), device and procedure success, major and minor complications. Subjects were randomized 2:1 (Vascade vs MC). RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were enrolled (211 Dx, 209 Ix). Mean age was 62 ± 11 years and 29% were female. For Ix Vascade/MC patients, 77%/69% received bivalirudin, 27%/26% received heparin, and 8%/3% received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, respectively. Patients were followed for 30 ± 7 days. A total of 415 subjects (98.8%) completed follow-up. TTH was 3.0 minutes (range, 0.6-31.6 minutes) for Vascade vs 20.0 minutes (range, 0.0-97.0 minutes) for MC; TTA was 3.2 hours (range, 1.0-78.0 hours) for Vascade vs. 5.2 hours (range, 1.7-22.8 hours) for MC; and TTDe was 3.6 hours (range, 1.4-78.4 hours) for Vascade vs. 5.7 hours (range, 2.2-23.2 hours) for MC. Device and procedure success rates were 98% for Vascade and 100% for MC. Minor events were 1.1% for Vascade and 7% for MC. No major access-site related complications were reported in either arm. CONCLUSION: Despite high percentage of bivalirudin use, there were no major access-site related complications in either arm. Vascade use reduced rates of minor access-site related complications, and significantly shortened TTH, TTA, and TTDe compared to MC.

Intracoronary glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor infusion via a perfusion coronary catheter to decrease thrombus burden: results from the ClearWay™ Multicenter Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter registry aimed to assess the ClearWay™ (CW) perfusion catheter in reduction of thrombus burden and improvement of the coronary flow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The presence or development of thrombus during PCI is associated with poor prognosis. METHODS: The utility of the CW perfusion catheter was assessed in patients who presented with intracoronary thrombus and were subjected to PCI. Data were collected by online survey from 15 US sites. Angiographic assessment of the coronary thrombus burden and the coronary flow after intracoronary infusion of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors via the CW catheter was evaluated at baseline, immediately after infusion, and at the end of the procedure. The cohort included 102 patients; 71.6% presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), 21.6% with non-ST-elevation MI, 5.9% with stable angina pectoris, and 2.9% with silent ischemia. The mean cohort age was 59.9±14.5years and comprised mostly of men (72.5%). RESULTS: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were infused via the CW catheter on average 1.1±0.3 times, with a mean pressure of 4.2±2.7atm and a mean infusion time of 55±55s. Following the infusion, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow improved by 1° in 71 patients (69.6%) and by 2° in 51 patients (50%), while visible thrombus was reduced by 52% (p<0.001). In the final angiogram, TIMI flow was restored in 90.2% and clearance of a visible thrombus was obtained in 91.8% of the lesions. CONCLUSION: Intracoronary infusion of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors via the perfusion CW catheter is associated with significant reduction in thrombus burden and with improvement of the coronary flow in patients presenting or developing thrombus burden during PCI.